[pclasses-devel] Re: IO

[stephan b. <st...@s1...>]

On Friday 31 December 2004 17:57, stephan beal wrote:
> i can understand the throwing of an IOError, but LogicError seems a
> bit too strict.
>
> Why not just make it a no-op for 2nd+ close()?

To make a real-life analogy: when closing a closed door, we don't 
actually change it's state. It's a no-op. Nobody is surprised enough to 
say, "hey! That's illogical!"

-- 
----- st...@s1...   http://s11n.net
"...pleasure is a grace and is not obedient to the commands
of the will." -- Alan W. Watts