You can subscribe to this list here.
| 2006 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
(1) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2007 |
Jan
(21) |
Feb
(36) |
Mar
(24) |
Apr
(36) |
May
(38) |
Jun
(32) |
Jul
(14) |
Aug
(34) |
Sep
(12) |
Oct
(15) |
Nov
(8) |
Dec
(6) |
| 2008 |
Jan
(27) |
Feb
(16) |
Mar
(18) |
Apr
(14) |
May
(20) |
Jun
(8) |
Jul
(20) |
Aug
(27) |
Sep
(15) |
Oct
(23) |
Nov
(2) |
Dec
|
| 2009 |
Jan
(11) |
Feb
(22) |
Mar
(11) |
Apr
|
May
(18) |
Jun
(5) |
Jul
(2) |
Aug
(25) |
Sep
(27) |
Oct
(4) |
Nov
(4) |
Dec
(2) |
| 2010 |
Jan
(7) |
Feb
(3) |
Mar
(5) |
Apr
(23) |
May
(27) |
Jun
(12) |
Jul
(11) |
Aug
(7) |
Sep
|
Oct
(28) |
Nov
(74) |
Dec
(11) |
| 2011 |
Jan
(64) |
Feb
(4) |
Mar
(20) |
Apr
(17) |
May
(11) |
Jun
|
Jul
(9) |
Aug
|
Sep
(20) |
Oct
(1) |
Nov
(1) |
Dec
|
| 2012 |
Jan
(2) |
Feb
(3) |
Mar
(4) |
Apr
(2) |
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
(6) |
Aug
(1) |
Sep
(2) |
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
(4) |
| 2013 |
Jan
(3) |
Feb
(4) |
Mar
(2) |
Apr
|
May
(2) |
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
(1) |
Sep
(1) |
Oct
|
Nov
(1) |
Dec
|
| 2014 |
Jan
|
Feb
(1) |
Mar
(4) |
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
(1) |
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
| 2015 |
Jan
(1) |
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
(6) |
May
(2) |
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
(1) |
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
| 2016 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
(1) |
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
| 2017 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
(2) |
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
| 2019 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
(1) |
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
| 2020 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
(1) |
Dec
|
| 2022 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
(2) |
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
|
From: Scott K. <sko...@pr...> - 2013-05-15 04:48:11
|
"separete" should be "separate" on http://pdfedit.cz/en/index.html Best, Scott |
|
From: drew R. <zo...@gm...> - 2013-05-13 23:38:38
|
I have a program that creates a pdf file for mailing labels. (21 pages currently.) We will be required to print these at least monthly. This is the first day I have run into this. (It is a new version of the program.) The problem is that the text prints just a little bit high so that a part of the first line is lost when the labels are peeled off and applied. Using pdfedit, I was able to click one Set Page Transformation Matrix, then click on Translate (shift) page, from page 1 for 21 pages, then on the Page translation tab set ty to -10 and click OK. This looks like it worked. The thing is that I am not the person who needs to do this monthly and I would like to script this for them so that they drop the pdf in a net share and get the corrected pdf back in another share on in a web page. Is there a way to run pdf edit from the cli and give it the pdf file in question and a script that will accomplish this? I have looked through the info I can find so far on the web and do not see a hint as to how I might do this in any fashion and I am really looking for a someple fashion if one exists. all the best, drew -- http://freemusicpush.blogspot.com/ |
|
From: Michal H. <ms...@gm...> - 2013-03-20 12:23:46
|
On Wed, Mar 20, 2013 at 12:10:02PM +0100, l walmala wrote: > Hello, I have recently installed pdfedit. My system is Opensuse > 12.2. I would like to include texts in pdf documents. After I add > new text, and hit the save to file button, the new pdf is created, > but it does not contain the modification when I open it with a pdf > viewer. Could you fix the problem? Thanks in advance. Could you share your document? Please post it off list, if yes. -- Michal Hocko |
|
From: l w. <wa...@fr...> - 2013-03-20 11:10:11
|
Hello, I have recently installed pdfedit. My system is Opensuse 12.2. I would like to include texts in pdf documents. After I add new text, and hit the save to file button, the new pdf is created, but it does not contain the modification when I open it with a pdf viewer. Could you fix the problem? Thanks in advance. |
|
From: Jeffrey W. <nol...@gm...> - 2013-02-09 03:21:25
|
Hi All, I created a PDF from a few smaller PDFs. I want to add page numbers. I tried to locate a method to add page numbers through the man pages and documents on use (http://pdfedit.cz/en/user_doc.html). But I was not successful. I took a few stabs in the dark by trying to script it though, but I was not successful (I could not locate man pages on script commands). Could anyone point out how to add page numbers? Jeff |
|
From: Alejandro R. E. <are...@gm...> - 2013-02-05 02:46:58
|
...well, I guess I know what was going wrong with my code: QSPdfOperator
doesn't have a copy constructor (and for some reason, it seems to be needed
for passing objects between C++ and QSA sides).
