From: SourceForge.net <no...@so...> - 2007-05-02 23:00:22
|
Data Bugs item #1375795, was opened at 2005-12-08 00:35 Message generated for change (Settings changed) made by frank_kliewe You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=750091&aid=1375795&group_id=25576 Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the comment thread, including the initial issue submission, for this request, not just the latest update. Category: Missing Source Information Group: For 5.12 Status: Open Resolution: None >Priority: 7 Private: No Submitted By: Andrew McDougall (tir-gwaith) Assigned to: Andrew McDougall (tir-gwaith) Summary: [Bastion Press] Faeries cleanup Initial Comment: Lots of Prettylst cleanup. JEP cleanup reorganized file structure to put hidden feats in separate file as standard Lots of linking cleanup - bad references Outstanding issues: 1 - BONUS:VAR with [PRELEVEL] # What is meant by "(TL+9)/8[PRELEVEL:3]" ? - Tir Gwaith # - (TL+9)/8|PRELEVEL:3 # - (TL+9)/8|!PRELEVEL:3 prettylst lines: data\alpha\bastionpress\faeries\faeries_races.lst (Line 9): Jep syntax error found near "[PRELEVEL:3]" in "BONUS:VAR|RacialTraitsECL|(TL+9)/8[PRELEVEL:3]" (Line 11): Jep syntax error found near "[PRELEVEL:3]" in "BONUS:VAR|RacialTraitsECL|(TL+9)/8[PRELEVEL:3]" (Line 12): Jep syntax error found near "[PRELEVEL:3]" in "BONUS:VAR|RacialTraitsECL|(TL+9)/8[PRELEVEL:3]" (Line 15): Jep syntax error found near "[PRELEVEL:3]" in "BONUS:VAR|RacialTraitsECL|(TL+9)/8[PRELEVEL:3]" 2 - DC / CASTERLEVEL for various SPELLS tags 3 - DEITY tag in class object. I'm not sure about this one, but listed in prettylst. data\alpha\bastionpress\faeries\faeries_classes.lst (Line 6): The tag "DEITY" from "DEITY:None (Faemancer)" is not in the CLASS tag list 4 - Missing Feat "Mite Fighter" Referenced in several PREFEAT: checks. There is an "Improved Mite Fighter" feat (and it needs the original) 5 - Several SPELLS entries I'm not sure what is meant. (Luck, when the spells file lists "Good Luck" and "Bad Luck", that sort of thing) data\alpha\bastionpress\faeries\faeries_feats_hidden.lst (Line 86): No SPELL entry for "SPELLS:Shrink" data\alpha\bastionpress\faeries\faeries_races.lst (Line 9): No SPELL entry for "SPELLS:Luck" (Line 13): No SPELL entry for "SPELLS:Luck" (Line 15): No SPELL entry for "SPELLS:Luck" data\alpha\bastionpress\faeries\faeries_templates_focus.lst (Line 44): No SPELL entry for "SPELLS:Clairaudience" (Line 44): No SPELL entry for "SPELLS:Clairvoyance" (Line 45): No SPELL entry for "SPELLS:Contact Outer Plane" 6 - Reference to a "Metal" domain, when there isn't one in the set or the SRD. data\alpha\bastionpress\faeries\faeries_spells.lst (Line 42): No DOMAIN entry for "DOMAINS:Metal" ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Paul W. King (kingpaul) Date: 2006-10-14 06:39 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=277877 Tir, Steve Creech pointed me to the errata page: http://dragonwing.net/downloads/Faeries_errata.pdf If this doesn't help you out, let me know and I'll get back to him. Paul ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Frank Kliewe (frank_kliewe) Date: 2006-08-31 00:32 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1241568 Setting Priority to 4, since we are waiting for outside input here. -- Frank ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Andrew McDougall (tir-gwaith) Date: 2006-08-25 03:06 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=208239 As mentioned in my comment earlier: - Definition of "Mite Fighter" feat, - Definition for Metal Domain - mentioned in one spell only.. - "Luck" spell is mentioned in several race entries. There is no definition of "Luck" spell, but "Good Luck" and "Bad Luck" - DC / Casterlevel for classes and domains info (if that was designed) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Paul W. King (kingpaul) Date: 2006-08-24 19:22 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=277877 What, exactly, still needs to be asked of Bastion? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Martijn Verburg (karianna) Date: 2006-08-23 10:57 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=252169 Paul, looks like some PL work here... ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Andrew McDougall (tir-gwaith) Date: 2006-03-19 23:49 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=208239 I've adjusted the feats_hidden Fey trait stuff for CASTERLEVEL and DC. Removed #6 - Metal domain reference. Still a bunch of CASTERLEVEL/DC stuff - for classes, mostly. This set is going to need some clarifications, and then some good Data massaging to get all this to work. Committing what I've done so far. David, I'm going to need a PR contact to the publisher for the "Mite Fighter" feat, Domain Metal reference in the single spell, for now. Also need to get ahold of the original entry author and clarify Spell DC/Casterlevel for classes and domains objects. Along with what "Luck" is for SPELLS entry for some races. Both "Good Luck" and "Bad Luck" spells? Send the original author a ZIP of the SVN repos folder for Faeries (Trunk\pcgen\data\alpha\bastionpress\faeries) of Revision 324 or later. That should help him with some of his questions. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Eddy Anthony (eddyanthony) Date: 2005-12-09 04:49 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=886893 Response from Darkon: > 1 - BONUS:VAR with [PRELEVEL] > > # What is meant by "(TL+9)/8[PRELEVEL:3]" ? - Tir Gwaith At third level, a [insert race name here] may pick one ECL point value of Faerie Racial Traits (Including spell-like abilities). Every four levels there thereafter, a [insert race name here] can select an additional half ECL point value of traits or save them to purchase more expensive abilities later. > 2 - DC / CASTERLEVEL for various SPELLS tags These abilities are as the spell cast by a sorceror of the [insert race name here] character level. > 3 - DEITY tag in class object. I'm not sure about this > one, but listed in prettylst. > > data\alpha\bastionpress\faeries\faeries_classes.lst > (Line 6): The tag "DEITY" from "DEITY:None > (Faemancer)" is not in the CLASS tag list Domain (Su): The Faemancer, through experience and luck and the blessings of the FaerieLand, gains access to divine spells. The domain should not be one available to the faemancer from any previous classes, and can be one of the following domains: Air, Animal, Chaos, Dream, Fey, Luck, Magic, Plant, Protection, Travel or Trickery. There spells are retrieved by the fey companions the same as arcane spells are. All faemancer levels count as divine levels when casting these spells. Divine material foci are still required when listed in the spell description, but the spells are otherwise unchanged. New domains asr gained at 3rd, 6th and 9th levels. > 4 - Missing Feat "Mite Fighter" Referenced in several > PREFEAT: checks. There is an "Improved Mite Fighter" > feat (and it needs the original) Apparently the author neglected to add the Mite Fighter feat to the book. Obviously an oversite on his part and mine for not catching something like that. It most likely works like the Improved version but with only a +1 bonus since improved is +2. > 5 - Several SPELLS entries I'm not sure what is meant. > (Luck, when the spells file lists "Good Luck" and "Bad > Luck", that sort of thing) > > data\alpha\bastionpress\faeries\faeries_feats_hidden.lst > (Line 86): No SPELL entry for "SPELLS:Shrink" > data\alpha\bastionpress\faeries\faeries_races.lst > (Line 9): No SPELL entry for "SPELLS:Luck" > (Line 13): No SPELL entry for "SPELLS:Luck" > (Line 15): No SPELL entry for "SPELLS:Luck" > data\alpha\bastionpress\faeries\faeries_templates_focus.lst > (Line 44): No SPELL entry for "SPELLS:Clairaudience" > (Line 44): No SPELL entry for "SPELLS:Clairvoyance" > (Line 45): No SPELL entry for "SPELLS:Contact Outer > Plane" My version of the source no longer has a faeries_feats_hidden.list. Do you know the names of the feats making these references. That way I can look them up and see what their talking about. > 6 - Reference to a "Metal" domain, when there isn't one > in the set or the SRD. > > data\alpha\bastionpress\faeries\faeries_spells.lst > (Line 42): No DOMAIN entry for "DOMAINS:Metal" Only the Fey and Fey Roads domains are introduced in this book but it does make use of the oathbound campaign but I can't find it there either. I would suggest removing the domain entry and wait to see if someone comments on it, then we may find out where that domain was introduced. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Eddy Anthony (eddyanthony) Date: 2005-12-08 15:25 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=886893 I've got no problem with fixing these under one blanket tracker, it all get documented one way or the other. I've sent off an email to Darkon to see if he can clear any of this up. If he can great, If we can't get them all knocked out then we can open separate trackers for the remaining issus. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Andrew McDougall (tir-gwaith) Date: 2005-12-08 10:34 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=208239 File version 1.1 commit comment: [ 1048965 ] Bastion Press - Faeries New souce entered by Darkon Turas When these get fixed, it would be good to add right under the #CVS line - #Original Author: Darkon Turas ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Andrew McDougall (tir-gwaith) Date: 2005-12-08 10:32 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=208239 Section 15 lists "Darkon Turas, Eddy Anthony (MoSaT), Andrew McDougall (Tir Gwaith)." I'd say original author is Darkon Turas, even tho there isn't a comment at the top deliniating it (I can add that at the top if this is the case.) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Martijn Verburg (karianna) Date: 2005-12-08 10:20 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=252169 Hmmm normally I'd say seperate trackers, but we've had several items wrapped up like this recently on the data side, it seems most of the time data monkeys like to fix these in a batch. I'll definitely split it later if need be. Eddy, who was the author of this LST file? - K ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Andrew McDougall (tir-gwaith) Date: 2005-12-08 00:39 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=208239 Kar, Outstanding issues - separate trackers for each one? I don't own the source... Eddy might have a clue on some of these... I leave it in your capable paws. When whatever is done for the outside issues tracker-wise, this one can be closed. I'm committing the major cleanup as soon as I add myself to the COPYRIGHT and OGL.txt sections. - Tir Gwaith ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=750091&aid=1375795&group_id=25576 |
From: SourceForge.net <no...@so...> - 2007-05-20 15:20:54
|
Data Bugs item #1375795, was opened at 2005-12-07 17:35 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by tir-gwaith You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=750091&aid=1375795&group_id=25576 Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the comment thread, including the initial issue submission, for this request, not just the latest update. Category: Missing Source Information >Group: For 5.14 Status: Open Resolution: None >Priority: 6 Private: No Submitted By: Andrew McDougall (tir-gwaith) >Assigned to: Paul W. King (kingpaul) Summary: [Bastion Press] Faeries cleanup Initial Comment: Lots of Prettylst cleanup. JEP cleanup reorganized file structure to put hidden feats in separate file as standard Lots of linking cleanup - bad references Outstanding issues: 1 - BONUS:VAR with [PRELEVEL] # What is meant by "(TL+9)/8[PRELEVEL:3]" ? - Tir Gwaith # - (TL+9)/8|PRELEVEL:3 # - (TL+9)/8|!PRELEVEL:3 prettylst lines: data\alpha\bastionpress\faeries\faeries_races.lst (Line 9): Jep syntax error found near "[PRELEVEL:3]" in "BONUS:VAR|RacialTraitsECL|(TL+9)/8[PRELEVEL:3]" (Line 11): Jep syntax error found near "[PRELEVEL:3]" in "BONUS:VAR|RacialTraitsECL|(TL+9)/8[PRELEVEL:3]" (Line 12): Jep syntax error found near "[PRELEVEL:3]" in "BONUS:VAR|RacialTraitsECL|(TL+9)/8[PRELEVEL:3]" (Line 15): Jep syntax error found near "[PRELEVEL:3]" in "BONUS:VAR|RacialTraitsECL|(TL+9)/8[PRELEVEL:3]" 2 - DC / CASTERLEVEL for various SPELLS tags 3 - DEITY tag in class object. I'm not sure about this one, but listed in prettylst. data\alpha\bastionpress\faeries\faeries_classes.lst (Line 6): The tag "DEITY" from "DEITY:None (Faemancer)" is not in the CLASS tag list 4 - Missing Feat "Mite Fighter" Referenced in several PREFEAT: checks. There is an "Improved Mite Fighter" feat (and it needs the original) 5 - Several SPELLS entries I'm not sure what is meant. (Luck, when the spells file lists "Good Luck" and "Bad Luck", that sort of thing) data\alpha\bastionpress\faeries\faeries_feats_hidden.lst (Line 86): No SPELL entry for "SPELLS:Shrink" data\alpha\bastionpress\faeries\faeries_races.lst (Line 9): No SPELL entry for "SPELLS:Luck" (Line 13): No SPELL entry for "SPELLS:Luck" (Line 15): No SPELL entry for "SPELLS:Luck" data\alpha\bastionpress\faeries\faeries_templates_focus.lst (Line 44): No SPELL entry for "SPELLS:Clairaudience" (Line 44): No SPELL entry for "SPELLS:Clairvoyance" (Line 45): No SPELL entry for "SPELLS:Contact Outer Plane" 6 - Reference to a "Metal" domain, when there isn't one in the set or the SRD. data\alpha\bastionpress\faeries\faeries_spells.lst (Line 42): No DOMAIN entry for "DOMAINS:Metal" ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Andrew McDougall (tir-gwaith) Date: 2007-05-20 10:20 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=208239 Originator: YES Errata makes me feel this set needs even more work. NOT MENTIONED - Definition of "Mite Fighter" feat, NOT MENTIONED (in a previous source?) - Definition for Metal Domain - mentioned in one spell only.. NOT MENTIONED, but the like to leave a lot to 'DM' - "Luck" spell is mentioned in several race entries. There is no definition of "Luck" spell, but "Good Luck" and "Bad Luck" NOT MENTIONED - DC / Casterlevel for classes and domains info (if that was designed) Of NOTE: Q: Why does the feat “Insight of the Fey” require a base Will save +3 at 1st level? A: This should be a base Will save of +2 at 1st level. - Current dataset has 'Insight of the Fey' with the exact same requirements as Improved Mite Fighter (line above it). Mistake in the PREreqs, possibly extending beyond this feat (is more than one feat PRExxx off by one line?) Since this still requires further clarification, I'm downgrading Priority to past 5.12. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Paul W. King (kingpaul) Date: 2006-10-13 23:39 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=277877 Tir, Steve Creech pointed me to the errata page: http://dragonwing.net/downloads/Faeries_errata.pdf If this doesn't help you out, let me know and I'll get back to him. Paul ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Frank Kliewe (frank_kliewe) Date: 2006-08-30 17:32 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1241568 Setting Priority to 4, since we are waiting for outside input here. -- Frank ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Andrew McDougall (tir-gwaith) Date: 2006-08-24 20:06 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=208239 As mentioned in my comment earlier: - Definition of "Mite Fighter" feat, - Definition for Metal Domain - mentioned in one spell only.. - "Luck" spell is mentioned in several race entries. There is no definition of "Luck" spell, but "Good Luck" and "Bad Luck" - DC / Casterlevel for classes and domains info (if that was designed) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Paul W. King (kingpaul) Date: 2006-08-24 12:22 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=277877 What, exactly, still needs to be asked of Bastion? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Martijn Verburg (karianna) Date: 2006-08-23 03:57 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=252169 Paul, looks like some PL work here... ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Andrew McDougall (tir-gwaith) Date: 2006-03-19 16:49 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=208239 I've adjusted the feats_hidden Fey trait stuff for CASTERLEVEL and DC. Removed #6 - Metal domain reference. Still a bunch of CASTERLEVEL/DC stuff - for classes, mostly. This set is going to need some clarifications, and then some good Data massaging to get all this to work. Committing what I've done so far. David, I'm going to need a PR contact to the publisher for the "Mite Fighter" feat, Domain Metal reference in the single spell, for now. Also need to get ahold of the original entry author and clarify Spell DC/Casterlevel for classes and domains objects. Along with what "Luck" is for SPELLS entry for some races. Both "Good Luck" and "Bad Luck" spells? Send the original author a ZIP of the SVN repos folder for Faeries (Trunk\pcgen\data\alpha\bastionpress\faeries) of Revision 324 or later. That should help him with some of his questions. