PDL::Dataflow needs to be gone over with a fine-toothed comb. For example, the DESCRIPTION section is just wrong. Probably the rest of the document could be updated for what actually got implemented, not just Tuomas' now 14-year-old vision of what might be done, but wasn't. Dataflow is potentially confusing enough without having an outdated manual.
Setting priority to 3 because, well... it's been 14 years, so we're obviously not in too much of a rush.
Log in to post a comment.