#339 PDL::Complex support is inconsistent and incomplete


This is from a posting by Luis Mochon on the perldl mailing list
at http://mailman.jach.hawaii.edu/pipermail/perldl/2013-August/008103.html
on some issues with the current PDL::Complex implementation and excerpted

I found an strange behavior in PDL::Complex.
(I'm running PDL v2.006 under perl5 (revision 5 version 16 subversion 1))

To illustrate this behavior, I declare a 1D complex array from a 2D real pdl:

 pdl> $a=sequence(2,3)->cplx
 pdl> p $a
 [0 +1i  2 +3i  4 +5i]

 # Pdl allows me to transpose the array, as if it were an ordinary 2x3 pdl:
 pdl> p $a->transpose
  [0 2 4]
  [1 3 5]
 # but it doesn't realize that after transposition it is no longer a 1D
 # complex array

 pdl> p $a->transpose->info
 PDL::Complex: Double D [3,2]


  • W_Luis

    W_Luis - 2014-09-01

    Another inconsistent and sometimes wrong behavior:

    pdl> $a=sequence(3)+i*2*sequence(3)                                                                                                                    
    pdl> p $a #three complex numbers                                                                                                                       
    [0 +0i  1 +2i  2 +4i]                                                                                                                                  
    pdl> p $a->sumover #complex sums over index 1, not 0                                                                                                   
    3 +6i                                                                                                                                                  
    pdl> p $a->prodover #real product over index 0, not 1                                                                                                  
    [0 2 8]                                                                                                                                                
    pdl> p $a->prodover->info                                                                                                                              
    PDL::Complex: Double D [3] #Complex number with three components!

    sumover yields an expected result, i.e., the complex sum of three complex
    numbers, but prodover sums over index 0, i.e., multiplies real times
    imaginary parts, yielding three real numbers, which are nevertheless
    interpreted as a complex number!

  • W_Luis

    W_Luis - 2014-09-01

    I just noticed there is a Cprodover function in PDL::Complex that does
    what I expected prodover would do. Maybe they should be synonyms when
    acting on a complex type. I also noticed that the code for sum works
    only on 2D complex arrays (i.e., 3D piddles), not for the general n-D

  • Chris Marshall

    Chris Marshall - 2015-02-22

    Not planned to address for PDL-2.008

  • Chris Marshall

    Chris Marshall - 2015-02-22
    • Priority: 5 --> 3
  • Chris Marshall

    Chris Marshall - 2015-08-16
    • Group: critical --> normal

Log in to post a comment.

Get latest updates about Open Source Projects, Conferences and News.

Sign up for the SourceForge newsletter:

JavaScript is required for this form.

No, thanks