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Eddy Anthony (eddyanthony) Date: 2005-12-08 21:49 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=886893 Response from Darkon: > 1 - BONUS:VAR with [PRELEVEL] > > # What is meant by "(TL+9)/8[PRELEVEL:3]" ? - Tir Gwaith At third level, a [insert race name here] may pick one ECL point value of Faerie Racial Traits (Including spell-like abilities). Every four levels there thereafter, a [insert race name here] can select an additional half ECL point value of traits or save them to purchase more expensive abilities later. > 2 - DC / CASTERLEVEL for various SPELLS tags These abilities are as the spell cast by a sorceror of the [insert race name here] character level. > 3 - DEITY tag in class object. I'm not sure about this > one, but listed in prettylst. > > data\alpha\bastionpress\faeries\faeries_classes.lst > (Line 6): The tag "DEITY" from "DEITY:None > (Faemancer)" is not in the CLASS tag list Domain (Su): The Faemancer, through experience and luck and the blessings of the FaerieLand, gains access to divine spells. The domain should not be one available to the faemancer from any previous classes, and can be one of the following domains: Air, Animal, Chaos, Dream, Fey, Luck, Magic, Plant, Protection, Travel or Trickery. There spells are retrieved by the fey companions the same as arcane spells are. All faemancer levels count as divine levels when casting these spells. Divine material foci are still required when listed in the spell description, but the spells are otherwise unchanged. New domains asr gained at 3rd, 6th and 9th levels. > 4 - Missing Feat "Mite Fighter" Referenced in several > PREFEAT: checks. There is an "Improved Mite Fighter" > feat (and it needs the original) Apparently the author neglected to add the Mite Fighter feat to the book. Obviously an oversite on his part and mine for not catching something like that. It most likely works like the Improved version but with only a +1 bonus since improved is +2. > 5 - Several SPELLS entries I'm not sure what is meant. > (Luck, when the spells file lists "Good Luck" and "Bad > Luck", that sort of thing) > > data\alpha\bastionpress\faeries\faeries_feats_hidden.lst > (Line 86): No SPELL entry for "SPELLS:Shrink" > data\alpha\bastionpress\faeries\faeries_races.lst > (Line 9): No SPELL entry for "SPELLS:Luck" > (Line 13): No SPELL entry for "SPELLS:Luck" > (Line 15): No SPELL entry for "SPELLS:Luck" > data\alpha\bastionpress\faeries\faeries_templates_focus.lst > (Line 44): No SPELL entry for "SPELLS:Clairaudience" > (Line 44): No SPELL entry for "SPELLS:Clairvoyance" > (Line 45): No SPELL entry for "SPELLS:Contact Outer > Plane" My version of the source no longer has a faeries_feats_hidden.list. Do you know the names of the feats making these references. That way I can look them up and see what their talking about. > 6 - Reference to a "Metal" domain, when there isn't one > in the set or the SRD. > > data\alpha\bastionpress\faeries\faeries_spells.lst > (Line 42): No DOMAIN entry for "DOMAINS:Metal" Only the Fey and Fey Roads domains are introduced in this book but it does make use of the oathbound campaign but I can't find it there either. I would suggest removing the domain entry and wait to see if someone comments on it, then we may find out where that domain was introduced. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Eddy Anthony (eddyanthony) Date: 2005-12-08 08:25 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=886893 I've got no problem with fixing these under one blanket tracker, it all get documented one way or the other. I've sent off an email to Darkon to see if he can clear any of this up. If he can great, If we can't get them all knocked out then we can open separate trackers for the remaining issus. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Andrew McDougall (tir-gwaith) Date: 2005-12-08 03:34 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=208239 File version 1.1 commit comment: [ 1048965 ] Bastion Press - Faeries New souce entered by Darkon Turas When these get fixed, it would be good to add right under the #CVS line - #Original Author: Darkon Turas ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Andrew McDougall (tir-gwaith) Date: 2005-12-08 03:32 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=208239 Section 15 lists "Darkon Turas, Eddy Anthony (MoSaT), Andrew McDougall (Tir Gwaith)." I'd say original author is Darkon Turas, even tho there isn't a comment at the top deliniating it (I can add that at the top if this is the case.) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Martijn Verburg (karianna) Date: 2005-12-08 03:20 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=252169 Hmmm normally I'd say seperate trackers, but we've had several items wrapped up like this recently on the data side, it seems most of the time data monkeys like to fix these in a batch. I'll definitely split it later if need be. Eddy, who was the author of this LST file? - K ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Andrew McDougall (tir-gwaith) Date: 2005-12-07 17:39 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=208239 Kar, Outstanding issues - separate trackers for each one? I don't own the source... Eddy might have a clue on some of these... I leave it in your capable paws. When whatever is done for the outside issues tracker-wise, this one can be closed. I'm committing the major cleanup as soon as I add myself to the COPYRIGHT and OGL.txt sections. - Tir Gwaith ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=750091&aid=1375795&group_id=25576 |
From: SourceForge.net <no...@so...> - 2007-05-20 15:21:14
|
Data Bugs item #1375795, was opened at 2005-12-07 17:35 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by tir-gwaith You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=750091&aid=1375795&group_id=25576 Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the comment thread, including the initial issue submission, for this request, not just the latest update. Category: Missing Source Information Group: For 5.14 Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 6 Private: No Submitted By: Andrew McDougall (tir-gwaith) Assigned to: Paul W. King (kingpaul) Summary: [Bastion Press] Faeries cleanup Initial Comment: Lots of Prettylst cleanup. JEP cleanup reorganized file structure to put hidden feats in separate file as standard Lots of linking cleanup - bad references Outstanding issues: 1 - BONUS:VAR with [PRELEVEL] # What is meant by "(TL+9)/8[PRELEVEL:3]" ? - Tir Gwaith # - (TL+9)/8|PRELEVEL:3 # - (TL+9)/8|!PRELEVEL:3 prettylst lines: data\alpha\bastionpress\faeries\faeries_races.lst (Line 9): Jep syntax error found near "[PRELEVEL:3]" in "BONUS:VAR|RacialTraitsECL|(TL+9)/8[PRELEVEL:3]" (Line 11): Jep syntax error found near "[PRELEVEL:3]" in "BONUS:VAR|RacialTraitsECL|(TL+9)/8[PRELEVEL:3]" (Line 12): Jep syntax error found near "[PRELEVEL:3]" in "BONUS:VAR|RacialTraitsECL|(TL+9)/8[PRELEVEL:3]" (Line 15): Jep syntax error found near "[PRELEVEL:3]" in "BONUS:VAR|RacialTraitsECL|(TL+9)/8[PRELEVEL:3]" 2 - DC / CASTERLEVEL for various SPELLS tags 3 - DEITY tag in class object. I'm not sure about this one, but listed in prettylst. data\alpha\bastionpress\faeries\faeries_classes.lst (Line 6): The tag "DEITY" from "DEITY:None (Faemancer)" is not in the CLASS tag list 4 - Missing Feat "Mite Fighter" Referenced in several PREFEAT: checks. There is an "Improved Mite Fighter" feat (and it needs the original) 5 - Several SPELLS entries I'm not sure what is meant. (Luck, when the spells file lists "Good Luck" and "Bad Luck", that sort of thing) data\alpha\bastionpress\faeries\faeries_feats_hidden.lst (Line 86): No SPELL entry for "SPELLS:Shrink" data\alpha\bastionpress\faeries\faeries_races.lst (Line 9): No SPELL entry for "SPELLS:Luck" (Line 13): No SPELL entry for "SPELLS:Luck" (Line 15): No SPELL entry for "SPELLS:Luck" data\alpha\bastionpress\faeries\faeries_templates_focus.lst (Line 44): No SPELL entry for "SPELLS:Clairaudience" (Line 44): No SPELL entry for "SPELLS:Clairvoyance" (Line 45): No SPELL entry for "SPELLS:Contact Outer Plane" 6 - Reference to a "Metal" domain, when there isn't one in the set or the SRD. data\alpha\bastionpress\faeries\faeries_spells.lst (Line 42): No DOMAIN entry for "DOMAINS:Metal" ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Andrew McDougall (tir-gwaith) Date: 2007-05-20 10:21 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=208239 Originator: YES Errata makes me feel this set needs even more work. NOT MENTIONED - Definition of "Mite Fighter" feat, NOT MENTIONED (in a previous source?) - Definition for Metal Domain - mentioned in one spell only.. NOT MENTIONED, but the like to leave a lot to 'DM' - "Luck" spell is mentioned in several race entries. There is no definition of "Luck" spell, but "Good Luck" and "Bad Luck" NOT MENTIONED - DC / Casterlevel for classes and domains info (if that was designed) Of NOTE: Q: Why does the feat “Insight of the Fey” require a base Will save +3 at 1st level? A: This should be a base Will save of +2 at 1st level. - Current dataset has 'Insight of the Fey' with the exact same requirements as Improved Mite Fighter (line above it). Mistake in the PREreqs, possibly extending beyond this feat (is more than one feat PRExxx off by one line?) Since this still requires further clarification, I'm downgrading Priority to past 5.12. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Andrew McDougall (tir-gwaith) Date: 2007-05-20 10:20 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=208239 Originator: YES Errata makes me feel this set needs even more work. NOT MENTIONED - Definition of "Mite Fighter" feat, NOT MENTIONED (in a previous source?) - Definition for Metal Domain - mentioned in one spell only.. NOT MENTIONED, but the like to leave a lot to 'DM' - "Luck" spell is mentioned in several race entries. There is no definition of "Luck" spell, but "Good Luck" and "Bad Luck" NOT MENTIONED - DC / Casterlevel for classes and domains info (if that was designed) Of NOTE: Q: Why does the feat “Insight of the Fey” require a base Will save +3 at 1st level? A: This should be a base Will save of +2 at 1st level. - Current dataset has 'Insight of the Fey' with the exact same requirements as Improved Mite Fighter (line above it). Mistake in the PREreqs, possibly extending beyond this feat (is more than one feat PRExxx off by one line?) Since this still requires further clarification, I'm downgrading Priority to past 5.12. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Paul W. King (kingpaul) Date: 2006-10-13 23:39 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=277877 Tir, Steve Creech pointed me to the errata page: http://dragonwing.net/downloads/Faeries_errata.pdf If this doesn't help you out, let me know and I'll get back to him. Paul ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Frank Kliewe (frank_kliewe) Date: 2006-08-30 17:32 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1241568 Setting Priority to 4, since we are waiting for outside input here. -- Frank ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Andrew McDougall (tir-gwaith) Date: 2006-08-24 20:06 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=208239 As mentioned in my comment earlier: - Definition of "Mite Fighter" feat, - Definition for Metal Domain - mentioned in one spell only.. - "Luck" spell is mentioned in several race entries. There is no definition of "Luck" spell, but "Good Luck" and "Bad Luck" - DC / Casterlevel for classes and domains info (if that was designed) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Paul W. King (kingpaul) Date: 2006-08-24 12:22 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=277877 What, exactly, still needs to be asked of Bastion? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Martijn Verburg (karianna) Date: 2006-08-23 03:57 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=252169 Paul, looks like some PL work here... ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Andrew McDougall (tir-gwaith) Date: 2006-03-19 16:49 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=208239 I've adjusted the feats_hidden Fey trait stuff for CASTERLEVEL and DC. Removed #6 - Metal domain reference. Still a bunch of CASTERLEVEL/DC stuff - for classes, mostly. This set is going to need some clarifications, and then some good Data massaging to get all this to work. Committing what I've done so far. David, I'm going to need a PR contact to the publisher for the "Mite Fighter" feat, Domain Metal reference in the single spell, for now. Also need to get ahold of the original entry author and clarify Spell DC/Casterlevel for classes and domains objects. Along with what "Luck" is for SPELLS entry for some races. Both "Good Luck" and "Bad Luck" spells? Send the original author a ZIP of the SVN repos folder for Faeries (Trunk\pcgen\data\alpha\bastionpress\faeries) of Revision 324 or later. That should help him with some of his questions. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Eddy Anthony (eddyanthony) Date: 2005-12-08 21:49 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=886893 Response from Darkon: > 1 - BONUS:VAR with [PRELEVEL] > > # What is meant by "(TL+9)/8[PRELEVEL:3]" ? - Tir Gwaith At third level, a [insert race name here] may pick one ECL point value of Faerie Racial Traits (Including spell-like abilities). Every four levels there thereafter, a [insert race name here] can select an additional half ECL point value of traits or save them to purchase more expensive abilities later. > 2 - DC / CASTERLEVEL for various SPELLS tags These abilities are as the spell cast by a sorceror of the [insert race name here] character level. > 3 - DEITY tag in class object. I'm not sure about this > one, but listed in prettylst. > > data\alpha\bastionpress\faeries\faeries_classes.lst > (Line 6): The tag "DEITY" from "DEITY:None > (Faemancer)" is not in the CLASS tag list Domain (Su): The Faemancer, through experience and luck and the blessings of the FaerieLand, gains access to divine spells. The domain should not be one available to the faemancer from any previous classes, and can be one of the following domains: Air, Animal, Chaos, Dream, Fey, Luck, Magic, Plant, Protection, Travel or Trickery. There spells are retrieved by the fey companions the same as arcane spells are. All faemancer levels count as divine levels when casting these spells. Divine material foci are still required when listed in the spell description, but the spells are otherwise unchanged. New domains asr gained at 3rd, 6th and 9th levels. > 4 - Missing Feat "Mite Fighter" Referenced in several > PREFEAT: checks. There is an "Improved Mite Fighter" > feat (and it needs the original) Apparently the author neglected to add the Mite Fighter feat to the book. Obviously an oversite on his part and mine for not catching something like that. It most likely works like the Improved version but with only a +1 bonus since improved is +2. > 5 - Several SPELLS entries I'm not sure what is meant. > (Luck, when the spells file lists "Good Luck" and "Bad > Luck", that sort of thing) > > data\alpha\bastionpress\faeries\faeries_feats_hidden.lst > (Line 86): No SPELL entry for "SPELLS:Shrink" > data\alpha\bastionpress\faeries\faeries_races.lst > (Line 9): No SPELL entry for "SPELLS:Luck" > (Line 13): No SPELL entry for "SPELLS:Luck" > (Line 15): No SPELL entry for "SPELLS:Luck" > data\alpha\bastionpress\faeries\faeries_templates_focus.lst > (Line 44): No SPELL entry for "SPELLS:Clairaudience" > (Line 44): No SPELL entry for "SPELLS:Clairvoyance" > (Line 45): No SPELL entry for "SPELLS:Contact Outer > Plane" My version of the source no longer has a faeries_feats_hidden.list. Do you know the names of the feats making these references. That way I can look them up and see what their talking about. > 6 - Reference to a "Metal" domain, when there isn't one > in the set or the SRD. > > data\alpha\bastionpress\faeries\faeries_spells.lst > (Line 42): No DOMAIN entry for "DOMAINS:Metal" Only the Fey and Fey Roads domains are introduced in this book but it does make use of the oathbound campaign but I can't find it there either. I would suggest removing the domain entry and wait to see if someone comments on it, then we may find out where that domain was introduced. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Eddy Anthony (eddyanthony) Date: 2005-12-08 08:25 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=886893 I've got no problem with fixing these under one blanket tracker, it all get documented one way or the other. I've sent off an email to Darkon to see if he can clear any of this up. If he can great, If we can't get them all knocked out then we can open separate trackers for the remaining issus. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Andrew McDougall (tir-gwaith) Date: 2005-12-08 03:34 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=208239 File version 1.1 commit comment: [ 1048965 ] Bastion Press - Faeries New souce entered by Darkon Turas When these get fixed, it would be good to add right under the #CVS line - #Original Author: Darkon Turas ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Andrew McDougall (tir-gwaith) Date: 2005-12-08 03:32 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=208239 Section 15 lists "Darkon Turas, Eddy Anthony (MoSaT), Andrew McDougall (Tir Gwaith)." I'd say original author is Darkon Turas, even tho there isn't a comment at the top deliniating it (I can add that at the top if this is the case.) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Martijn Verburg (karianna) Date: 2005-12-08 03:20 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=252169 Hmmm normally I'd say seperate trackers, but we've had several items wrapped up like this recently on the data side, it seems most of the time data monkeys like to fix these in a batch. I'll definitely split it later if need be. Eddy, who was the author of this LST file? - K ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Andrew McDougall (tir-gwaith) Date: 2005-12-07 17:39 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=208239 Kar, Outstanding issues - separate trackers for each one? I don't own the source... Eddy might have a clue on some of these... I leave it in your capable paws. When whatever is done for the outside issues tracker-wise, this one can be closed. I'm committing the major cleanup as soon as I add myself to the COPYRIGHT and OGL.txt sections. - Tir Gwaith ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=750091&aid=1375795&group_id=25576 |