Now I am dealing with a "funny" thing:
I am extending QSPage somehow:
void QSPage::f() {
...
boost::shared_ptr<PdfOperator> op(...);
libs::Rectangle bbox = op->getBBox();
printf(" [ %f , %f , %f , %f ] \n", bbox.xleft, bbox.yleft,
bbox.xright, bbox.yright);
}
The thing is, I am getting two different results depending on _when_ I
invoke that function:
If I run pdfedit and open some PDF file, and execute the following (into
the script console):
p = document.getPage(5);
p.f();
then I can obtain something like:
[ 393.760000 , 734.615000 , 495.829000 , 744.668000 ]
but if I run pdfedit and open the same PDF file and before executing those
lines, first I change the current page (on the GUI) to the fifth page (the
page I am processing), then I obtain this:
[ 393.760000 , 784.615000 , 495.829000 , 794.668000 ]
The difference is on the y-axis (50 units more). Why? How can I simulate
it? The problem is that the real values are those last ones... I already
noticed that this whole thing is too tied to GUI, but I don't see any point
in which some 'current GUI page'-dependent code could mess up the results :(
Any help?
Thanks in advance.
On Sunday, February 3, 2013, Alejandro Ramos Encinosa wrote:
> Hello guys.
>
> I am still on my looong way to code some automated redaction tool.
> So far, I am able to redact simple texts (i.e., simple/single 'Tj'
> operators). But now I face the fact that there are some texts to whom I
> can't apply the same technique: complex 'Tj' operators. I was looking
> deeply into 'pdfedit' source and I found a piece of code that do what I
> need, except for the fact that it is too tied to GUI (or at least, that's
> what I reach to understand) :(
> I "sweep" a bit and now I have, in one hand, a QSA script with the right
> functionality, and in the other hand, some C++ code extending somehow the
> current 'pdfedit' version. But there is something left: the QSA part needs
> all the involved QSPdfOperators, but I don't know how to ...return them?
> emit them? from the C++ code (where I have a collection of the involved
> PdfOperators --note the lack of 'QS' preffix). How can I just create a new
> instance of a QSPdfOperator having a PdfOperator? I tried this:
> ...
> BaseCore *bc = new BaseCore();
> boost::shared_ptr<PdfOperator> textOp;
> ...
> return QSPdfOperator(textOp, bc);
>
> but I got:
>
> error: no matching function for call to
> ‘gui::QSPdfOperator::QSPdfOperator(gui::QSPdfOperator)’
> note: candidates are:
> ...
> note:
> gui::QSPdfOperator::QSPdfOperator(boost::shared_ptr<pdfobjects::PdfOperator>,
> gui::BaseCore*)
> note: candidate expects 2 arguments, 1 provided
>
> What is wrong? I am missing something for sure, but I don't know what it
> is :(
> Could you help me, please?
>
> Thanks in advance.
> Best regards.
>
> On Wednesday, December 26, 2012, Jozef M. wrote:
>
>> Dne 12/24/2012 11:52 PM, Alejandro Ramos Encinosa napsal(a):
>> > Well, I just realize that there is a "flatten" tool that:
>> > - ask for an existing (PDF) file path; and then
>> > - ask for an output (PDF) file path; and then
>> > - save into the second file the last version of every object into the
>> > first file.
>> > So, this seems to do what I need, but not in the way I expected to: do
>> > I really need to save the current changes, and then invoke the flatten
>> > tool with the file path? Am I really unable to just process the
>> > current (in-memory) document?
