From: stephan b. <st...@s1...> - 2004-12-23 23:40:10
|
Yo, Christian - yesterday you said you'd like the build to install the headers to prefix/include/pclasses2. If you still want to do that, can we rename include/pclasses? That would mean sed'ing the rest of the files to fix the path, but i think it is worth it. Optionally, keep include/pclasses and install under prefix/include/pclasses. This will of course break 1.x clients... Wait - no it won't: 1.x and 2.x use 100% different file names! All headers are now upper-case and libs are now libpclasses_xxx.so. So we could keep the headers under include/pclasses and <pclasses/...>, instead of pclasses2. Just let me know which one you prefer so i can change the build accordingly. See ya! -- ----- st...@s1... http://s11n.net "...pleasure is a grace and is not obedient to the commands of the will." -- Alan W. Watts |