From: SourceForge.net <no...@so...> - 2007-06-24 04:42:57
|
Data Bugs item #1375795, was opened at 2005-12-07 18:35 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by kingpaul You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=750091&aid=1375795&group_id=25576 Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the comment thread, including the initial issue submission, for this request, not just the latest update. Category: Missing Source Information Group: For 5.14 Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 6 Private: No Submitted By: Andrew McDougall (tir-gwaith) Assigned to: Paul W. King (kingpaul) Summary: [Bastion Press] Faeries cleanup Initial Comment: Lots of Prettylst cleanup. JEP cleanup reorganized file structure to put hidden feats in separate file as standard Lots of linking cleanup - bad references Outstanding issues: 1 - BONUS:VAR with [PRELEVEL] # What is meant by "(TL+9)/8[PRELEVEL:3]" ? - Tir Gwaith # - (TL+9)/8|PRELEVEL:3 # - (TL+9)/8|!PRELEVEL:3 prettylst lines: data\alpha\bastionpress\faeries\faeries_races.lst (Line 9): Jep syntax error found near "[PRELEVEL:3]" in "BONUS:VAR|RacialTraitsECL|(TL+9)/8[PRELEVEL:3]" (Line 11): Jep syntax error found near "[PRELEVEL:3]" in "BONUS:VAR|RacialTraitsECL|(TL+9)/8[PRELEVEL:3]" (Line 12): Jep syntax error found near "[PRELEVEL:3]" in "BONUS:VAR|RacialTraitsECL|(TL+9)/8[PRELEVEL:3]" (Line 15): Jep syntax error found near "[PRELEVEL:3]" in "BONUS:VAR|RacialTraitsECL|(TL+9)/8[PRELEVEL:3]" 2 - DC / CASTERLEVEL for various SPELLS tags 3 - DEITY tag in class object. I'm not sure about this one, but listed in prettylst. data\alpha\bastionpress\faeries\faeries_classes.lst (Line 6): The tag "DEITY" from "DEITY:None (Faemancer)" is not in the CLASS tag list 4 - Missing Feat "Mite Fighter" Referenced in several PREFEAT: checks. There is an "Improved Mite Fighter" feat (and it needs the original) 5 - Several SPELLS entries I'm not sure what is meant. (Luck, when the spells file lists "Good Luck" and "Bad Luck", that sort of thing) data\alpha\bastionpress\faeries\faeries_feats_hidden.lst (Line 86): No SPELL entry for "SPELLS:Shrink" data\alpha\bastionpress\faeries\faeries_races.lst (Line 9): No SPELL entry for "SPELLS:Luck" (Line 13): No SPELL entry for "SPELLS:Luck" (Line 15): No SPELL entry for "SPELLS:Luck" data\alpha\bastionpress\faeries\faeries_templates_focus.lst (Line 44): No SPELL entry for "SPELLS:Clairaudience" (Line 44): No SPELL entry for "SPELLS:Clairvoyance" (Line 45): No SPELL entry for "SPELLS:Contact Outer Plane" 6 - Reference to a "Metal" domain, when there isn't one in the set or the SRD. data\alpha\bastionpress\faeries\faeries_spells.lst (Line 42): No DOMAIN entry for "DOMAINS:Metal" ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Paul W. King (kingpaul) Date: 2007-06-24 00:42 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=277877 Originator: NO Tir, I've sent an email off to Steve about your questions. I know longer get emails from SF on tracker updates, so its a bit difficult for me to follow them anymore. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Andrew McDougall (tir-gwaith) Date: 2007-05-20 11:21 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=208239 Originator: YES Errata makes me feel this set needs even more work. NOT MENTIONED - Definition of "Mite Fighter" feat, NOT MENTIONED (in a previous source?) - Definition for Metal Domain - mentioned in one spell only.. NOT MENTIONED, but the like to leave a lot to 'DM' - "Luck" spell is mentioned in several race entries. There is no definition of "Luck" spell, but "Good Luck" and "Bad Luck" NOT MENTIONED - DC / Casterlevel for classes and domains info (if that was designed) Of NOTE: Q: Why does the feat “Insight of the Fey” require a base Will save +3 at 1st level? A: This should be a base Will save of +2 at 1st level. - Current dataset has 'Insight of the Fey' with the exact same requirements as Improved Mite Fighter (line above it). Mistake in the PREreqs, possibly extending beyond this feat (is more than one feat PRExxx off by one line?) Since this still requires further clarification, I'm downgrading Priority to past 5.12. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Andrew McDougall (tir-gwaith) Date: 2007-05-20 11:20 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=208239 Originator: YES Errata makes me feel this set needs even more work. NOT MENTIONED - Definition of "Mite Fighter" feat, NOT MENTIONED (in a previous source?) - Definition for Metal Domain - mentioned in one spell only.. NOT MENTIONED, but the like to leave a lot to 'DM' - "Luck" spell is mentioned in several race entries. There is no definition of "Luck" spell, but "Good Luck" and "Bad Luck" NOT MENTIONED - DC / Casterlevel for classes and domains info (if that was designed) Of NOTE: Q: Why does the feat “Insight of the Fey” require a base Will save +3 at 1st level? A: This should be a base Will save of +2 at 1st level. - Current dataset has 'Insight of the Fey' with the exact same requirements as Improved Mite Fighter (line above it). Mistake in the PREreqs, possibly extending beyond this feat (is more than one feat PRExxx off by one line?) Since this still requires further clarification, I'm downgrading Priority to past 5.12. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Paul W. King (kingpaul) Date: 2006-10-14 00:39 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=277877 Tir, Steve Creech pointed me to the errata page: http://dragonwing.net/downloads/Faeries_errata.pdf If this doesn't help you out, let me know and I'll get back to him. Paul ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Frank Kliewe (frank_kliewe) Date: 2006-08-30 18:32 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1241568 Setting Priority to 4, since we are waiting for outside input here. -- Frank ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Andrew McDougall (tir-gwaith) Date: 2006-08-24 21:06 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=208239 As mentioned in my comment earlier: - Definition of "Mite Fighter" feat, - Definition for Metal Domain - mentioned in one spell only.. - "Luck" spell is mentioned in several race entries. There is no definition of "Luck" spell, but "Good Luck" and "Bad Luck" - DC / Casterlevel for classes and domains info (if that was designed) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Paul W. King (kingpaul) Date: 2006-08-24 13:22 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=277877 What, exactly, still needs to be asked of Bastion? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Martijn Verburg (karianna) Date: 2006-08-23 04:57 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=252169 Paul, looks like some PL work here... ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Andrew McDougall (tir-gwaith) Date: 2006-03-19 17:49 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=208239 I've adjusted the feats_hidden Fey trait stuff for CASTERLEVEL and DC. Removed #6 - Metal domain reference. Still a bunch of CASTERLEVEL/DC stuff - for classes, mostly. This set is going to need some clarifications, and then some good Data massaging to get all this to work. Committing what I've done so far. David, I'm going to need a PR contact to the publisher for the "Mite Fighter" feat, Domain Metal reference in the single spell, for now. Also need to get ahold of the original entry author and clarify Spell DC/Casterlevel for classes and domains objects. Along with what "Luck" is for SPELLS entry for some races. Both "Good Luck" and "Bad Luck" spells? Send the original author a ZIP of the SVN repos folder for Faeries (Trunk\pcgen\data\alpha\bastionpress\faeries) of Revision 324 or later. That should help him with some of his questions. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Eddy Anthony (eddyanthony) Date: 2005-12-08 22:49 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=886893 Response from Darkon: > 1 - BONUS:VAR with [PRELEVEL] > > # What is meant by "(TL+9)/8[PRELEVEL:3]" ? - Tir Gwaith At third level, a [insert race name here] may pick one ECL point value of Faerie Racial Traits (Including spell-like abilities). Every four levels there thereafter, a [insert race name here] can select an additional half ECL point value of traits or save them to purchase more expensive abilities later. > 2 - DC / CASTERLEVEL for various SPELLS tags These abilities are as the spell cast by a sorceror of the [insert race name here] character level. > 3 - DEITY tag in class object. I'm not sure about this > one, but listed in prettylst. > > data\alpha\bastionpress\faeries\faeries_classes.lst > (Line 6): The tag "DEITY" from "DEITY:None > (Faemancer)" is not in the CLASS tag list Domain (Su): The Faemancer, through experience and luck and the blessings of the FaerieLand, gains access to divine spells. The domain should not be one available to the faemancer from any previous classes, and can be one of the following domains: Air, Animal, Chaos, Dream, Fey, Luck, Magic, Plant, Protection, Travel or Trickery. There spells are retrieved by the fey companions the same as arcane spells are. All faemancer levels count as divine levels when casting these spells. Divine material foci are still required when listed in the spell description, but the spells are otherwise unchanged. New domains asr gained at 3rd, 6th and 9th levels. > 4 - Missing Feat "Mite Fighter" Referenced in several > PREFEAT: checks. There is an "Improved Mite Fighter" > feat (and it needs the original) Apparently the author neglected to add the Mite Fighter feat to the book. Obviously an oversite on his part and mine for not catching something like that. It most likely works like the Improved version but with only a +1 bonus since improved is +2. > 5 - Several SPELLS entries I'm not sure what is meant. > (Luck, when the spells file lists "Good Luck" and "Bad > Luck", that sort of thing) > > data\alpha\bastionpress\faeries\faeries_feats_hidden.lst > (Line 86): No SPELL entry for "SPELLS:Shrink" > data\alpha\bastionpress\faeries\faeries_races.lst > (Line 9): No SPELL entry for "SPELLS:Luck" > (Line 13): No SPELL entry for "SPELLS:Luck" > (Line 15): No SPELL entry for "SPELLS:Luck" > data\alpha\bastionpress\faeries\faeries_templates_focus.lst > (Line 44): No SPELL entry for "SPELLS:Clairaudience" > (Line 44): No SPELL entry for "SPELLS:Clairvoyance" > (Line 45): No SPELL entry for "SPELLS:Contact Outer > Plane" My version of the source no longer has a faeries_feats_hidden.list. Do you know the names of the feats making these references. That way I can look them up and see what their talking about. > 6 - Reference to a "Metal" domain, when there isn't one > in the set or the SRD. > > data\alpha\bastionpress\faeries\faeries_spells.lst > (Line 42): No DOMAIN entry for "DOMAINS:Metal" Only the Fey and Fey Roads domains are introduced in this book but it does make use of the oathbound campaign but I can't find it there either. I would suggest removing the domain entry and wait to see if someone comments on it, then we may find out where that domain was introduced. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Eddy Anthony (eddyanthony) Date: 2005-12-08 09:25 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=886893 I've got no problem with fixing these under one blanket tracker, it all get documented one way or the other. I've sent off an email to Darkon to see if he can clear any of this up. If he can great, If we can't get them all knocked out then we can open separate trackers for the remaining issus. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Andrew McDougall (tir-gwaith) Date: 2005-12-08 04:34 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=208239 File version 1.1 commit comment: [ 1048965 ] Bastion Press - Faeries New souce entered by Darkon Turas When these get fixed, it would be good to add right under the #CVS line - #Original Author: Darkon Turas ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Andrew McDougall (tir-gwaith) Date: 2005-12-08 04:32 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=208239 Section 15 lists "Darkon Turas, Eddy Anthony (MoSaT), Andrew McDougall (Tir Gwaith)." I'd say original author is Darkon Turas, even tho there isn't a comment at the top deliniating it (I can add that at the top if this is the case.) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Martijn Verburg (karianna) Date: 2005-12-08 04:20 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=252169 Hmmm normally I'd say seperate trackers, but we've had several items wrapped up like this recently on the data side, it seems most of the time data monkeys like to fix these in a batch. I'll definitely split it later if need be. Eddy, who was the author of this LST file? - K ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Andrew McDougall (tir-gwaith) Date: 2005-12-07 18:39 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=208239 Kar, Outstanding issues - separate trackers for each one? I don't own the source... Eddy might have a clue on some of these... I leave it in your capable paws. When whatever is done for the outside issues tracker-wise, this one can be closed. I'm committing the major cleanup as soon as I add myself to the COPYRIGHT and OGL.txt sections. - Tir Gwaith ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=750091&aid=1375795&group_id=25576 |
From: SourceForge.net <no...@so...> - 2007-11-21 08:36:58
|
Data Bugs item #1375795, was opened at 2005-12-07 15:35 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by amaitland You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=750091&aid=1375795&group_id=25576 Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the comment thread, including the initial issue submission, for this request, not just the latest update. Category: Missing Source Information Group: For 5.14 Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 6 Private: No Submitted By: Andrew McDougall (tir-gwaith) >Assigned to: Maredudd (maredudd800) Summary: [Bastion Press] Faeries cleanup Initial Comment: Lots of Prettylst cleanup. JEP cleanup reorganized file structure to put hidden feats in separate file as standard Lots of linking cleanup - bad references Outstanding issues: 1 - BONUS:VAR with [PRELEVEL] # What is meant by "(TL+9)/8[PRELEVEL:3]" ? - Tir Gwaith # - (TL+9)/8|PRELEVEL:3 # - (TL+9)/8|!PRELEVEL:3 prettylst lines: data\alpha\bastionpress\faeries\faeries_races.lst (Line 9): Jep syntax error found near "[PRELEVEL:3]" in "BONUS:VAR|RacialTraitsECL|(TL+9)/8[PRELEVEL:3]" (Line 11): Jep syntax error found near "[PRELEVEL:3]" in "BONUS:VAR|RacialTraitsECL|(TL+9)/8[PRELEVEL:3]" (Line 12): Jep syntax error found near "[PRELEVEL:3]" in "BONUS:VAR|RacialTraitsECL|(TL+9)/8[PRELEVEL:3]" (Line 15): Jep syntax error found near "[PRELEVEL:3]" in "BONUS:VAR|RacialTraitsECL|(TL+9)/8[PRELEVEL:3]" 2 - DC / CASTERLEVEL for various SPELLS tags 3 - DEITY tag in class object. I'm not sure about this one, but listed in prettylst. data\alpha\bastionpress\faeries\faeries_classes.lst (Line 6): The tag "DEITY" from "DEITY:None (Faemancer)" is not in the CLASS tag list 4 - Missing Feat "Mite Fighter" Referenced in several PREFEAT: checks. There is an "Improved Mite Fighter" feat (and it needs the original) 5 - Several SPELLS entries I'm not sure what is meant. (Luck, when the spells file lists "Good Luck" and "Bad Luck", that sort of thing) data\alpha\bastionpress\faeries\faeries_feats_hidden.lst (Line 86): No SPELL entry for "SPELLS:Shrink" data\alpha\bastionpress\faeries\faeries_races.lst (Line 9): No SPELL entry for "SPELLS:Luck" (Line 13): No SPELL entry for "SPELLS:Luck" (Line 15): No SPELL entry for "SPELLS:Luck" data\alpha\bastionpress\faeries\faeries_templates_focus.lst (Line 44): No SPELL entry for "SPELLS:Clairaudience" (Line 44): No SPELL entry for "SPELLS:Clairvoyance" (Line 45): No SPELL entry for "SPELLS:Contact Outer Plane" 6 - Reference to a "Metal" domain, when there isn't one in the set or the SRD. data\alpha\bastionpress\faeries\faeries_spells.lst (Line 42): No DOMAIN entry for "DOMAINS:Metal" ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: LegacyKing (amaitland) Date: 2007-11-21 00:37 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1286039 Originator: NO Requested Eric see what he can do on the PL side... Reassigning the Tracker to him for now. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Paul W. King (kingpaul) Date: 2007-06-23 21:42 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=277877 Originator: NO Tir, I've sent an email off to Steve about your questions. I know longer get emails from SF on tracker updates, so its a bit difficult for me to follow them anymore. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Andrew McDougall (tir-gwaith) Date: 2007-05-20 08:21 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=208239 Originator: YES Errata makes me feel this set needs even more work. NOT MENTIONED - Definition of "Mite Fighter" feat, NOT MENTIONED (in a previous source?) - Definition for Metal Domain - mentioned in one spell only.. NOT MENTIONED, but the like to leave a lot to 'DM' - "Luck" spell is mentioned in several race entries. There is no definition of "Luck" spell, but "Good Luck" and "Bad Luck" NOT MENTIONED - DC / Casterlevel for classes and domains info (if that was designed) Of NOTE: Q: Why does the feat “Insight of the Fey” require a base Will save +3 at 1st level? A: This should be a base Will save of +2 at 1st level. - Current dataset has 'Insight of the Fey' with the exact same requirements as Improved Mite Fighter (line above it). Mistake in the PREreqs, possibly extending beyond this feat (is more than one feat PRExxx off by one line?) Since this still requires further clarification, I'm downgrading Priority to past 5.12. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Andrew McDougall (tir-gwaith) Date: 2007-05-20 08:20 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=208239 Originator: YES Errata makes me feel this set needs even more work. NOT MENTIONED - Definition of "Mite Fighter" feat, NOT MENTIONED (in a previous source?) - Definition for Metal Domain - mentioned in one spell only.. NOT MENTIONED, but the like to leave a lot to 'DM' - "Luck" spell is mentioned in several race entries. There is no definition of "Luck" spell, but "Good Luck" and "Bad Luck" NOT MENTIONED - DC / Casterlevel for classes and domains info (if that was designed) Of NOTE: Q: Why does the feat “Insight of the Fey” require a base Will save +3 at 1st level? A: This should be a base Will save of +2 at 1st level. - Current dataset has 'Insight of the Fey' with the exact same requirements as Improved Mite Fighter (line above it). Mistake in the PREreqs, possibly extending beyond this feat (is more than one feat PRExxx off by one line?) Since this still requires further clarification, I'm downgrading Priority to past 5.12. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Paul W. King (kingpaul) Date: 2006-10-13 21:39 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=277877 Tir, Steve Creech pointed me to the errata page: http://dragonwing.net/downloads/Faeries_errata.pdf If this doesn't help you out, let me know and I'll get back to him. Paul ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Frank Kliewe (frank_kliewe) Date: 2006-08-30 15:32 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1241568 Setting Priority to 4, since we are waiting for outside input here. -- Frank ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Andrew McDougall (tir-gwaith) Date: 2006-08-24 18:06 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=208239 As mentioned in my comment earlier: - Definition of "Mite Fighter" feat, - Definition for Metal Domain - mentioned in one spell only.. - "Luck" spell is mentioned in several race entries. There is no definition of "Luck" spell, but "Good Luck" and "Bad Luck" - DC / Casterlevel for classes and domains info (if that was designed) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Paul W. King (kingpaul) Date: 2006-08-24 10:22 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=277877 What, exactly, still needs to be asked of Bastion? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Martijn Verburg (karianna) Date: 2006-08-23 01:57 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=252169 Paul, looks like some PL work here... ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Andrew McDougall (tir-gwaith) Date: 2006-03-19 14:49 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=208239 I've adjusted the feats_hidden Fey trait stuff for CASTERLEVEL and DC. Removed #6 - Metal domain reference. Still a bunch of CASTERLEVEL/DC stuff - for classes, mostly. This set is going to need some clarifications, and then some good Data massaging to get all this to work. Committing what I've done so far. David, I'm going to need a PR contact to the publisher for the "Mite Fighter" feat, Domain Metal reference in the single spell, for now. Also need to get ahold of the original entry author and clarify Spell DC/Casterlevel for classes and domains objects. Along with what "Luck" is for SPELLS entry for some races. Both "Good Luck" and "Bad Luck" spells? Send the original author a ZIP of the SVN repos folder for Faeries (Trunk\pcgen\data\alpha\bastionpress\faeries) of Revision 324 or later. That should help him with some of his questions. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Eddy Anthony (eddyanthony) Date: 2005-12-08 19:49 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=886893 Response from Darkon: > 1 - BONUS:VAR with [PRELEVEL] > > # What is meant by "(TL+9)/8[PRELEVEL:3]" ? - Tir Gwaith At third level, a [insert race name here] may pick one ECL point value of Faerie Racial Traits (Including spell-like abilities). Every four levels there thereafter, a [insert race name here] can select an additional half ECL point value of traits or save them to purchase more expensive abilities later. > 2 - DC / CASTERLEVEL for various SPELLS tags These abilities are as the spell cast by a sorceror of the [insert race name here] character level. > 3 - DEITY tag in class object. I'm not sure about this > one, but listed in prettylst. > > data\alpha\bastionpress\faeries\faeries_classes.lst > (Line 6): The tag "DEITY" from "DEITY:None > (Faemancer)" is not in the CLASS tag list Domain (Su): The Faemancer, through experience and luck and the blessings of the FaerieLand, gains access to divine spells. The domain should not be one available to the faemancer from any previous classes, and can be one of the following domains: Air, Animal, Chaos, Dream, Fey, Luck, Magic, Plant, Protection, Travel or Trickery. There spells are retrieved by the fey companions the same as arcane spells are. All faemancer levels count as divine levels when casting these spells. Divine material foci are still required when listed in the spell description, but the spells are otherwise unchanged. New domains asr gained at 3rd, 6th and 9th levels. > 4 - Missing Feat "Mite Fighter" Referenced in several > PREFEAT: checks. There is an "Improved Mite Fighter" > feat (and it needs the original) Apparently the author neglected to add the Mite Fighter feat to the book. Obviously an oversite on his part and mine for not catching something like that. It most likely works like the Improved version but with only a +1 bonus since improved is +2. > 5 - Several SPELLS entries I'm not sure what is meant. > (Luck, when the spells file lists "Good Luck" and "Bad > Luck", that sort of thing) > > data\alpha\bastionpress\faeries\faeries_feats_hidden.lst > (Line 86): No SPELL entry for "SPELLS:Shrink" > data\alpha\bastionpress\faeries\faeries_races.lst > (Line 9): No SPELL entry for "SPELLS:Luck" > (Line 13): No SPELL entry for "SPELLS:Luck" > (Line 15): No SPELL entry for "SPELLS:Luck" > data\alpha\bastionpress\faeries\faeries_templates_focus.lst > (Line 44): No SPELL entry for "SPELLS:Clairaudience" > (Line 44): No SPELL entry for "SPELLS:Clairvoyance" > (Line 45): No SPELL entry for "SPELLS:Contact Outer > Plane" My version of the source no longer has a faeries_feats_hidden.list. Do you know the names of the feats making these references. That way I can look them up and see what their talking about. > 6 - Reference to a "Metal" domain, when there isn't one > in the set or the SRD. > > data\alpha\bastionpress\faeries\faeries_spells.lst > (Line 42): No DOMAIN entry for "DOMAINS:Metal" Only the Fey and Fey Roads domains are introduced in this book but it does make use of the oathbound campaign but I can't find it there either. I would suggest removing the domain entry and wait to see if someone comments on it, then we may find out where that domain was introduced. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Eddy Anthony (eddyanthony) Date: 2005-12-08 06:25 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=886893 I've got no problem with fixing these under one blanket tracker, it all get documented one way or the other. I've sent off an email to Darkon to see if he can clear any of this up. If he can great, If we can't get them all knocked out then we can open separate trackers for the remaining issus. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Andrew McDougall (tir-gwaith) Date: 2005-12-08 01:34 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=208239 File version 1.1 commit comment: [ 1048965 ] Bastion Press - Faeries New souce entered by Darkon Turas When these get fixed, it would be good to add right under the #CVS line - #Original Author: Darkon Turas ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Andrew McDougall (tir-gwaith) Date: 2005-12-08 01:32 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=208239 Section 15 lists "Darkon Turas, Eddy Anthony (MoSaT), Andrew McDougall (Tir Gwaith)." I'd say original author is Darkon Turas, even tho there isn't a comment at the top deliniating it (I can add that at the top if this is the case.) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Martijn Verburg (karianna) Date: 2005-12-08 01:20 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=252169 Hmmm normally I'd say seperate trackers, but we've had several items wrapped up like this recently on the data side, it seems most of the time data monkeys like to fix these in a batch. I'll definitely split it later if need be. Eddy, who was the author of this LST file? - K ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Andrew McDougall (tir-gwaith) Date: 2005-12-07 15:39 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=208239 Kar, Outstanding issues - separate trackers for each one? I don't own the source... Eddy might have a clue on some of these... I leave it in your capable paws. When whatever is done for the outside issues tracker-wise, this one can be closed. I'm committing the major cleanup as soon as I add myself to the COPYRIGHT and OGL.txt sections. - Tir Gwaith ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=750091&aid=1375795&group_id=25576 |
From: SourceForge.net <no...@so...> - 2007-11-22 03:14:34
|
Data Bugs item #1375795, was opened at 2005-12-07 18:35 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by kingpaul You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=750091&aid=1375795&group_id=25576 Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the comment thread, including the initial issue submission, for this request, not just the latest update. Category: Missing Source Information Group: For 5.14 Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 6 Private: No Submitted By: Andrew McDougall (tir-gwaith) Assigned to: Maredudd (maredudd800) Summary: [Bastion Press] Faeries cleanup Initial Comment: Lots of Prettylst cleanup. JEP cleanup reorganized file structure to put hidden feats in separate file as standard Lots of linking cleanup - bad references Outstanding issues: 1 - BONUS:VAR with [PRELEVEL] # What is meant by "(TL+9)/8[PRELEVEL:3]" ? - Tir Gwaith # - (TL+9)/8|PRELEVEL:3 # - (TL+9)/8|!PRELEVEL:3 prettylst lines: data\alpha\bastionpress\faeries\faeries_races.lst (Line 9): Jep syntax error found near "[PRELEVEL:3]" in "BONUS:VAR|RacialTraitsECL|(TL+9)/8[PRELEVEL:3]" (Line 11): Jep syntax error found near "[PRELEVEL:3]" in "BONUS:VAR|RacialTraitsECL|(TL+9)/8[PRELEVEL:3]" (Line 12): Jep syntax error found near "[PRELEVEL:3]" in "BONUS:VAR|RacialTraitsECL|(TL+9)/8[PRELEVEL:3]" (Line 15): Jep syntax error found near "[PRELEVEL:3]" in "BONUS:VAR|RacialTraitsECL|(TL+9)/8[PRELEVEL:3]" 2 - DC / CASTERLEVEL for various SPELLS tags 3 - DEITY tag in class object. I'm not sure about this one, but listed in prettylst. data\alpha\bastionpress\faeries\faeries_classes.lst (Line 6): The tag "DEITY" from "DEITY:None (Faemancer)" is not in the CLASS tag list 4 - Missing Feat "Mite Fighter" Referenced in several PREFEAT: checks. There is an "Improved Mite Fighter" feat (and it needs the original) 5 - Several SPELLS entries I'm not sure what is meant. (Luck, when the spells file lists "Good Luck" and "Bad Luck", that sort of thing) data\alpha\bastionpress\faeries\faeries_feats_hidden.lst (Line 86): No SPELL entry for "SPELLS:Shrink" data\alpha\bastionpress\faeries\faeries_races.lst (Line 9): No SPELL entry for "SPELLS:Luck" (Line 13): No SPELL entry for "SPELLS:Luck" (Line 15): No SPELL entry for "SPELLS:Luck" data\alpha\bastionpress\faeries\faeries_templates_focus.lst (Line 44): No SPELL entry for "SPELLS:Clairaudience" (Line 44): No SPELL entry for "SPELLS:Clairvoyance" (Line 45): No SPELL entry for "SPELLS:Contact Outer Plane" 6 - Reference to a "Metal" domain, when there isn't one in the set or the SRD. data\alpha\bastionpress\faeries\faeries_spells.lst (Line 42): No DOMAIN entry for "DOMAINS:Metal" ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Paul W. King (kingpaul) Date: 2007-11-21 22:14 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=277877 Originator: NO I tried to get answers on this thread in the DW forums: http://dragonwing.net/Forum/index.php?topic=35.0 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: LegacyKing (amaitland) Date: 2007-11-21 03:37 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1286039 Originator: NO Requested Eric see what he can do on the PL side... Reassigning the Tracker to him for now. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Paul W. King (kingpaul) Date: 2007-06-24 00:42 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=277877 Originator: NO Tir, I've sent an email off to Steve about your questions. I know longer get emails from SF on tracker updates, so its a bit difficult for me to follow them anymore. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Andrew McDougall (tir-gwaith) Date: 2007-05-20 11:21 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=208239 Originator: YES Errata makes me feel this set needs even more work. NOT MENTIONED - Definition of "Mite Fighter" feat, NOT MENTIONED (in a previous source?) - Definition for Metal Domain - mentioned in one spell only.. NOT MENTIONED, but the like to leave a lot to 'DM' - "Luck" spell is mentioned in several race entries. There is no definition of "Luck" spell, but "Good Luck" and "Bad Luck" NOT MENTIONED - DC / Casterlevel for classes and domains info (if that was designed) Of NOTE: Q: Why does the feat “Insight of the Fey” require a base Will save +3 at 1st level? A: This should be a base Will save of +2 at 1st level. - Current dataset has 'Insight of the Fey' with the exact same requirements as Improved Mite Fighter (line above it). Mistake in the PREreqs, possibly extending beyond this feat (is more than one feat PRExxx off by one line?) Since this still requires further clarification, I'm downgrading Priority to past 5.12. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Andrew McDougall (tir-gwaith) Date: 2007-05-20 11:20 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=208239 Originator: YES Errata makes me feel this set needs even more work. NOT MENTIONED - Definition of "Mite Fighter" feat, NOT MENTIONED (in a previous source?) - Definition for Metal Domain - mentioned in one spell only.. NOT MENTIONED, but the like to leave a lot to 'DM' - "Luck" spell is mentioned in several race entries. There is no definition of "Luck" spell, but "Good Luck" and "Bad Luck" NOT MENTIONED - DC / Casterlevel for classes and domains info (if that was designed) Of NOTE: Q: Why does the feat “Insight of the Fey” require a base Will save +3 at 1st level? A: This should be a base Will save of +2 at 1st level. - Current dataset has 'Insight of the Fey' with the exact same requirements as Improved Mite Fighter (line above it). Mistake in the PREreqs, possibly extending beyond this feat (is more than one feat PRExxx off by one line?) Since this still requires further clarification, I'm downgrading Priority to past 5.12. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Paul W. King (kingpaul) Date: 2006-10-14 00:39 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=277877 Tir, Steve Creech pointed me to the errata page: http://dragonwing.net/downloads/Faeries_errata.pdf If this doesn't help you out, let me know and I'll get back to him. Paul ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Frank Kliewe (frank_kliewe) Date: 2006-08-30 18:32 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1241568 Setting Priority to 4, since we are waiting for outside input here. -- Frank ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Andrew McDougall (tir-gwaith) Date: 2006-08-24 21:06 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=208239 As mentioned in my comment earlier: - Definition of "Mite Fighter" feat, - Definition for Metal Domain - mentioned in one spell only.. - "Luck" spell is mentioned in several race entries. There is no definition of "Luck" spell, but "Good Luck" and "Bad Luck" - DC / Casterlevel for classes and domains info (if that was designed) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Paul W. King (kingpaul) Date: 2006-08-24 13:22 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=277877 What, exactly, still needs to be asked of Bastion? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Martijn Verburg (karianna) Date: 2006-08-23 04:57 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=252169 Paul, looks like some PL work here... ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Andrew McDougall (tir-gwaith) Date: 2006-03-19 17:49 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=208239 I've adjusted the feats_hidden Fey trait stuff for CASTERLEVEL and DC. Removed #6 - Metal domain reference. Still a bunch of CASTERLEVEL/DC stuff - for classes, mostly. This set is going to need some clarifications, and then some good Data massaging to get all this to work. Committing what I've done so far. David, I'm going to need a PR contact to the publisher for the "Mite Fighter" feat, Domain Metal reference in the single spell, for now. Also need to get ahold of the original entry author and clarify Spell DC/Casterlevel for classes and domains objects. Along with what "Luck" is for SPELLS entry for some races. Both "Good Luck" and "Bad Luck" spells? Send the original author a ZIP of the SVN repos folder for Faeries (Trunk\pcgen\data\alpha\bastionpress\faeries) of Revision 324 or later. That should help him with some of his questions. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Eddy Anthony (eddyanthony) Date: 2005-12-08 22:49 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=886893 Response from Darkon: > 1 - BONUS:VAR with [PRELEVEL] > > # What is meant by "(TL+9)/8[PRELEVEL:3]" ? - Tir Gwaith At third level, a [insert race name here] may pick one ECL point value of Faerie Racial Traits (Including spell-like abilities). Every four levels there thereafter, a [insert race name here] can select an additional half ECL point value of traits or save them to purchase more expensive abilities later. > 2 - DC / CASTERLEVEL for various SPELLS tags These abilities are as the spell cast by a sorceror of the [insert race name here] character level. > 3 - DEITY tag in class object. I'm not sure about this > one, but listed in prettylst. > > data\alpha\bastionpress\faeries\faeries_classes.lst > (Line 6): The tag "DEITY" from "DEITY:None > (Faemancer)" is not in the CLASS tag list Domain (Su): The Faemancer, through experience and luck and the blessings of the FaerieLand, gains access to divine spells. The domain should not be one available to the faemancer from any previous classes, and can be one of the following domains: Air, Animal, Chaos, Dream, Fey, Luck, Magic, Plant, Protection, Travel or Trickery. There spells are retrieved by the fey companions the same as arcane spells are. All faemancer levels count as divine levels when casting these spells. Divine material foci are still required when listed in the spell description, but the spells are otherwise unchanged. New domains asr gained at 3rd, 6th and 9th levels. > 4 - Missing Feat "Mite Fighter" Referenced in several > PREFEAT: checks. There is an "Improved Mite Fighter" > feat (and it needs the original) Apparently the author neglected to add the Mite Fighter feat to the book. Obviously an oversite on his part and mine for not catching something like that. It most likely works like the Improved version but with only a +1 bonus since improved is +2. > 5 - Several SPELLS entries I'm not sure what is meant. > (Luck, when the spells file lists "Good Luck" and "Bad > Luck", that sort of thing) > > data\alpha\bastionpress\faeries\faeries_feats_hidden.lst > (Line 86): No SPELL entry for "SPELLS:Shrink" > data\alpha\bastionpress\faeries\faeries_races.lst > (Line 9): No SPELL entry for "SPELLS:Luck" > (Line 13): No SPELL entry for "SPELLS:Luck" > (Line 15): No SPELL entry for "SPELLS:Luck" > data\alpha\bastionpress\faeries\faeries_templates_focus.lst > (Line 44): No SPELL entry for "SPELLS:Clairaudience" > (Line 44): No SPELL entry for "SPELLS:Clairvoyance" > (Line 45): No SPELL entry for "SPELLS:Contact Outer > Plane" My version of the source no longer has a faeries_feats_hidden.list. Do you know the names of the feats making these references. That way I can look them up and see what their talking about. > 6 - Reference to a "Metal" domain, when there isn't one > in the set or the SRD. > > data\alpha\bastionpress\faeries\faeries_spells.lst > (Line 42): No DOMAIN entry for "DOMAINS:Metal" Only the Fey and Fey Roads domains are introduced in this book but it does make use of the oathbound campaign but I can't find it there either. I would suggest removing the domain entry and wait to see if someone comments on it, then we may find out where that domain was introduced. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Eddy Anthony (eddyanthony) Date: 2005-12-08 09:25 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=886893 I've got no problem with fixing these under one blanket tracker, it all get documented one way or the other. I've sent off an email to Darkon to see if he can clear any of this up. If he can great, If we can't get them all knocked out then we can open separate trackers for the remaining issus. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Andrew McDougall (tir-gwaith) Date: 2005-12-08 04:34 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=208239 File version 1.1 commit comment: [ 1048965 ] Bastion Press - Faeries New souce entered by Darkon Turas When these get fixed, it would be good to add right under the #CVS line - #Original Author: Darkon Turas ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Andrew McDougall (tir-gwaith) Date: 2005-12-08 04:32 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=208239 Section 15 lists "Darkon Turas, Eddy Anthony (MoSaT), Andrew McDougall (Tir Gwaith)." I'd say original author is Darkon Turas, even tho there isn't a comment at the top deliniating it (I can add that at the top if this is the case.) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Martijn Verburg (karianna) Date: 2005-12-08 04:20 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=252169 Hmmm normally I'd say seperate trackers, but we've had several items wrapped up like this recently on the data side, it seems most of the time data monkeys like to fix these in a batch. I'll definitely split it later if need be. Eddy, who was the author of this LST file? - K ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Andrew McDougall (tir-gwaith) Date: 2005-12-07 18:39 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=208239 Kar, Outstanding issues - separate trackers for each one? I don't own the source... Eddy might have a clue on some of these... I leave it in your capable paws. When whatever is done for the outside issues tracker-wise, this one can be closed. I'm committing the major cleanup as soon as I add myself to the COPYRIGHT and OGL.txt sections. - Tir Gwaith ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=750091&aid=1375795&group_id=25576 |
From: SourceForge.net <no...@so...> - 2007-12-08 03:33:04
|
Data Bugs item #1375795, was opened at 2005-12-07 18:35 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by nylanfs You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=750091&aid=1375795&group_id=25576 Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the comment thread, including the initial issue submission, for this request, not just the latest update. Category: Missing Source Information Group: For 5.14 Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 6 Private: No Submitted By: Andrew McDougall (tir-gwaith) Assigned to: Maredudd (maredudd800) Summary: [Bastion Press] Faeries cleanup Initial Comment: Lots of Prettylst cleanup. JEP cleanup reorganized file structure to put hidden feats in separate file as standard Lots of linking cleanup - bad references Outstanding issues: 1 - BONUS:VAR with [PRELEVEL] # What is meant by "(TL+9)/8[PRELEVEL:3]" ? - Tir Gwaith # - (TL+9)/8|PRELEVEL:3 # - (TL+9)/8|!PRELEVEL:3 prettylst lines: data\alpha\bastionpress\faeries\faeries_races.lst (Line 9): Jep syntax error found near "[PRELEVEL:3]" in "BONUS:VAR|RacialTraitsECL|(TL+9)/8[PRELEVEL:3]" (Line 11): Jep syntax error found near "[PRELEVEL:3]" in "BONUS:VAR|RacialTraitsECL|(TL+9)/8[PRELEVEL:3]" (Line 12): Jep syntax error found near "[PRELEVEL:3]" in "BONUS:VAR|RacialTraitsECL|(TL+9)/8[PRELEVEL:3]" (Line 15): Jep syntax error found near "[PRELEVEL:3]" in "BONUS:VAR|RacialTraitsECL|(TL+9)/8[PRELEVEL:3]" 2 - DC / CASTERLEVEL for various SPELLS tags 3 - DEITY tag in class object. I'm not sure about this one, but listed in prettylst. data\alpha\bastionpress\faeries\faeries_classes.lst (Line 6): The tag "DEITY" from "DEITY:None (Faemancer)" is not in the CLASS tag list 4 - Missing Feat "Mite Fighter" Referenced in several PREFEAT: checks. There is an "Improved Mite Fighter" feat (and it needs the original) 5 - Several SPELLS entries I'm not sure what is meant. (Luck, when the spells file lists "Good Luck" and "Bad Luck", that sort of thing) data\alpha\bastionpress\faeries\faeries_feats_hidden.lst (Line 86): No SPELL entry for "SPELLS:Shrink" data\alpha\bastionpress\faeries\faeries_races.lst (Line 9): No SPELL entry for "SPELLS:Luck" (Line 13): No SPELL entry for "SPELLS:Luck" (Line 15): No SPELL entry for "SPELLS:Luck" data\alpha\bastionpress\faeries\faeries_templates_focus.lst (Line 44): No SPELL entry for "SPELLS:Clairaudience" (Line 44): No SPELL entry for "SPELLS:Clairvoyance" (Line 45): No SPELL entry for "SPELLS:Contact Outer Plane" 6 - Reference to a "Metal" domain, when there isn't one in the set or the SRD. data\alpha\bastionpress\faeries\faeries_spells.lst (Line 42): No DOMAIN entry for "DOMAINS:Metal" ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Paul Grosse (nylanfs) Date: 2007-12-07 22:33 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=928124 Originator: NO Mite Fighter isn't listed anywhere in the source it is a Pre-req for Improved Mite Fighter. It's listed as being detailed in Spells and Magic. And isn't mentioned in the Sec. 15 Good luck is mentioned in the Feeorin racial abilities Luck is referenced in listed in the Bogie, Half-Fey and Sprite I would say that it is referencing the "Luck of the Fey" spell and not the Good or Bad luck spells but was changed to Luck for printing purposes, or it's a typo. The DC/Caster level for the racial info is as a sorcerer of the same character level, so it's CHA based. Insite of the Fey is listed with Base Will save at +3 but errata'd to +2 What classes abilities need the DC's? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Paul W. King (kingpaul) Date: 2007-11-21 22:14 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=277877 Originator: NO I tried to get answers on this thread in the DW forums: http://dragonwing.net/Forum/index.php?topic=35.0 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: LegacyKing (amaitland) Date: 2007-11-21 03:37 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1286039 Originator: NO Requested Eric see what he can do on the PL side... Reassigning the Tracker to him for now. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Paul W. King (kingpaul) Date: 2007-06-24 00:42 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=277877 Originator: NO Tir, I've sent an email off to Steve about your questions. I know longer get emails from SF on tracker updates, so its a bit difficult for me to follow them anymore. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Andrew McDougall (tir-gwaith) Date: 2007-05-20 11:21 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=208239 Originator: YES Errata makes me feel this set needs even more work. NOT MENTIONED - Definition of "Mite Fighter" feat, NOT MENTIONED (in a previous source?) - Definition for Metal Domain - mentioned in one spell only.. NOT MENTIONED, but the like to leave a lot to 'DM' - "Luck" spell is mentioned in several race entries. There is no definition of "Luck" spell, but "Good Luck" and "Bad Luck" NOT MENTIONED - DC / Casterlevel for classes and domains info (if that was designed) Of NOTE: Q: Why does the feat “Insight of the Fey” require a base Will save +3 at 1st level? A: This should be a base Will save of +2 at 1st level. - Current dataset has 'Insight of the Fey' with the exact same requirements as Improved Mite Fighter (line above it). Mistake in the PREreqs, possibly extending beyond this feat (is more than one feat PRExxx off by one line?) Since this still requires further clarification, I'm downgrading Priority to past 5.12. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Andrew McDougall (tir-gwaith) Date: 2007-05-20 11:20 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=208239 Originator: YES Errata makes me feel this set needs even more work. NOT MENTIONED - Definition of "Mite Fighter" feat, NOT MENTIONED (in a previous source?) - Definition for Metal Domain - mentioned in one spell only.. NOT MENTIONED, but the like to leave a lot to 'DM' - "Luck" spell is mentioned in several race entries. There is no definition of "Luck" spell, but "Good Luck" and "Bad Luck" NOT MENTIONED - DC / Casterlevel for classes and domains info (if that was designed) Of NOTE: Q: Why does the feat “Insight of the Fey” require a base Will save +3 at 1st level? A: This should be a base Will save of +2 at 1st level. - Current dataset has 'Insight of the Fey' with the exact same requirements as Improved Mite Fighter (line above it). Mistake in the PREreqs, possibly extending beyond this feat (is more than one feat PRExxx off by one line?) Since this still requires further clarification, I'm downgrading Priority to past 5.12. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Paul W. King (kingpaul) Date: 2006-10-14 00:39 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=277877 Tir, Steve Creech pointed me to the errata page: http://dragonwing.net/downloads/Faeries_errata.pdf If this doesn't help you out, let me know and I'll get back to him. Paul ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Frank Kliewe (frank_kliewe) Date: 2006-08-30 18:32 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1241568 Setting Priority to 4, since we are waiting for outside input here. -- Frank ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Andrew McDougall (tir-gwaith) Date: 2006-08-24 21:06 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=208239 As mentioned in my comment earlier: - Definition of "Mite Fighter" feat, - Definition for Metal Domain - mentioned in one spell only.. - "Luck" spell is mentioned in several race entries. There is no definition of "Luck" spell, but "Good Luck" and "Bad Luck" - DC / Casterlevel for classes and domains info (if that was designed) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Paul W. King (kingpaul) Date: 2006-08-24 13:22 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=277877 What, exactly, still needs to be asked of Bastion? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Martijn Verburg (karianna) Date: 2006-08-23 04:57 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=252169 Paul, looks like some PL work here... ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Andrew McDougall (tir-gwaith) Date: 2006-03-19 17:49 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=208239 I've adjusted the feats_hidden Fey trait stuff for CASTERLEVEL and DC. Removed #6 - Metal domain reference. Still a bunch of CASTERLEVEL/DC stuff - for classes, mostly. This set is going to need some clarifications, and then some good Data massaging to get all this to work. Committing what I've done so far. David, I'm going to need a PR contact to the publisher for the "Mite Fighter" feat, Domain Metal reference in the single spell, for now. Also need to get ahold of the original entry author and clarify Spell DC/Casterlevel for classes and domains objects. Along with what "Luck" is for SPELLS entry for some races. Both "Good Luck" and "Bad Luck" spells? Send the original author a ZIP of the SVN repos folder for Faeries (Trunk\pcgen\data\alpha\bastionpress\faeries) of Revision 324 or later. That should help him with some of his questions. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Eddy Anthony (eddyanthony) Date: 2005-12-08 22:49 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=886893 Response from Darkon: > 1 - BONUS:VAR with [PRELEVEL] > > # What is meant by "(TL+9)/8[PRELEVEL:3]" ? - Tir Gwaith At third level, a [insert race name here] may pick one ECL point value of Faerie Racial Traits (Including spell-like abilities). Every four levels there thereafter, a [insert race name here] can select an additional half ECL point value of traits or save them to purchase more expensive abilities later. > 2 - DC / CASTERLEVEL for various SPELLS tags These abilities are as the spell cast by a sorceror of the [insert race name here] character level. > 3 - DEITY tag in class object. I'm not sure about this > one, but listed in prettylst. > > data\alpha\bastionpress\faeries\faeries_classes.lst > (Line 6): The tag "DEITY" from "DEITY:None > (Faemancer)" is not in the CLASS tag list Domain (Su): The Faemancer, through experience and luck and the blessings of the FaerieLand, gains access to divine spells. The domain should not be one available to the faemancer from any previous classes, and can be one of the following domains: Air, Animal, Chaos, Dream, Fey, Luck, Magic, Plant, Protection, Travel or Trickery. There spells are retrieved by the fey companions the same as arcane spells are. All faemancer levels count as divine levels when casting these spells. Divine material foci are still required when listed in the spell description, but the spells are otherwise unchanged. New domains asr gained at 3rd, 6th and 9th levels. > 4 - Missing Feat "Mite Fighter" Referenced in several > PREFEAT: checks. There is an "Improved Mite Fighter" > feat (and it needs the original) Apparently the author neglected to add the Mite Fighter feat to the book. Obviously an oversite on his part and mine for not catching something like that. It most likely works like the Improved version but with only a +1 bonus since improved is +2. > 5 - Several SPELLS entries I'm not sure what is meant. > (Luck, when the spells file lists "Good Luck" and "Bad > Luck", that sort of thing) > > data\alpha\bastionpress\faeries\faeries_feats_hidden.lst > (Line 86): No SPELL entry for "SPELLS:Shrink" > data\alpha\bastionpress\faeries\faeries_races.lst > (Line 9): No SPELL entry for "SPELLS:Luck" > (Line 13): No SPELL entry for "SPELLS:Luck" > (Line 15): No SPELL entry for "SPELLS:Luck" > data\alpha\bastionpress\faeries\faeries_templates_focus.lst > (Line 44): No SPELL entry for "SPELLS:Clairaudience" > (Line 44): No SPELL entry for "SPELLS:Clairvoyance" > (Line 45): No SPELL entry for "SPELLS:Contact Outer > Plane" My version of the source no longer has a faeries_feats_hidden.list. Do you know the names of the feats making these references. That way I can look them up and see what their talking about. > 6 - Reference to a "Metal" domain, when there isn't one > in the set or the SRD. > > data\alpha\bastionpress\faeries\faeries_spells.lst > (Line 42): No DOMAIN entry for "DOMAINS:Metal" Only the Fey and Fey Roads domains are introduced in this book but it does make use of the oathbound campaign but I can't find it there either. I would suggest removing the domain entry and wait to see if someone comments on it, then we may find out where that domain was introduced. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Eddy Anthony (eddyanthony) Date: 2005-12-08 09:25 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=886893 I've got no problem with fixing these under one blanket tracker, it all get documented one way or the other. I've sent off an email to Darkon to see if he can clear any of this up. If he can great, If we can't get them all knocked out then we can open separate trackers for the remaining issus. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Andrew McDougall (tir-gwaith) Date: 2005-12-08 04:34 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=208239 File version 1.1 commit comment: [ 1048965 ] Bastion Press - Faeries New souce entered by Darkon Turas When these get fixed, it would be good to add right under the #CVS line - #Original Author: Darkon Turas ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Andrew McDougall (tir-gwaith) Date: 2005-12-08 04:32 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=208239 Section 15 lists "Darkon Turas, Eddy Anthony (MoSaT), Andrew McDougall (Tir Gwaith)." I'd say original author is Darkon Turas, even tho there isn't a comment at the top deliniating it (I can add that at the top if this is the case.) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Martijn Verburg (karianna) Date: 2005-12-08 04:20 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=252169 Hmmm normally I'd say seperate trackers, but we've had several items wrapped up like this recently on the data side, it seems most of the time data monkeys like to fix these in a batch. I'll definitely split it later if need be. Eddy, who was the author of this LST file? - K ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Andrew McDougall (tir-gwaith) Date: 2005-12-07 18:39 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=208239 Kar, Outstanding issues - separate trackers for each one? I don't own the source... Eddy might have a clue on some of these... I leave it in your capable paws. When whatever is done for the outside issues tracker-wise, this one can be closed. I'm committing the major cleanup as soon as I add myself to the COPYRIGHT and OGL.txt sections. - Tir Gwaith ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=750091&aid=1375795&group_id=25576 |
From: SourceForge.net <no...@so...> - 2007-12-11 01:49:47
|
Data Bugs item #1375795, was opened at 2005-12-07 18:35 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by nylanfs You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=750091&aid=1375795&group_id=25576 Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the comment thread, including the initial issue submission, for this request, not just the latest update. Category: Missing Source Information Group: For 5.14 Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 6 Private: No Submitted By: Andrew McDougall (tir-gwaith) Assigned to: Maredudd (maredudd800) Summary: [Bastion Press] Faeries cleanup Initial Comment: Lots of Prettylst cleanup. JEP cleanup reorganized file structure to put hidden feats in separate file as standard Lots of linking cleanup - bad references Outstanding issues: 1 - BONUS:VAR with [PRELEVEL] # What is meant by "(TL+9)/8[PRELEVEL:3]" ? - Tir Gwaith # - (TL+9)/8|PRELEVEL:3 # - (TL+9)/8|!PRELEVEL:3 prettylst lines: data\alpha\bastionpress\faeries\faeries_races.lst (Line 9): Jep syntax error found near "[PRELEVEL:3]" in "BONUS:VAR|RacialTraitsECL|(TL+9)/8[PRELEVEL:3]" (Line 11): Jep syntax error found near "[PRELEVEL:3]" in "BONUS:VAR|RacialTraitsECL|(TL+9)/8[PRELEVEL:3]" (Line 12): Jep syntax error found near "[PRELEVEL:3]" in "BONUS:VAR|RacialTraitsECL|(TL+9)/8[PRELEVEL:3]" (Line 15): Jep syntax error found near "[PRELEVEL:3]" in "BONUS:VAR|RacialTraitsECL|(TL+9)/8[PRELEVEL:3]" 2 - DC / CASTERLEVEL for various SPELLS tags 3 - DEITY tag in class object. I'm not sure about this one, but listed in prettylst. data\alpha\bastionpress\faeries\faeries_classes.lst (Line 6): The tag "DEITY" from "DEITY:None (Faemancer)" is not in the CLASS tag list 4 - Missing Feat "Mite Fighter" Referenced in several PREFEAT: checks. There is an "Improved Mite Fighter" feat (and it needs the original) 5 - Several SPELLS entries I'm not sure what is meant. (Luck, when the spells file lists "Good Luck" and "Bad Luck", that sort of thing) data\alpha\bastionpress\faeries\faeries_feats_hidden.lst (Line 86): No SPELL entry for "SPELLS:Shrink" data\alpha\bastionpress\faeries\faeries_races.lst (Line 9): No SPELL entry for "SPELLS:Luck" (Line 13): No SPELL entry for "SPELLS:Luck" (Line 15): No SPELL entry for "SPELLS:Luck" data\alpha\bastionpress\faeries\faeries_templates_focus.lst (Line 44): No SPELL entry for "SPELLS:Clairaudience" (Line 44): No SPELL entry for "SPELLS:Clairvoyance" (Line 45): No SPELL entry for "SPELLS:Contact Outer Plane" 6 - Reference to a "Metal" domain, when there isn't one in the set or the SRD. data\alpha\bastionpress\faeries\faeries_spells.lst (Line 42): No DOMAIN entry for "DOMAINS:Metal" ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Paul Grosse (nylanfs) Date: 2007-12-10 20:49 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=928124 Originator: NO Found my pdf copy of Spells and Magic. Here's the Mite fighter feat. Mite Fighter [General] You are especially adept at battling creatures smaller than yourself. Prerequisites: Base Reflex Save +4, Base Attack Bonus +4 Benefit: When fighting a creature smaller than yourself, you gain a +2 bonus on your attack rolls. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Paul Grosse (nylanfs) Date: 2007-12-07 22:33 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=928124 Originator: NO Mite Fighter isn't listed anywhere in the source it is a Pre-req for Improved Mite Fighter. It's listed as being detailed in Spells and Magic. And isn't mentioned in the Sec. 15 Good luck is mentioned in the Feeorin racial abilities Luck is referenced in listed in the Bogie, Half-Fey and Sprite I would say that it is referencing the "Luck of the Fey" spell and not the Good or Bad luck spells but was changed to Luck for printing purposes, or it's a typo. The DC/Caster level for the racial info is as a sorcerer of the same character level, so it's CHA based. Insite of the Fey is listed with Base Will save at +3 but errata'd to +2 What classes abilities need the DC's? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Paul W. King (kingpaul) Date: 2007-11-21 22:14 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=277877 Originator: NO I tried to get answers on this thread in the DW forums: http://dragonwing.net/Forum/index.php?topic=35.0 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: LegacyKing (amaitland) Date: 2007-11-21 03:37 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1286039 Originator: NO Requested Eric see what he can do on the PL side... Reassigning the Tracker to him for now. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Paul W. King (kingpaul) Date: 2007-06-24 00:42 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=277877 Originator: NO Tir, I've sent an email off to Steve about your questions. I know longer get emails from SF on tracker updates, so its a bit difficult for me to follow them anymore. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Andrew McDougall (tir-gwaith) Date: 2007-05-20 11:21 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=208239 Originator: YES Errata makes me feel this set needs even more work. NOT MENTIONED - Definition of "Mite Fighter" feat, NOT MENTIONED (in a previous source?) - Definition for Metal Domain - mentioned in one spell only.. NOT MENTIONED, but the like to leave a lot to 'DM' - "Luck" spell is mentioned in several race entries. There is no definition of "Luck" spell, but "Good Luck" and "Bad Luck" NOT MENTIONED - DC / Casterlevel for classes and domains info (if that was designed) Of NOTE: Q: Why does the feat “Insight of the Fey” require a base Will save +3 at 1st level? A: This should be a base Will save of +2 at 1st level. - Current dataset has 'Insight of the Fey' with the exact same requirements as Improved Mite Fighter (line above it). Mistake in the PREreqs, possibly extending beyond this feat (is more than one feat PRExxx off by one line?) Since this still requires further clarification, I'm downgrading Priority to past 5.12. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Andrew McDougall (tir-gwaith) Date: 2007-05-20 11:20 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=208239 Originator: YES Errata makes me feel this set needs even more work. NOT MENTIONED - Definition of "Mite Fighter" feat, NOT MENTIONED (in a previous source?) - Definition for Metal Domain - mentioned in one spell only.. NOT MENTIONED, but the like to leave a lot to 'DM' - "Luck" spell is mentioned in several race entries. There is no definition of "Luck" spell, but "Good Luck" and "Bad Luck" NOT MENTIONED - DC / Casterlevel for classes and domains info (if that was designed) Of NOTE: Q: Why does the feat “Insight of the Fey” require a base Will save +3 at 1st level? A: This should be a base Will save of +2 at 1st level. - Current dataset has 'Insight of the Fey' with the exact same requirements as Improved Mite Fighter (line above it). Mistake in the PREreqs, possibly extending beyond this feat (is more than one feat PRExxx off by one line?) Since this still requires further clarification, I'm downgrading Priority to past 5.12. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Paul W. King (kingpaul) Date: 2006-10-14 00:39 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=277877 Tir, Steve Creech pointed me to the errata page: http://dragonwing.net/downloads/Faeries_errata.pdf If this doesn't help you out, let me know and I'll get back to him. Paul ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Frank Kliewe (frank_kliewe) Date: 2006-08-30 18:32 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1241568 Setting Priority to 4, since we are waiting for outside input here. -- Frank ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Andrew McDougall (tir-gwaith) Date: 2006-08-24 21:06 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=208239 As mentioned in my comment earlier: - Definition of "Mite Fighter" feat, - Definition for Metal Domain - mentioned in one spell only.. - "Luck" spell is mentioned in several race entries. There is no definition of "Luck" spell, but "Good Luck" and "Bad Luck" - DC / Casterlevel for classes and domains info (if that was designed) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Paul W. King (kingpaul) Date: 2006-08-24 13:22 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=277877 What, exactly, still needs to be asked of Bastion? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Martijn Verburg (karianna) Date: 2006-08-23 04:57 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=252169 Paul, looks like some PL work here... ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Andrew McDougall (tir-gwaith) Date: 2006-03-19 17:49 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=208239 I've adjusted the feats_hidden Fey trait stuff for CASTERLEVEL and DC. Removed #6 - Metal domain reference. Still a bunch of CASTERLEVEL/DC stuff - for classes, mostly. This set is going to need some clarifications, and then some good Data massaging to get all this to work. Committing what I've done so far. David, I'm going to need a PR contact to the publisher for the "Mite Fighter" feat, Domain Metal reference in the single spell, for now. Also need to get ahold of the original entry author and clarify Spell DC/Casterlevel for classes and domains objects. Along with what "Luck" is for SPELLS entry for some races. Both "Good Luck" and "Bad Luck" spells? Send the original author a ZIP of the SVN repos folder for Faeries (Trunk\pcgen\data\alpha\bastionpress\faeries) of Revision 324 or later. That should help him with some of his questions. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Eddy Anthony (eddyanthony) Date: 2005-12-08 22:49 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=886893 Response from Darkon: > 1 - BONUS:VAR with [PRELEVEL] > > # What is meant by "(TL+9)/8[PRELEVEL:3]" ? - Tir Gwaith At third level, a [insert race name here] may pick one ECL point value of Faerie Racial Traits (Including spell-like abilities). Every four levels there thereafter, a [insert race name here] can select an additional half ECL point value of traits or save them to purchase more expensive abilities later. > 2 - DC / CASTERLEVEL for various SPELLS tags These abilities are as the spell cast by a sorceror of the [insert race name here] character level. > 3 - DEITY tag in class object. I'm not sure about this > one, but listed in prettylst. > > data\alpha\bastionpress\faeries\faeries_classes.lst > (Line 6): The tag "DEITY" from "DEITY:None > (Faemancer)" is not in the CLASS tag list Domain (Su): The Faemancer, through experience and luck and the blessings of the FaerieLand, gains access to divine spells. The domain should not be one available to the faemancer from any previous classes, and can be one of the following domains: Air, Animal, Chaos, Dream, Fey, Luck, Magic, Plant, Protection, Travel or Trickery. There spells are retrieved by the fey companions the same as arcane spells are. All faemancer levels count as divine levels when casting these spells. Divine material foci are still required when listed in the spell description, but the spells are otherwise unchanged. New domains asr gained at 3rd, 6th and 9th levels. > 4 - Missing Feat "Mite Fighter" Referenced in several > PREFEAT: checks. There is an "Improved Mite Fighter" > feat (and it needs the original) Apparently the author neglected to add the Mite Fighter feat to the book. Obviously an oversite on his part and mine for not catching something like that. It most likely works like the Improved version but with only a +1 bonus since improved is +2. > 5 - Several SPELLS entries I'm not sure what is meant. > (Luck, when the spells file lists "Good Luck" and "Bad > Luck", that sort of thing) > > data\alpha\bastionpress\faeries\faeries_feats_hidden.lst > (Line 86): No SPELL entry for "SPELLS:Shrink" > data\alpha\bastionpress\faeries\faeries_races.lst > (Line 9): No SPELL entry for "SPELLS:Luck" > (Line 13): No SPELL entry for "SPELLS:Luck" > (Line 15): No SPELL entry for "SPELLS:Luck" > data\alpha\bastionpress\faeries\faeries_templates_focus.lst > (Line 44): No SPELL entry for "SPELLS:Clairaudience" > (Line 44): No SPELL entry for "SPELLS:Clairvoyance" > (Line 45): No SPELL entry for "SPELLS:Contact Outer > Plane" My version of the source no longer has a faeries_feats_hidden.list. Do you know the names of the feats making these references. That way I can look them up and see what their talking about. > 6 - Reference to a "Metal" domain, when there isn't one > in the set or the SRD. > > data\alpha\bastionpress\faeries\faeries_spells.lst > (Line 42): No DOMAIN entry for "DOMAINS:Metal" Only the Fey and Fey Roads domains are introduced in this book but it does make use of the oathbound campaign but I can't find it there either. I would suggest removing the domain entry and wait to see if someone comments on it, then we may find out where that domain was introduced. