Re: [Perfparse-devel] Perfparse : annoucement howto wiki in french

[Florian G. <fl...@re...>]

Hi C=E9dric,

i did not yet have time to look at your modifications in detail. I doubt
that it would be easy to merge your modifications with mine, but i'd
like to try to merge the best and leave the rest. But what i'd like most
is that if you have some more time you could help us to develop
perfparse further. I have many ideas and need help, and i bet you have
some more ideas too.

So at the moment i'm working on
- a new database schema that relies on id columns as primary keys
- a new web interface based on php (with smarty as template engine)

The graph generating cgi should stay as C for performance reasons. You
can look at the development versions in sourceforge CVS or download a
snapshot here:
http://perfparse.de/cvs_snapshots/
Within the archive you'll find doc/database/database_schema_v20.odp
(Open Office Presentation) with the new schema.

Send me your sourceforge username and you can get CVS write access if
you want to merge your changes (with care ;-)).

This week i'm low on time but i'll try to look at your changes and
answer all questions.

Flo



C=E9dric Temple wrote:
> On Lun 12 f=E9vrier 2007 11:03, Yves Mettier wrote:
>> Hi Cedric and Tony,
>=20
> Hi,
>=20
> Thanks for my poor english.
>=20
>=20
>> We heard of the Nareto project that seems to include perfparse.
>> 1st thing : on the page http://www.nareto.org/?a=3Dlinks, the perfpars=
e.org
>> domain name
>> was not renewed (nobody to pay for). Could you update the link Perfpar=
se to
>> http://perfparse.sourceforge.net/ ?
>=20
> Sorry, we haven't see the change. We do this ASAP. Thanks for the notic=
e.
>=20
>=20
>=20
>> Then, Jean-Jacques Siquet told us about Cedric's page
>> http://cedrictemple.info/Supervision/Perfparse/amelioration_des_perfor=
mances.php.
>>
>> There are patches for perfparse. Why wouldn't you commit them in the C=
VS on
>> sourceforge ?
>=20
> Yes... i do the patch. But, because of i'm not a good C developer, i'm =
not
> sure the code i made is good. I think new bugs could be present with th=
is
> patch. Since i have done this job, i want to rewrite the patch, do a go=
od
> documentation and send you the patch. But i have no time to do all the =
work.
>=20
> If you want, i can send you the patch. If you have question, you can se=
nd it
> to me but i am not sure to give you a response in good time.
>=20
>=20
>> Somebody could then make a new version with them and release ?
>=20
> Yes of course! :-)
>=20
>=20