Re: [Perfparse-users] Re: [Nagiosplug-devel] Performance output of the disk plugin

[Ben C. <Be...@cl...>]

Yes I know the check_disk returns the values upside down.  Very 
annoying!  Half my disks are showing up as CRITICAL too :)

I did post a bug about this, but not sure what happened to it.

It's early days yet for performance data, I am sure everything will fall 
into place over next few months.

I might even find time to add range support to PerfParse if it's 
important.  But please don't hold your breath!

Regards, Ben


Jaap Hogenberg wrote:

> On Thu, 2004-07-22 at 16:21, Ben Clewett wrote:
> 
>>Jaap,
>>
>> From the perspective of PerfParse, this unfortunately does not 
>>understand a range of data.  Due to a flaw in the original data 
>>structure, it can only store a single value each for the critical and 
>>warn values.  Further, it uses these to draw just single line on the 
>>graphs.  Considerable work would be required to rebuild the product for 
>>a range.
> 
> OK , I understand.
> 
> 
>>You are the first person I have ever seen who has requested support for 
>>this, and as far as I know, not a single plugin uses this format :)
> 
> Well, some of my custom check scripts do  ;-)
> Until I decided to rip that out , because it confused perfparse  :)
> 
> 
> 
>>I do note that the range you specify in this case adds no more 
>>information to the output than using threshold values.
> 
> Uhm, this particular case is a plugin that reports free space,
> so the tresholds are not "upper" treshold but lower tresholds,
> meaning that when the value drops BELOW the treshold, a warning or
> critical status should be set, with critical < warning
> 
> Just using the treshold values would generete these alerts when
> exceeding the tresholds. 
> That's why I though using ranges would be usefull.
> 
> Apart from that, the tresholds that this plugin generates are wrong
> anyway : it reports the free space, and the tresholds are not set
> to 30 and 10 % (in the example below) but to the values that would be
> correct when calculating USED space, i.e. 70 and 90 % 
> 
> All together, it sounds like we would be better of having a plugin that
> would report on used space percentages than free space .....
> 
> Regards, and thanks for the help
> 
> Jaap Hogenberg
> 
> 
>>Somebody here might correct me on this:  I believe the range is used 
>>where an OK range may be either side of a WARN range, which it's self is 
>>either side of a CRITICAL range.  Set by specifying overlapping ranges:
>>
>>  OK [-WARN--[--CRITIAL--]--WARN-] OK
>>
>>Or in reverse where the '@' is used: an OK range sits between a WARN 
>>range, which sits between a CRITICAL range:
>>
>>---CRITICAL-]--WARN-] OK [-WARN--[-CRITIAL---
>>
>>I do wish to support this one day in PerfParse as this is a powerful 
>>option.  If any person here can shine a light on how the ranges should 
>>correctly be used, and how to understand overlapping ranges, and most 
>>important, will standard plugins be written to use these, and if so, 
>>when?  I would be interested in knowing :)
>>
>>Regards, Ben.
>>
>>
>>Jaap Hogenberg wrote:
>>
>>
>>>Hi,
>>>
>>>While playing with perfparse 0.99.01 and the nagios plugin check_disk ,
>>>it occurs to me that the performance data for this plugin is not
>>>correct. When I run the plugin, this is what I get:
>>>( currently using check_disk 1.42 from plugins 1.4.0alpha2 )
>>>
>>>
>>>nagios@gilmore:~/cvs/nagiosplug/plugins$ ./check_disk -w 30% -c 10% -p /
>>>DISK OK - free space: / 8171 MB (85%);| /=8170MB;6728;8650;0;9612
>>>
>>>>From the "plugin developers doc" I gather that the second and third
>>>field in the performance data output should be of the "range type"
>>>and since we are working with "free space" any value bigger than 
>>>the warning and critical tresholds is good , so we need to alert 
>>>when the value is inside a range using the "@" sign....
>>>
>>>This means the "warn" field should contain  @((max * 100)/10:((max *
>>>100)/30)
>>>and the "crit" field should show @[0:]((max * 100) /10
>>>
>>>in values:   .... | /=8170MB;@961:2884;@0:961;0;9612
>>>
>>>Is this right ?
>>>
>>>I have tried to change the code myself, so that I could supply 
>>>patches, but my C coding skills are lousy.
>>>
>>>I would appriciate the help, and many thanks for the great work done
>>>allready!
>>>
>>>Regards,
>>>Jaap Hogenberg
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>-------------------------------------------------------
>>>This SF.Net email is sponsored by BEA Weblogic Workshop
>>>FREE Java Enterprise J2EE developer tools!
>>>Get your free copy of BEA WebLogic Workshop 8.1 today.
>>>http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=4721&alloc_id=10040&op=click
>>>_______________________________________________
>>>Nagiosplug-devel mailing list
>>>Nag...@li...
>>>https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nagiosplug-devel
>>>::: Please include plugins version (-v) and OS when reporting any issue. 
>>>::: Messages without supporting info will risk being sent to /dev/null
>>>
>>
> 
> 
> 
> -------------------------------------------------------
> This SF.Net email is sponsored by BEA Weblogic Workshop
> FREE Java Enterprise J2EE developer tools!
> Get your free copy of BEA WebLogic Workshop 8.1 today.
> http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=4721&alloc_id=10040&op=click
> _______________________________________________
> Perfparse-users mailing list
> Per...@li...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/perfparse-users
>