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Eddy Anthony (eddyanthony) Date: 2005-12-08 09:25 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=886893 I've got no problem with fixing these under one blanket tracker, it all get documented one way or the other. I've sent off an email to Darkon to see if he can clear any of this up. If he can great, If we can't get them all knocked out then we can open separate trackers for the remaining issus. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Andrew McDougall (tir-gwaith) Date: 2005-12-08 04:34 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=208239 File version 1.1 commit comment: [ 1048965 ] Bastion Press - Faeries New souce entered by Darkon Turas When these get fixed, it would be good to add right under the #CVS line - #Original Author: Darkon Turas ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Andrew McDougall (tir-gwaith) Date: 2005-12-08 04:32 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=208239 Section 15 lists "Darkon Turas, Eddy Anthony (MoSaT), Andrew McDougall (Tir Gwaith)." I'd say original author is Darkon Turas, even tho there isn't a comment at the top deliniating it (I can add that at the top if this is the case.) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Martijn Verburg (karianna) Date: 2005-12-08 04:20 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=252169 Hmmm normally I'd say seperate trackers, but we've had several items wrapped up like this recently on the data side, it seems most of the time data monkeys like to fix these in a batch. I'll definitely split it later if need be. Eddy, who was the author of this LST file? - K ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Andrew McDougall (tir-gwaith) Date: 2005-12-07 18:39 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=208239 Kar, Outstanding issues - separate trackers for each one? I don't own the source... Eddy might have a clue on some of these... I leave it in your capable paws. When whatever is done for the outside issues tracker-wise, this one can be closed. I'm committing the major cleanup as soon as I add myself to the COPYRIGHT and OGL.txt sections. - Tir Gwaith ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=750091&aid=1375795&group_id=25576 |
From: SourceForge.net <no...@so...> - 2008-05-18 03:32:01
|
Data Bugs item #1375795, was opened at 2005-12-07 15:35 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by amaitland You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=750091&aid=1375795&group_id=25576 Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the comment thread, including the initial issue submission, for this request, not just the latest update. Category: Missing Source Information Group: For 5.14 Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 6 Private: No Submitted By: Andrew McDougall (tir-gwaith) Assigned to: Maredudd (maredudd800) Summary: [Bastion Press] Faeries cleanup Initial Comment: Lots of Prettylst cleanup. JEP cleanup reorganized file structure to put hidden feats in separate file as standard Lots of linking cleanup - bad references Outstanding issues: 1 - BONUS:VAR with [PRELEVEL] # What is meant by "(TL+9)/8[PRELEVEL:3]" ? - Tir Gwaith # - (TL+9)/8|PRELEVEL:3 # - (TL+9)/8|!PRELEVEL:3 prettylst lines: data\alpha\bastionpress\faeries\faeries_races.lst (Line 9): Jep syntax error found near "[PRELEVEL:3]" in "BONUS:VAR|RacialTraitsECL|(TL+9)/8[PRELEVEL:3]" (Line 11): Jep syntax error found near "[PRELEVEL:3]" in "BONUS:VAR|RacialTraitsECL|(TL+9)/8[PRELEVEL:3]" (Line 12): Jep syntax error found near "[PRELEVEL:3]" in "BONUS:VAR|RacialTraitsECL|(TL+9)/8[PRELEVEL:3]" (Line 15): Jep syntax error found near "[PRELEVEL:3]" in "BONUS:VAR|RacialTraitsECL|(TL+9)/8[PRELEVEL:3]" 2 - DC / CASTERLEVEL for various SPELLS tags 3 - DEITY tag in class object. I'm not sure about this one, but listed in prettylst. data\alpha\bastionpress\faeries\faeries_classes.lst (Line 6): The tag "DEITY" from "DEITY:None (Faemancer)" is not in the CLASS tag list 4 - Missing Feat "Mite Fighter" Referenced in several PREFEAT: checks. There is an "Improved Mite Fighter" feat (and it needs the original) 5 - Several SPELLS entries I'm not sure what is meant. (Luck, when the spells file lists "Good Luck" and "Bad Luck", that sort of thing) data\alpha\bastionpress\faeries\faeries_feats_hidden.lst (Line 86): No SPELL entry for "SPELLS:Shrink" data\alpha\bastionpress\faeries\faeries_races.lst (Line 9): No SPELL entry for "SPELLS:Luck" (Line 13): No SPELL entry for "SPELLS:Luck" (Line 15): No SPELL entry for "SPELLS:Luck" data\alpha\bastionpress\faeries\faeries_templates_focus.lst (Line 44): No SPELL entry for "SPELLS:Clairaudience" (Line 44): No SPELL entry for "SPELLS:Clairvoyance" (Line 45): No SPELL entry for "SPELLS:Contact Outer Plane" 6 - Reference to a "Metal" domain, when there isn't one in the set or the SRD. data\alpha\bastionpress\faeries\faeries_spells.lst (Line 42): No DOMAIN entry for "DOMAINS:Metal" ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: LegacyKing (amaitland) Date: 2008-05-17 20:24 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1286039 Originator: NO Eric, where do we stand in this file? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Paul Grosse (nylanfs) Date: 2007-12-10 17:49 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=928124 Originator: NO Found my pdf copy of Spells and Magic. Here's the Mite fighter feat. Mite Fighter [General] You are especially adept at battling creatures smaller than yourself. Prerequisites: Base Reflex Save +4, Base Attack Bonus +4 Benefit: When fighting a creature smaller than yourself, you gain a +2 bonus on your attack rolls. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Paul Grosse (nylanfs) Date: 2007-12-07 19:33 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=928124 Originator: NO Mite Fighter isn't listed anywhere in the source it is a Pre-req for Improved Mite Fighter. It's listed as being detailed in Spells and Magic. And isn't mentioned in the Sec. 15 Good luck is mentioned in the Feeorin racial abilities Luck is referenced in listed in the Bogie, Half-Fey and Sprite I would say that it is referencing the "Luck of the Fey" spell and not the Good or Bad luck spells but was changed to Luck for printing purposes, or it's a typo. The DC/Caster level for the racial info is as a sorcerer of the same character level, so it's CHA based. Insite of the Fey is listed with Base Will save at +3 but errata'd to +2 What classes abilities need the DC's? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Paul W. King (kingpaul) Date: 2007-11-21 19:14 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=277877 Originator: NO I tried to get answers on this thread in the DW forums: http://dragonwing.net/Forum/index.php?topic=35.0 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: LegacyKing (amaitland) Date: 2007-11-21 00:37 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1286039 Originator: NO Requested Eric see what he can do on the PL side... Reassigning the Tracker to him for now. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Paul W. King (kingpaul) Date: 2007-06-23 21:42 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=277877 Originator: NO Tir, I've sent an email off to Steve about your questions. I know longer get emails from SF on tracker updates, so its a bit difficult for me to follow them anymore. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Andrew McDougall (tir-gwaith) Date: 2007-05-20 08:21 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=208239 Originator: YES Errata makes me feel this set needs even more work. NOT MENTIONED - Definition of "Mite Fighter" feat, NOT MENTIONED (in a previous source?) - Definition for Metal Domain - mentioned in one spell only.. NOT MENTIONED, but the like to leave a lot to 'DM' - "Luck" spell is mentioned in several race entries. There is no definition of "Luck" spell, but "Good Luck" and "Bad Luck" NOT MENTIONED - DC / Casterlevel for classes and domains info (if that was designed) Of NOTE: Q: Why does the feat “Insight of the Fey” require a base Will save +3 at 1st level? A: This should be a base Will save of +2 at 1st level. - Current dataset has 'Insight of the Fey' with the exact same requirements as Improved Mite Fighter (line above it). Mistake in the PREreqs, possibly extending beyond this feat (is more than one feat PRExxx off by one line?) Since this still requires further clarification, I'm downgrading Priority to past 5.12. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Andrew McDougall (tir-gwaith) Date: 2007-05-20 08:20 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=208239 Originator: YES Errata makes me feel this set needs even more work. NOT MENTIONED - Definition of "Mite Fighter" feat, NOT MENTIONED (in a previous source?) - Definition for Metal Domain - mentioned in one spell only.. NOT MENTIONED, but the like to leave a lot to 'DM' - "Luck" spell is mentioned in several race entries. There is no definition of "Luck" spell, but "Good Luck" and "Bad Luck" NOT MENTIONED - DC / Casterlevel for classes and domains info (if that was designed) Of NOTE: Q: Why does the feat “Insight of the Fey” require a base Will save +3 at 1st level? A: This should be a base Will save of +2 at 1st level. - Current dataset has 'Insight of the Fey' with the exact same requirements as Improved Mite Fighter (line above it). Mistake in the PREreqs, possibly extending beyond this feat (is more than one feat PRExxx off by one line?) Since this still requires further clarification, I'm downgrading Priority to past 5.12. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Paul W. King (kingpaul) Date: 2006-10-13 21:39 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=277877 Tir, Steve Creech pointed me to the errata page: http://dragonwing.net/downloads/Faeries_errata.pdf If this doesn't help you out, let me know and I'll get back to him. Paul ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Frank Kliewe (frank_kliewe) Date: 2006-08-30 15:32 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1241568 Setting Priority to 4, since we are waiting for outside input here. -- Frank ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Andrew McDougall (tir-gwaith) Date: 2006-08-24 18:06 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=208239 As mentioned in my comment earlier: - Definition of "Mite Fighter" feat, - Definition for Metal Domain - mentioned in one spell only.. - "Luck" spell is mentioned in several race entries. There is no definition of "Luck" spell, but "Good Luck" and "Bad Luck" - DC / Casterlevel for classes and domains info (if that was designed) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Paul W. King (kingpaul) Date: 2006-08-24 10:22 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=277877 What, exactly, still needs to be asked of Bastion? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Martijn Verburg (karianna) Date: 2006-08-23 01:57 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=252169 Paul, looks like some PL work here... ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Andrew McDougall (tir-gwaith) Date: 2006-03-19 14:49 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=208239 I've adjusted the feats_hidden Fey trait stuff for CASTERLEVEL and DC. Removed #6 - Metal domain reference. Still a bunch of CASTERLEVEL/DC stuff - for classes, mostly. This set is going to need some clarifications, and then some good Data massaging to get all this to work. Committing what I've done so far. David, I'm going to need a PR contact to the publisher for the "Mite Fighter" feat, Domain Metal reference in the single spell, for now. Also need to get ahold of the original entry author and clarify Spell DC/Casterlevel for classes and domains objects. Along with what "Luck" is for SPELLS entry for some races. Both "Good Luck" and "Bad Luck" spells? Send the original author a ZIP of the SVN repos folder for Faeries (Trunk\pcgen\data\alpha\bastionpress\faeries) of Revision 324 or later. That should help him with some of his questions. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Eddy Anthony (eddyanthony) Date: 2005-12-08 19:49 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=886893 Response from Darkon: > 1 - BONUS:VAR with [PRELEVEL] > > # What is meant by "(TL+9)/8[PRELEVEL:3]" ? - Tir Gwaith At third level, a [insert race name here] may pick one ECL point value of Faerie Racial Traits (Including spell-like abilities). Every four levels there thereafter, a [insert race name here] can select an additional half ECL point value of traits or save them to purchase more expensive abilities later. > 2 - DC / CASTERLEVEL for various SPELLS tags These abilities are as the spell cast by a sorceror of the [insert race name here] character level. > 3 - DEITY tag in class object. I'm not sure about this > one, but listed in prettylst. > > data\alpha\bastionpress\faeries\faeries_classes.lst > (Line 6): The tag "DEITY" from "DEITY:None > (Faemancer)" is not in the CLASS tag list Domain (Su): The Faemancer, through experience and luck and the blessings of the FaerieLand, gains access to divine spells. The domain should not be one available to the faemancer from any previous classes, and can be one of the following domains: Air, Animal, Chaos, Dream, Fey, Luck, Magic, Plant, Protection, Travel or Trickery. There spells are retrieved by the fey companions the same as arcane spells are. All faemancer levels count as divine levels when casting these spells. Divine material foci are still required when listed in the spell description, but the spells are otherwise unchanged. New domains asr gained at 3rd, 6th and 9th levels. > 4 - Missing Feat "Mite Fighter" Referenced in several > PREFEAT: checks. There is an "Improved Mite Fighter" > feat (and it needs the original) Apparently the author neglected to add the Mite Fighter feat to the book. Obviously an oversite on his part and mine for not catching something like that. It most likely works like the Improved version but with only a +1 bonus since improved is +2. > 5 - Several SPELLS entries I'm not sure what is meant. > (Luck, when the spells file lists "Good Luck" and "Bad > Luck", that sort of thing) > > data\alpha\bastionpress\faeries\faeries_feats_hidden.lst > (Line 86): No SPELL entry for "SPELLS:Shrink" > data\alpha\bastionpress\faeries\faeries_races.lst > (Line 9): No SPELL entry for "SPELLS:Luck" > (Line 13): No SPELL entry for "SPELLS:Luck" > (Line 15): No SPELL entry for "SPELLS:Luck" > data\alpha\bastionpress\faeries\faeries_templates_focus.lst > (Line 44): No SPELL entry for "SPELLS:Clairaudience" > (Line 44): No SPELL entry for "SPELLS:Clairvoyance" > (Line 45): No SPELL entry for "SPELLS:Contact Outer > Plane" My version of the source no longer has a faeries_feats_hidden.list. Do you know the names of the feats making these references. That way I can look them up and see what their talking about. > 6 - Reference to a "Metal" domain, when there isn't one > in the set or the SRD. > > data\alpha\bastionpress\faeries\faeries_spells.lst > (Line 42): No DOMAIN entry for "DOMAINS:Metal" Only the Fey and Fey Roads domains are introduced in this book but it does make use of the oathbound campaign but I can't find it there either. I would suggest removing the domain entry and wait to see if someone comments on it, then we may find out where that domain was introduced. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Eddy Anthony (eddyanthony) Date: 2005-12-08 06:25 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=886893 I've got no problem with fixing these under one blanket tracker, it all get documented one way or the other. I've sent off an email to Darkon to see if he can clear any of this up. If he can great, If we can't get them all knocked out then we can open separate trackers for the remaining issus. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Andrew McDougall (tir-gwaith) Date: 2005-12-08 01:34 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=208239 File version 1.1 commit comment: [ 1048965 ] Bastion Press - Faeries New souce entered by Darkon Turas When these get fixed, it would be good to add right under the #CVS line - #Original Author: Darkon Turas ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Andrew McDougall (tir-gwaith) Date: 2005-12-08 01:32 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=208239 Section 15 lists "Darkon Turas, Eddy Anthony (MoSaT), Andrew McDougall (Tir Gwaith)." I'd say original author is Darkon Turas, even tho there isn't a comment at the top deliniating it (I can add that at the top if this is the case.) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Martijn Verburg (karianna) Date: 2005-12-08 01:20 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=252169 Hmmm normally I'd say seperate trackers, but we've had several items wrapped up like this recently on the data side, it seems most of the time data monkeys like to fix these in a batch. I'll definitely split it later if need be. Eddy, who was the author of this LST file? - K ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Andrew McDougall (tir-gwaith) Date: 2005-12-07 15:39 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=208239 Kar, Outstanding issues - separate trackers for each one? I don't own the source... Eddy might have a clue on some of these... I leave it in your capable paws. When whatever is done for the outside issues tracker-wise, this one can be closed. I'm committing the major cleanup as soon as I add myself to the COPYRIGHT and OGL.txt sections. - Tir Gwaith ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=750091&aid=1375795&group_id=25576 |
