Re: [pdl-stats] ols and missing values

[Maggie X. <mag...@us...>]

Hi Ingo,

Thanks for working out the issue! If you fork from the original pdl-stats
repo and push your change to the forked repo, you can then send me a link
to the commit where you've made the change. Or, if you don't want to deal
with git, you can email me the pp code and I'll take a look. Thanks!

Here<http://net.tutsplus.com/tutorials/other/easy-version-control-with-git/>'s
a simple git tutorial if you want to know the basics. There's a section on
github.


Best,
Maggie


On Mon, Mar 18, 2013 at 6:23 AM, Ingo Schmid <in...@gm...> wrote:

>  Hi,
>
> recently I've needed some simple pearson's correlations and found out
> that ols can't handle missing values elegantly. fill_m doesn't do the job
> if you need also p-values. So I changed ols to filter rows from y and ivs
> that contain bad values, then clear the flag before continuing. This is
> based on a flag.
>
> Thing is, I've never used git so far, I managed to clone and pull, but am
> unsure about how to commit GLM.pp and push it to the server for you to
> review.
>
> Thanks
> Ingo
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Everyone hates slow websites. So do we.
> Make your web apps faster with AppDynamics
> Download AppDynamics Lite for free today:
> http://p.sf.net/sfu/appdyn_d2d_mar
> _______________________________________________
> pdl-stats-help mailing list
> pdl...@li...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/pdl-stats-help
>
>