>> >
>> > Any way, all I need now is to know how to script my goal:
>> > - open a PDF file;
>> > - make some texts replacements;
>> > - (optionally) draw lines/rects at fixed positions;
>> > - save the document ensuring that it will contain just one revision.
>> > The only way I know so far for achieving this, is to save first the
>> > document with new revisions and then pass its path to the flatten
>> > tool, but even this way, I don't know how to write an script for all
>> > this. Any help?
>>
>> Hi Ale,
>>
>> regarding scripting see
>> http://pdfedit.petricek.net/wiki/ScriptingAddNewScript
>>
>> regarding flattening, that is how it is done, if you know c++ it should
>> be pretty simple, probably not effective though.
>>
>> Jozef
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> >
>> > In the meanwhile, I will look deep into the code trying to find a way
>> > to use a shortcut.
>> >
>> >
>> > On 12/23/12, Alejandro Ramos Encinosa <are...@gm...> wrote:
>> >> Hi all.
>> >>
>> >> As far as I've read, once we save all changes, a new revision is
>> created.
>> >> My goal is to "rewrite" the current content instead of creating a new
>> >> revision into the document: lets say I "spellcheck" the content of the
>> >> document, I need then to be able to save the changes in a way in which
>> >> the wrong words are no longer into the final PDF. Is there any way in
>> >> which I can accomplish it?
>> >>
>> >> In the case in which the current pdfedit implementation doesn't cover
>> >> such functionality, what should I modify to get the expected result?
>> >>
>> >> Thanks in advance.
>> >>
>> >> --
>> >> Ale
>> >>
>> >
>>
>>
>>
>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>> LogMeIn Rescue: Anywhere, Anytime Remote support for IT. Free Trial
>> Remotely access PCs and mobile devices and provide instant support
>> Improve your efficiency, and focus on delivering more value-add services
>> Discover what IT Professionals Know. Rescue delivers
>> http://p.sf.net/sfu/logmein_12329d2d
>> _______________________________________________
>> Pdfedit-support mailing list
>> Pdf...@li...
>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/pdfedit-support
>>
>
>
> --
> Ale
>
>
>
--
Ale
|
|
From: Andor H. <and...@la...> - 2013-02-04 19:58:32
|
Hello, I am looking for a way to script the selection of all graphical operators within a pre-defined rectangular area in the current page. Doing it by hand (LMB pressed and drag) works, but I would perfer not to have to do this for every page in a 390 page document. Does anyone have a suggested code-snippet for me to work with? I find nothing in the documentation. I am fighting a deadline, so rapid answers would be HIGHLY appreciated. Mit freundlichen Grüßen / Best Regards, Andor Holtsmark |
|
From: Alejandro R. E. <are...@gm...> - 2013-02-04 01:37:03
|
Hello guys. I am still on my looong way to code some automated redaction tool. So far, I am able to redact simple texts (i.e., simple/single 'Tj' operators). But now I face the fact that there are some texts to whom I can't apply the same technique: complex 'Tj' operators. I was looking deeply into 'pdfedit' source and I found a piece of code that do what I need, except for the fact that it is too tied to GUI (or at least, that's what I reach to understand) :( I "sweep" a bit and now I have, in one hand, a QSA script with the right functionality, and in the other hand, some C++ code extending somehow the current 'pdfedit' version. But there is something left: the QSA part needs all the involved QSPdfOperators, but I don't know how to ...return them? emit them? from the C++ code (where I have a collection of the involved PdfOperators --note the lack of 'QS' preffix). How can I just create a new instance of a QSPdfOperator having a PdfOperator? I tried this: ... BaseCore *bc = new BaseCore(); boost::shared_ptr<PdfOperator> textOp; ... return QSPdfOperator(textOp, bc); but I got: error: no matching function for call to ‘gui::QSPdfOperator::QSPdfOperator(gui::QSPdfOperator)’ note: candidates are: ... note: gui::QSPdfOperator::QSPdfOperator(boost::shared_ptr<pdfobjects::PdfOperator>, gui::BaseCore*) note: candidate expects 2 arguments, 1 provided What is wrong? I am missing something for sure, but I don't know what it is :( Could you help me, please? Thanks in advance. Best regards. On Wednesday, December 26, 2012, Jozef M. wrote: > Dne 12/24/2012 11:52 PM, Alejandro Ramos Encinosa napsal(a): > > Well, I just realize that there is a "flatten" tool that: > > - ask for an existing (PDF) file path; and then > > - ask for an output (PDF) file path; and then > > - save into the second file the last version of every object into the > > first file. > > So, this seems to do what I need, but not in the way I expected to: do > > I really need to save the current changes, and then invoke the flatten > > tool with the file path? Am I really unable to just process the > > current (in-memory) document? > > > > Any