#57 Rewrite PDL/Dataflow.pod

None
open
nobody
None
9
2014-12-20
2011-09-17
Derek Lamb
No

PDL::Dataflow needs to be gone over with a fine-toothed comb. For example, the DESCRIPTION section is just wrong. Probably the rest of the document could be updated for what actually got implemented, not just Tuomas' now 14-year-old vision of what might be done, but wasn't. Dataflow is potentially confusing enough without having an outdated manual.

Setting priority to 3 because, well... it's been 14 years, so we're obviously not in too much of a rush.

Discussion

  • Chris Marshall

    Chris Marshall - 2011-09-17
    • summary: Rewrite PDL::Dataflow --> Rewrite PDL/Dataflow.pod
     
  • Chris Marshall

    Chris Marshall - 2014-12-20
    • Group: -->
    • Priority: 3 --> 9
     
  • Chris Marshall

    Chris Marshall - 2014-12-20

    Upping priority. Maybe it'll make PDL-2.008...

     

Log in to post a comment.

Get latest updates about Open Source Projects, Conferences and News.

Sign up for the SourceForge newsletter:





No, thanks