RE: [Perfparse-users] Trouble patching check_nt to get perf data

[Cook, G. <GW...@ma...>]

That's the correct page. Just make sure you grab the 'HEAD' version,
which should be the absolute latest version, although not necessarily
stable. I believe that the version you grabbed was CVS of the old
plugins (v 1.3.0). I made this assumption based on the name of the
directory that you were working in,
nagios-plugins-r1_3_0-200410041647]#.

-g

Clif J. Smith wrote:
> Did I grab the "latest CVS version of the 1.4.0-alpha plugins" by
> grabbing those listed here:
> http://nagiosplug.sourceforge.net/snapshot/=20
>=20
> Is there somewhere else they'd be located?  I found that location off
> of the nagiosplugs web page saying it was the daily snapshot of
> what's in CVS.
>=20
> cjs
>=20
>=20
>=20
> Cook, Garry wrote:
>=20
>> Clif,
>> It's been a while since I wrote that patch, and there were originally
>> some errors in my code that botched the memory check, although it did
>> enable the perfdata output correctly. However, this patch must be
>> applied against the original stable release, I don't know how it will
>> work against a CVS version of the stable code, which is what it
>> appears as though you've used below. Also, perfdata and a few other
>> things should be fixed in the latest CVS version of the 1.4.0-alpha
>> plugins. I would suggest that you use those. If they don't work for
>> you, send another email to the list, and perhaps copy the
>> nagiosplug-users list to increase the pool of users that might be
>> able to assist with the error.=20
>>=20
>> Garry W. Cook, CCNA
>> Network Infrastructure Manager
>> MACTEC, Inc. - http://www.mactec.com/
>> 303.308.6228 (Office) - 720.220.1862 (Mobile)
>>=20
>> per...@li... wrote:
>>=20
>>=20
>>> First of all, thanks again for PerfParse.  I'm hoping once I get my
>>> ducks in a row with which plugins to use, etc., I'll replace
>>> APAN with it.
>>>=20
>>> I tried the check_nt plugin with what I assume is the latest build,
>>> but it didn't provide performance data.  I then tried to patch
>>> check_nt with the patch on your site, but receive the following:
>>> nagios-plugins-r1_3_0-200410041647]# patch plugins/check_nt.c
>>> check_nt.c.patch patching file plugins/check_nt.c
>>> Hunk #2 FAILED at 81.
>>> Hunk #3 FAILED at 140.
>>> Hunk #4 FAILED at 164.
>>> Hunk #5 FAILED at 202.
>>> Hunk #6 FAILED at 223.
>>> Hunk #7 FAILED at 255.
>>> Hunk #8 FAILED at 291.
>>> Hunk #9 succeeded at 406 (offset 54 lines).
>>> Hunk #10 FAILED at 599.
>>> Hunk #11 FAILED at 626.
>>> Hunk #12 FAILED at 636.
>>> Hunk #13 FAILED at 646.
>>> Hunk #14 FAILED at 666.
>>> 12 out of 14 hunks FAILED -- saving rejects to file
>>> plugins/check_nt.c.rej=20
>>>=20
>>> Here's the contents reject file:
>>> ***************
>>> *** 78,89 ****
>>>=20
>>>=20
>> [snip]