way, all I need now is to know how to script my goal: > > - open a PDF file; > > - make some texts replacements; > > - (optionally) draw lines/rects at fixed positions; > > - save the document ensuring that it will contain just one revision. > > The only way I know so far for achieving this, is to save first the > > document with new revisions and then pass its path to the flatten > > tool, but even this way, I don't know how to write an script for all > > this. Any help? > > Hi Ale, > > regarding scripting see > http://pdfedit.petricek.net/wiki/ScriptingAddNewScript > > regarding flattening, that is how it is done, if you know c++ it should > be pretty simple, probably not effective though. > > Jozef > > > > > > > > > In the meanwhile, I will look deep into the code trying to find a way > > to use a shortcut. > > > > > > On 12/23/12, Alejandro Ramos Encinosa <are...@gm...<javascript:;>> > wrote: > >> Hi all. > >> > >> As far as I've read, once we save all changes, a new revision is > created. > >> My goal is to "rewrite" the current content instead of creating a new > >> revision into the document: lets say I "spellcheck" the content of the > >> document, I need then to be able to save the changes in a way in which > >> the wrong words are no longer into the final PDF. Is there any way in > >> which I can accomplish it? > >> > >> In the case in which the current pdfedit implementation doesn't cover > >> such functionality, what should I modify to get the expected result? > >> > >> Thanks in advance. > >> > >> -- > >> Ale > >> > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > LogMeIn Rescue: Anywhere, Anytime Remote support for IT. Free Trial > Remotely access PCs and mobile devices and provide instant support > Improve your efficiency, and focus on delivering more value-add services > Discover what IT Professionals Know. Rescue delivers > http://p.sf.net/sfu/logmein_12329d2d > _______________________________________________ > Pdfedit-support mailing list > Pdf...@li... <javascript:;> > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/pdfedit-support > -- Ale |
|
From: puppyite <th...@em...> - 2013-01-30 23:24:53
|
puppyite <theonly@...> writes: > > Hi, > I can add text without issue. > > If I delete part of a text everything below will not display on my Kindle. > If I add text with the Add Text button everything below that will not display. > This issue only applies to the pages I have edited. > All other pages before and after the edited page display normally. > In either case the PDF displays normally in PDF reader on my PC. > I note that existing text has many string parameters. > The edited or added text has none. > I have no idea what that means. I think it is the source of the problem. > If this is the problem I haven’t been able to fix it. > I’m using PDFedit 0.4.3 in Puppy Linux. > I got this from my distro’s repository. > I will not be able to obtain a later version. > Thank you for your help. This time I tried editing my own PDF. I selected a line of text. The text appeared in the box just above the document window. I edited the text and pressed Enter. The text on the document then disappeared. Either I am doing something or the software is broken. |
|
From: puppyite <th...@em...> - 2013-01-30 18:45:05
|
Hi, I can add text without issue. If I delete part of a text everything below will not display on my Kindle. If I add text with the Add Text button everything below that will not display. This issue only applies to the pages I have edited. All other pages before and after the edited page display normally. In either case the PDF displays normally in PDF reader on my PC. I note that existing text has many string parameters. The edited or added text has none. I have no idea what that means. I think it is the source of the problem. If this is the problem I haven’t been able to fix it. I’m using PDFedit 0.4.3 in Puppy Linux. I got this from my distro’s repository. I will not be able to obtain a later version. Thank you for your help. |
|
From: Kurkowski, T. <Tho...@me...> - 2013-01-15 08:20:31
|
Hi @all, Is it possible with pdfedit to find text within a pdf document and highlight it (yellow, red..) without opening a gui? What I want to do: In the first step I want to highlight the word "hello" within the document test.pdf In the next step I want to highlight the word "hello" not only once, but every "hello" within the document. The last step would be to have a list of words and/or phrases which would be searched, marked and highlighted within a document without opening a gui. Is it possible to do this with the pdfedit library? If a gui is necessary to edit the documents, how can I use the already available commands "search, multiselect and highlight" within a plugin? Kind regards, Thomas |
|
From: Alejandro R. E. <are...@gm...> - 2012-12-31 00:16:58
|
