Re: [Perfparse-users] Trouble patching check_nt to get perf data

[Clif J. S. <per...@cj...>]

I'm a complete moron - I just noticed the 1_3_0...  Thanks!

cjs


Cook, Garry wrote:

>That's the correct page. Just make sure you grab the 'HEAD' version,
>which should be the absolute latest version, although not necessarily
>stable. I believe that the version you grabbed was CVS of the old
>plugins (v 1.3.0). I made this assumption based on the name of the
>directory that you were working in,
>nagios-plugins-r1_3_0-200410041647]#.
>
>-g
>
>Clif J. Smith wrote:
>  
>
>>Did I grab the "latest CVS version of the 1.4.0-alpha plugins" by
>>grabbing those listed here:
>>http://nagiosplug.sourceforge.net/snapshot/ 
>>
>>Is there somewhere else they'd be located?  I found that location off
>>of the nagiosplugs web page saying it was the daily snapshot of
>>what's in CVS.
>>
>>cjs
>>
>>
>>
>>Cook, Garry wrote:
>>
>>    
>>
>>>Clif,
>>>It's been a while since I wrote that patch, and there were originally
>>>some errors in my code that botched the memory check, although it did
>>>enable the perfdata output correctly. However, this patch must be
>>>applied against the original stable release, I don't know how it will
>>>work against a CVS version of the stable code, which is what it
>>>appears as though you've used below. Also, perfdata and a few other
>>>things should be fixed in the latest CVS version of the 1.4.0-alpha
>>>plugins. I would suggest that you use those. If they don't work for
>>>you, send another email to the list, and perhaps copy the
>>>nagiosplug-users list to increase the pool of users that might be
>>>able to assist with the error. 
>>>
>>>Garry W. Cook, CCNA
>>>Network Infrastructure Manager
>>>MACTEC, Inc. - http://www.mactec.com/
>>>303.308.6228 (Office) - 720.220.1862 (Mobile)
>>>
>>>per...@li... wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>      
>>>
>>>>First of all, thanks again for PerfParse.  I'm hoping once I get my
>>>>ducks in a row with which plugins to use, etc., I'll replace
>>>>APAN with it.
>>>>
>>>>I tried the check_nt plugin with what I assume is the latest build,
>>>>but it didn't provide performance data.  I then tried to patch
>>>>check_nt with the patch on your site, but receive the following:
>>>>nagios-plugins-r1_3_0-200410041647]# patch plugins/check_nt.c
>>>>check_nt.c.patch patching file plugins/check_nt.c
>>>>Hunk #2 FAILED at 81.
>>>>Hunk #3 FAILED at 140.
>>>>Hunk #4 FAILED at 164.
>>>>Hunk #5 FAILED at 202.
>>>>Hunk #6 FAILED at 223.
>>>>Hunk #7 FAILED at 255.
>>>>Hunk #8 FAILED at 291.
>>>>Hunk #9 succeeded at 406 (offset 54 lines).
>>>>Hunk #10 FAILED at 599.
>>>>Hunk #11 FAILED at 626.
>>>>Hunk #12 FAILED at 636.
>>>>Hunk #13 FAILED at 646.
>>>>Hunk #14 FAILED at 666.
>>>>12 out of 14 hunks FAILED -- saving rejects to file
>>>>plugins/check_nt.c.rej 
>>>>
>>>>Here's the contents reject file:
>>>>***************
>>>>*** 78,89 ****
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>        
>>>>
>>>[snip]
>>>      
>>>
>
>  
>