From: Ben C. <Be...@cl...> - 2004-06-30 07:19:42
|
Hi Chris, I am very excited about the possibility of porting to Oracle. It had always been an aim to support many DBMS platforms. Nobody has yet had a go at this, so you are welcome to have a go. I have never heard of libdbi, I'll have to take a look. We do want support for PostgreSQL, Fireblade, Interbase and others. If this lib offers an easy way to do this, then all the better. But I do echo Yves comments that it may be better for the product to use the basic c API from Oracle. You will be able to take advantage of the abilities of the API's which a generic API might not have. Stability, speed, special cursors etc. We are tying to release version 0.0.11 at the moment. I would not advise any work until then. However, you may want to have a look at the current code and judge how much of an effort this will be. If you do choose to work with us, you will of course be credited as an author and developer in all the usual places. Kind regards, Ben You Chris Donovan wrote: > Greetings, > > I am looking at using PerfParse with Nagios but I would rather store the > data in an Oracle database instead of MySQL. Is there anybody that is > already working on this? Also, is there any reason not to use libdbi so > that the PerfParse code is database independent? > > I'm more then willing to write the code for this, I just want to make > sure that I'm not duplicating someone else's efforts or missing a > fundamental problem with using libdbi. Thanks. > > Chris Donovan > > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > This SF.Net email sponsored by Black Hat Briefings & Training. > Attend Black Hat Briefings & Training, Las Vegas July 24-29 - digital > self defense, top technical experts, no vendor pitches, unmatched > networking opportunities. Visit www.blackhat.com > _______________________________________________ > Perfparse-devel mailing list > Per...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/perfparse-devel > |