I am not so sure if this have sense from pdfedit architecture perspective, but it does for me :( Like I mentioned before (https://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/message.php?msg_id=30269225), I need to draw rectangles. From the GUI console, 'drawRect' does what I need, but when I try to use it from a script, then I get "! TypeError. 'drawRect' undefined or not a function". How can I access to such functionality? Is there any other way to draw rectangles into a specific page? Thanks in advance. -- Ale |
|
From: Jozef M. <mis...@ho...> - 2012-12-26 13:05:43
|
Dne 12/24/2012 11:52 PM, Alejandro Ramos Encinosa napsal(a): > Well, I just realize that there is a "flatten" tool that: > - ask for an existing (PDF) file path; and then > - ask for an output (PDF) file path; and then > - save into the second file the last version of every object into the > first file. > So, this seems to do what I need, but not in the way I expected to: do > I really need to save the current changes, and then invoke the flatten > tool with the file path? Am I really unable to just process the > current (in-memory) document? > > Any way, all I need now is to know how to script my goal: > - open a PDF file; > - make some texts replacements; > - (optionally) draw lines/rects at fixed positions; > - save the document ensuring that it will contain just one revision. > The only way I know so far for achieving this, is to save first the > document with new revisions and then pass its path to the flatten > tool, but even this way, I don't know how to write an script for all > this. Any help? Hi Ale, regarding scripting see http://pdfedit.petricek.net/wiki/ScriptingAddNewScript regarding flattening, that is how it is done, if you know c++ it should be pretty simple, probably not effective though. Jozef > > In the meanwhile, I will look deep into the code trying to find a way > to use a shortcut. > > > On 12/23/12, Alejandro Ramos Encinosa <are...@gm...> wrote: >> Hi all. >> >> As far as I've read, once we save all changes, a new revision is created. >> My goal is to "rewrite" the current content instead of creating a new >> revision into the document: lets say I "spellcheck" the content of the >> document, I need then to be able to save the changes in a way in which >> the wrong words are no longer into the final PDF. Is there any way in >> which I can accomplish it? >> >> In the case in which the current pdfedit implementation doesn't cover >> such functionality, what should I modify to get the expected result? >> >> Thanks in advance. >> >> -- >> Ale >> > |
|
From: Alejandro R. E. <are...@gm...> - 2012-12-24 22:52:16
|
Well, I just realize that there is a "flatten" tool that: - ask for an existing (PDF) file path; and then - ask for an output (PDF) file path; and then - save into the second file the last version of every object into the first file. So, this seems to do what I need, but not in the way I expected to: do I really need to save the current changes, and then invoke the flatten tool with the file path? Am I really unable to just process the current (in-memory) document? Any way, all I need now is to know how to script my goal: - open a PDF file; - make some texts replacements; - (optionally) draw lines/rects at fixed positions; - save the document ensuring that it will contain just one revision. The only way I know so far for achieving this, is to save first the document with new revisions and then pass its path to the flatten tool, but even this way, I don't know how to write an script for all this. Any help? In the meanwhile, I will look deep into the code trying to find a way to use a shortcut. On 12/23/12, Alejandro Ramos Encinosa <are...@gm...> wrote: > Hi all. > > As far as I've read, once we save all changes, a new revision is created. > My goal is to "rewrite" the current content instead of creating a new > revision into the document: lets say I "spellcheck" the content of the > document, I need then to be able to save the changes in a way in which > the wrong words are no longer into the final PDF. Is there any way in > which I can accomplish it? > > In the case in which the current pdfedit implementation doesn't cover > such functionality, what should I modify to get the expected result? > > Thanks in advance. > > -- > Ale > -- Ale |
|
From: Alejandro R. E. <are...@gm...> - 2012-12-23 23:55:51
|
Hi all. As far as I've read, once we save all changes, a new revision is created. My goal is to "rewrite" the current content instead of creating a new revision into the document: lets say I "spellcheck" the content of the document, I need then to be able to save the changes in a way in which the wrong words are no longer into the final PDF. Is there any way in which I can accomplish it? In the case in which the current pdfedit implementation doesn't cover such functionality, what should I modify to get the expected result? Thanks in advance. -- Ale |
|
From: pete h. <sa...@ru...> - 2012-09-16 05:47:56
|
Hey,
I have built pdfedit under Slackware 13.37 64 bit using the
Slackbuild qt3 support.
