[Perfparse-users] Re: [perfparse - Help] RE: Missing metrics?

[Ben C. <Be...@cl...>]

Jason,

1.  You will have to check the metrics and see what they give.  I 
believe they are trying to get 100% coverage of the plugins.  So even if 
not now, definitely soon.  Any missing ones, drop them an email to their 
mailing list, I am sure they will give you a polite reply.  Certainly I 
have found all the UNIX ones for checking the basics are all working.

2.  Yes, you can use them.  But might be a good idea to compile in 
parallel with stable ones.  Any which don't work, copy over from stable 
release.  But I would be surprised if you have to.

Thanks greatly for the complement!

Regards, Ben.

SourceForge.net wrote:

> Read and respond to this message at: 
> https://sourceforge.net/forum/message.php?msg_id=2605701
> By: jasonashworth
> 
> Had a feeling that might be it...
> 
> So, last two questions - 
> 1. What performance data will I be able to extract from this snapshot of the
> plugins (doesn't detail much in the changelog) - what I really need to be able
> to graph is things like CPU use, and disk space usage on NT and NW boxes...
> 2. Do you reckon these plugins are stable enough for production use?
> 
> Thanks for the help, and once again, keep up the good work on a great
> project...!
> 
> ______________________________________________________________________
> You are receiving this email because you elected to monitor this forum.
> To stop monitoring this forum, login to SourceForge.net and visit: 
> https://sourceforge.net/forum/unmonitor.php?forum_id=375250
>