From: Ben C. <Be...@cl...> - 2004-09-11 04:20:24
|
Ricardo, The problem of the SIGHUP will be addressed in the near future. A version of PP which does not use this, and also imports data without delay, is in development. I have no data on how PP runs as far as heavy loading goes. It would be interesting to collect such data... If you or anybody else can tell us the speed and type of machine you have, operating system, memory, CPU. As well as Nagios data: Number of hosts, services and metrics, and average lines/minute Nagios adds to the log file. Whether you run PP and Nagios on the same machine or not. Finally the average load on your server. I can put any data you return to me in a table for general viewing. There is also CGI data. Speed of a standard graph (say 2 weeks data) to draw, and the size of the total database. Some people may want to suggest a better form on performance analysis :) But if you send it, I'll collate it. Regards, Ben. Ricardo David Martins wrote: > Ben, > > i am concerned with the SIGHUP to nagios process. When nagios shutsdown it > deletes the entire current status and so, it will lose any awaiting > requests. This > will imply nagios to reschedule all checks. > > Well, wont this badly increase the load? > > Does this function well with say 500 services on the same server? And > what about 5000? > > Do you know of any experience in a production environment with huge loads? > > Regards > |