When I bring up the GUI, certain icons on the tool bar are there
only in outline.
These icon correspond to menu entries in the pdfeditrc file
which have an "item classes" field after the icon field.
i.e the icon in the following line displays correctly in the
toolbar:-
closew = item Close Window , closewindow , , close.png
whereas the icon in THIS line does not:-
reloadpage = item Reload Page (show changes), go(), F5 , reload.png ,need_page_rw
If I remove the ',need_page_rw' from the line, then the icon
displays properly.
I dont like to remove these items from the rc file just to get the
GUI to look nice so does anyone have a proper solution?
cheers
pete
--
pete hilton
San Jose, CA
sa...@ru...
IsaBella --- ICE Explorer #1070
|
|
From: pete h. <sa...@ru...> - 2012-09-16 05:46:04
|
Hey,
I have built pdfedit under Slackware 13.37 64 bit using the
Slackbuild qt3 support.
When I bring up the GUI, certain icons on the tool bar are there
only in outline.
These icon correspond to menu entries in the pdfeditrc file
which have an "item classes" field after the icon field.
i.e the icon in the following line displays correctly in the
toolbar:-
closew = item Close Window , closewindow , , close.png
whereas the icon in THIS line does not:-
reloadpage = item Reload Page (show changes), go(), F5 , reload.png ,need_page_rw
If I remove the ',need_page_rw' from the line, then the icon
displays properly.
I dont like to remove these items from the rc file just to get the
GUI to look nice so does anyone have a proper solution?
cheers
pete
--
pete hilton
San Jose, CA
sa...@ru...
IsaBella --- ICE Explorer #1070
|
|
From: Francois C. <fra...@mi...> - 2012-08-29 08:28:18
|
Hello, as I am a newbye oin this forum, I apologize in advance if my question has already been solved. Of course, I already scrutinized both online Doc and forum archive, but unsucsessfully ;-) OK, let's go : I open a pdf document 'A.pdf' with the PDFEdit gui. My goal is to add pages from a second document 'B.pdf' For this, I use the menu Tool>Insert Pages from other Document (sorry, the translation is may be inaccurate, as I use the French version) I get a new window, where I can indeed choose 'B.pdf', and then I find two columns of page numbers : the left one seems to be for the source document (B.pdf). There I can click indeed page numbers here (but one by one :-( The right colums appears to be for the destination document (A.pdf), but it remains empty... Any idea ? Thanks a lot in advance ! Otherwise this soft is really a good job !! All the best, François -- Pr. François CAUNEAU CEP - Ecole des Mines de Paris Tel: 33 1 40 51 91 82 / 33 4 93 95 74 60 Fax 33 4 93 95 75 35 Courriel: fra...@mi... |
|
From: Michal H. <ms...@gm...> - 2012-07-17 15:44:04
|
On Tue, Jul 17, 2012 at 12:34:58PM +0200, Juan Miguel Jimenez wrote: > Hello, Hi, > Im trying to use pdfedit on a wheezy box. I have seen that qt3 support has > been removed from wheezy and a package of pdfedit was, also, removed from > repo. Yes this is said but the current GUI depends on QT3 heavily and it is not trivial to port it to QT4. A new gui which popped out recently is not merged into the project yet because there is not enough man power to do that. > Have you some clue how can be pdfedit used on wheezy? I guess you can still get qt3 libraries from some repository and compile it locally. > I have tried putting qtdir=/usr/share/qt4 but doesnt work. I wish it would be so easy but it's not unfortunately. > > kind regards, > Juanmi. > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Live Security Virtual Conference > Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and > threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions > will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware > threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/ > _______________________________________________ > Pdfedit-support mailing list > Pdf...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/pdfedit-support -- Michal Hocko |
|
From: Juan M. J. <bod...@gm...> - 2012-07-17 10:35:09
|
Hello, Im trying to use pdfedit on a wheezy box. I have seen that qt3 support has been removed from wheezy and a package of pdfedit was, also, removed from repo. Have you some clue how can be pdfedit used on wheezy? I have tried putting qtdir=/usr/share/qt4 but doesnt work. kind regards, Juanmi. |
|
From: Juan M. J. <bod...@gm...> - 2012-07-12 13:15:03
|
On 12 July 2012 13:47, Eric Doviak <er...@do...> wrote: > On 07/12/2012 07:39 AM, Eric Doviak wrote: > >> I would like to know if there is any way to compare or make a diff with >>> the differents embbeded revisions contained in a pdf document. >>> >> > Whoops. I misunderstood. > > To my knowledge there are two possible ways. If difference in text content > is what you seek, then save to both PDFs to text files and take the diff. > > If difference in formatting is what you seek, ... you're on your own. > - eric > > Well What I really want to compare is the btree of both revisions to see what fields have been changed and which ones have been added, although it has little or no effect on visual way. |
|
From: Eric D. <er...@do...> - 2012-07-12 11:48:01
|
On 07/12/2012 07:39 AM, Eric Doviak wrote: >> I would like to know if there is any way to compare or make a diff >> with the differents embbeded revisions contained in a pdf document. Whoops. I misunderstood. To my knowledge there are two possible ways. If difference in text content is what you seek, then save to both PDFs to text files and take the diff. If difference in formatting is what you seek, ... you're on your own. - eric |
|
From: Eric D. <er...@do...> - 2012-07-12 11:39:22
|
On 07/12/2012 05:54 AM, Juan Miguel Jimenez wrote: > Hello everybody! hello > I would like to know if there is any way to compare or make a diff > with the differents embbeded revisions contained in a pdf document. That's PDFedit's best feature. It allows you to save revisions within a PDF. See quote below. Cheers, - eric http://pdfedit.petricek.net/bt/view.php?id=301 > Summary 0000301: File->Save a Copy doesn't save changes made > Description As a test, I edited a form and selected Save a Copy > and gave it a name. When I open the new file, it's only the original > blank form. > > I was expecting it to be the PDF form with the changes I'd made. then a little further down ... (0000776) hockm0bm 03-31-09 15:34 > As you may have guessed, I didn't read the manual. I just expected it to be > intuitive. I gather from the manual quotation that this is "normal" > behaviour, although I must confess I don't really understand the revisioning > system it mentions. Do not hesitate and ask about that on our pdfedit-support mailing list. > > From a purely intuitive point of view, "save a copy" implies (to me) > savinging a copy of the document you have in front of you, changes (edits) > and all. You are right. The name is rather misleading. Copy revision would be much more intuitive as this is exactly what is done. I will talk to the rest of the team about this change. Btw. Why do you use this functionality in the first place? > > While I suppose, technically, you can close the report since the behaviour is > apparently normal, I suspect it's going to cause further confusion among > those of us who simply want to edit a PDF form but who aren't otherwise > fluent in the technical details of PDFs. Are you OK with the renaming to Copy revision? |
|
From: Juan M. J. <bod...@gm...> - 2012-07-12 09:54:41
|
Hello everybody! I would like to know if there is any way to compare or make a diff with the differents embbeded revisions contained in a pdf document. Thank you very much. |
|
From: Michal H. <ms...@gm...> - 2012-04-24 20:43:58
|
On Tue, Apr 24, 2012 at 04:18:16AM -0700, André Kamara wrote: > Hi! Hi, > I recently edited a PDF with PDFedit and it displays perfectly using > Adobe Reader or Document Viewer. But when I use Mac's Preview the > formatting is totally messed up. > Can you please help me handle this? This might be a bug in Mac's Preview. Xpdf core (used by PDFedit as well) is more relaxed when it comes to reading not 100% correct documents but if your document looks correctly in Acrobat Reader then I would rather blame Mac's Preview. Acrobat Reader tends to be quite unforgiving when it comes to the specification compliance. > Thanks, > André. -- Michal Hocko |