From: SourceForge.net <no...@so...> - 2008-05-19 08:04:37
|
Data Bugs item #1375795, was opened at 2005-12-07 15:35 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by amaitland You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=750091&aid=1375795&group_id=25576 Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the comment thread, including the initial issue submission, for this request, not just the latest update. Category: Missing Source Information Group: For 5.14 Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 6 Private: No Submitted By: Andrew McDougall (tir-gwaith) Assigned to: Maredudd (maredudd800) Summary: [Bastion Press] Faeries cleanup Initial Comment: Lots of Prettylst cleanup. JEP cleanup reorganized file structure to put hidden feats in separate file as standard Lots of linking cleanup - bad references Outstanding issues: 1 - BONUS:VAR with [PRELEVEL] # What is meant by "(TL+9)/8[PRELEVEL:3]" ? - Tir Gwaith # - (TL+9)/8|PRELEVEL:3 # - (TL+9)/8|!PRELEVEL:3 prettylst lines: data\alpha\bastionpress\faeries\faeries_races.lst (Line 9): Jep syntax error found near "[PRELEVEL:3]" in "BONUS:VAR|RacialTraitsECL|(TL+9)/8[PRELEVEL:3]" (Line 11): Jep syntax error found near "[PRELEVEL:3]" in "BONUS:VAR|RacialTraitsECL|(TL+9)/8[PRELEVEL:3]" (Line 12): Jep syntax error found near "[PRELEVEL:3]" in "BONUS:VAR|RacialTraitsECL|(TL+9)/8[PRELEVEL:3]" (Line 15): Jep syntax error found near "[PRELEVEL:3]" in "BONUS:VAR|RacialTraitsECL|(TL+9)/8[PRELEVEL:3]" 2 - DC / CASTERLEVEL for various SPELLS tags 3 - DEITY tag in class object. I'm not sure about this one, but listed in prettylst. data\alpha\bastionpress\faeries\faeries_classes.lst (Line 6): The tag "DEITY" from "DEITY:None (Faemancer)" is not in the CLASS tag list 4 - Missing Feat "Mite Fighter" Referenced in several PREFEAT: checks. There is an "Improved Mite Fighter" feat (and it needs the original) 5 - Several SPELLS entries I'm not sure what is meant. (Luck, when the spells file lists "Good Luck" and "Bad Luck", that sort of thing) data\alpha\bastionpress\faeries\faeries_feats_hidden.lst (Line 86): No SPELL entry for "SPELLS:Shrink" data\alpha\bastionpress\faeries\faeries_races.lst (Line 9): No SPELL entry for "SPELLS:Luck" (Line 13): No SPELL entry for "SPELLS:Luck" (Line 15): No SPELL entry for "SPELLS:Luck" data\alpha\bastionpress\faeries\faeries_templates_focus.lst (Line 44): No SPELL entry for "SPELLS:Clairaudience" (Line 44): No SPELL entry for "SPELLS:Clairvoyance" (Line 45): No SPELL entry for "SPELLS:Contact Outer Plane" 6 - Reference to a "Metal" domain, when there isn't one in the set or the SRD. data\alpha\bastionpress\faeries\faeries_spells.lst (Line 42): No DOMAIN entry for "DOMAINS:Metal" ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: LegacyKing (amaitland) Date: 2008-05-19 01:04 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1286039 Originator: NO Fixing up what I see here... Good Luck and Bad Luck are both listed in the spells.lst Entered Mite Fighter in the feat list... Improved Mite Fighter and Insight of the Fey are duplicates - removed the PREREQs from Insight of the fey and replaced with the errata listed, Base WILL Save of +2. Sent an email to Paul G. to see if he can send me a copy so I can go through the set real quick, or if he can touch it up. Outstanding issues I cannot fix with out the source: SPELLLIST for the spell casting fey classes Full info for Insight of the Fey (feat) SPells tag, I looked but unless they need a save, I think we can leave off the DC (Spell Name,<DC> most were of the harmless no save variety. I will upload/commit the fixes into the 5.14 branch. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: LegacyKing (amaitland) Date: 2008-05-17 20:24 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1286039 Originator: NO Eric, where do we stand in this file? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Paul Grosse (nylanfs) Date: 2007-12-10 17:49 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=928124 Originator: NO Found my pdf copy of Spells and Magic. Here's the Mite fighter feat. Mite Fighter [General] You are especially adept at battling creatures smaller than yourself. Prerequisites: Base Reflex Save +4, Base Attack Bonus +4 Benefit: When fighting a creature smaller than yourself, you gain a +2 bonus on your attack rolls. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Paul Grosse (nylanfs) Date: 2007-12-07 19:33 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=928124 Originator: NO Mite Fighter isn't listed anywhere in the source it is a Pre-req for Improved Mite Fighter. It's listed as being detailed in Spells and Magic. And isn't mentioned in the Sec. 15 Good luck is mentioned in the Feeorin racial abilities Luck is referenced in listed in the Bogie, Half-Fey and Sprite I would say that it is referencing the "Luck of the Fey" spell and not the Good or Bad luck spells but was changed to Luck for printing purposes, or it's a typo. The DC/Caster level for the racial info is as a sorcerer of the same character level, so it's CHA based. Insite of the Fey is listed with Base Will save at +3 but errata'd to +2 What classes abilities need the DC's? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Paul W. King (kingpaul) Date: 2007-11-21 19:14 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=277877 Originator: NO I tried to get answers on this thread in the DW forums: http://dragonwing.net/Forum/index.php?topic=35.0 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: LegacyKing (amaitland) Date: 2007-11-21 00:37 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1286039 Originator: NO Requested Eric see what he can do on the PL side... Reassigning the Tracker to him for now. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Paul W. King (kingpaul) Date: 2007-06-23 21:42 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=277877 Originator: NO Tir, I've sent an email off to Steve about your questions. I know longer get emails from SF on tracker updates, so its a bit difficult for me to follow them anymore. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Andrew McDougall (tir-gwaith) Date: 2007-05-20 08:21 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=208239 Originator: YES Errata makes me feel this set needs even more work. NOT MENTIONED - Definition of "Mite Fighter" feat, NOT MENTIONED (in a previous source?) - Definition for Metal Domain - mentioned in one spell only.. NOT MENTIONED, but the like to leave a lot to 'DM' - "Luck" spell is mentioned in several race entries. There is no definition of "Luck" spell, but "Good Luck" and "Bad Luck" NOT MENTIONED - DC / Casterlevel for classes and domains info (if that was designed) Of NOTE: Q: Why does the feat “Insight of the Fey” require a base Will save +3 at 1st level? A: This should be a base Will save of +2 at 1st level. - Current dataset has 'Insight of the Fey' with the exact same requirements as Improved Mite Fighter (line above it). Mistake in the PREreqs, possibly extending beyond this feat (is more than one feat PRExxx off by one line?) Since this still requires further clarification, I'm downgrading Priority to past 5.12. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Andrew McDougall (tir-gwaith) Date: 2007-05-20 08:20 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=208239 Originator: YES Errata makes me feel this set needs even more work. NOT MENTIONED - Definition of "Mite Fighter" feat, NOT MENTIONED (in a previous source?) - Definition for Metal Domain - mentioned in one spell only.. NOT MENTIONED, but the like to leave a lot to 'DM' - "Luck" spell is mentioned in several race entries. There is no definition of "Luck" spell, but "Good Luck" and "Bad Luck" NOT MENTIONED - DC / Casterlevel for classes and domains info (if that was designed) Of NOTE: Q: Why does the feat “Insight of the Fey” require a base Will save +3 at 1st level? A: This should be a base Will save of +2 at 1st level. - Current dataset has 'Insight of the Fey' with the exact same requirements as Improved Mite Fighter (line above it). Mistake in the PREreqs, possibly extending beyond this feat (is more than one feat PRExxx off by one line?) Since this still requires further clarification, I'm downgrading Priority to past 5.12. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Paul W. King (kingpaul) Date: 2006-10-13 21:39 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=277877 Tir, Steve Creech pointed me to the errata page: http://dragonwing.net/downloads/Faeries_errata.pdf If this doesn't help you out, let me know and I'll get back to him. Paul ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Frank Kliewe (frank_kliewe) Date: 2006-08-30 15:32 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1241568 Setting Priority to 4, since we are waiting for outside input here. -- Frank ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Andrew McDougall (tir-gwaith) Date: 2006-08-24 18:06 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=208239 As mentioned in my comment earlier: - Definition of "Mite Fighter" feat, - Definition for Metal Domain - mentioned in one spell only.. - "Luck" spell is mentioned in several race entries. There is no definition of "Luck" spell, but "Good Luck" and "Bad Luck" - DC / Casterlevel for classes and domains info (if that was designed) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Paul W. King (kingpaul) Date: 2006-08-24 10:22 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=277877 What, exactly, still needs to be asked of Bastion? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Martijn Verburg (karianna) Date: 2006-08-23 01:57 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=252169 Paul, looks like some PL work here... ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Andrew McDougall (tir-gwaith) Date: 2006-03-19 14:49 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=208239 I've adjusted the feats_hidden Fey trait stuff for CASTERLEVEL and DC. Removed #6 - Metal domain reference. Still a bunch of CASTERLEVEL/DC stuff - for classes, mostly. This set is going to need some clarifications, and then some good Data massaging to get all this to work. Committing what I've done so far. David, I'm going to need a PR contact to the publisher for the "Mite Fighter" feat, Domain Metal reference in the single spell, for now. Also need to get ahold of the original entry author and clarify Spell DC/Casterlevel for classes and domains objects. Along with what "Luck" is for SPELLS entry for some races. Both "Good Luck" and "Bad Luck" spells? Send the original author a ZIP of the SVN repos folder for Faeries (Trunk\pcgen\data\alpha\bastionpress\faeries) of Revision 324 or later. That should help him with some of his questions. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Eddy Anthony (eddyanthony) Date: 2005-12-08 19:49 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=886893 Response from Darkon: > 1 - BONUS:VAR with [PRELEVEL] > > # What is meant by "(TL+9)/8[PRELEVEL:3]" ? - Tir Gwaith At third level, a [insert race name here] may pick one ECL point value of Faerie Racial Traits (Including spell-like abilities). Every four levels there thereafter, a [insert race name here] can select an additional half ECL point value of traits or save them to purchase more expensive abilities later. > 2 - DC / CASTERLEVEL for various SPELLS tags These abilities are as the spell cast by a sorceror of the [insert race name here] character level. > 3 - DEITY tag in class object. I'm not sure about this > one, but listed in prettylst. > > data\alpha\bastionpress\faeries\faeries_classes.lst > (Line 6): The tag "DEITY" from "DEITY:None > (Faemancer)" is not in the CLASS tag list Domain (Su): The Faemancer, through experience and luck and the blessings of the FaerieLand, gains access to divine spells. The domain should not be one available to the faemancer from any previous classes, and can be one of the following domains: Air, Animal, Chaos, Dream, Fey, Luck, Magic, Plant, Protection, Travel or Trickery. There spells are retrieved by the fey companions the same as arcane spells are. All faemancer levels count as divine levels when casting these spells. Divine material foci are still required when listed in the spell description, but the spells are otherwise unchanged. New domains asr gained at 3rd, 6th and 9th levels. > 4 - Missing Feat "Mite Fighter" Referenced in several > PREFEAT: checks. There is an "Improved Mite Fighter" > feat (and it needs the original) Apparently the author neglected to add the Mite Fighter feat to the book. Obviously an oversite on his part and mine for not catching something like that. It most likely works like the Improved version but with only a +1 bonus since improved is +2. > 5 - Several SPELLS entries I'm not sure what is meant. > (Luck, when the spells file lists "Good Luck" and "Bad > Luck", that sort of thing) > > data\alpha\bastionpress\faeries\faeries_feats_hidden.lst > (Line 86): No SPELL entry for "SPELLS:Shrink" > data\alpha\bastionpress\faeries\faeries_races.lst > (Line 9): No SPELL entry for "SPELLS:Luck" > (Line 13): No SPELL entry for "SPELLS:Luck" > (Line 15): No SPELL entry for "SPELLS:Luck" > data\alpha\bastionpress\faeries\faeries_templates_focus.lst > (Line 44): No SPELL entry for "SPELLS:Clairaudience" > (Line 44): No SPELL entry for "SPELLS:Clairvoyance" > (Line 45): No SPELL entry for "SPELLS:Contact Outer > Plane" My version of the source no longer has a faeries_feats_hidden.list. Do you know the names of the feats making these references. That way I can look them up and see what their talking about. > 6 - Reference to a "Metal" domain, when there isn't one > in the set or the SRD. > > data\alpha\bastionpress\faeries\faeries_spells.lst > (Line 42): No DOMAIN entry for "DOMAINS:Metal" Only the Fey and Fey Roads domains are introduced in this book but it does make use of the oathbound campaign but I can't find it there either. I would suggest removing the domain entry and wait to see if someone comments on it, then we may find out where that domain was introduced. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Eddy Anthony (eddyanthony) Date: 2005-12-08 06:25 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=886893 I've got no problem with fixing these under one blanket tracker, it all get documented one way or the other. I've sent off an email to Darkon to see if he can clear any of this up. If he can great, If we can't get them all knocked out then we can open separate trackers for the remaining issus. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Andrew McDougall (tir-gwaith) Date: 2005-12-08 01:34 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=208239 File version 1.1 commit comment: [ 1048965 ] Bastion Press - Faeries New souce entered by Darkon Turas When these get fixed, it would be good to add right under the #CVS line - #Original Author: Darkon Turas ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Andrew McDougall (tir-gwaith) Date: 2005-12-08 01:32 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=208239 Section 15 lists "Darkon Turas, Eddy Anthony (MoSaT), Andrew McDougall (Tir Gwaith)." I'd say original author is Darkon Turas, even tho there isn't a comment at the top deliniating it (I can add that at the top if this is the case.) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Martijn Verburg (karianna) Date: 2005-12-08 01:20 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=252169 Hmmm normally I'd say seperate trackers, but we've had several items wrapped up like this recently on the data side, it seems most of the time data monkeys like to fix these in a batch. I'll definitely split it later if need be. Eddy, who was the author of this LST file? - K ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Andrew McDougall (tir-gwaith) Date: 2005-12-07 15:39 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=208239 Kar, Outstanding issues - separate trackers for each one? I don't own the source... Eddy might have a clue on some of these... I leave it in your capable paws. When whatever is done for the outside issues tracker-wise, this one can be closed. I'm committing the major cleanup as soon as I add myself to the COPYRIGHT and OGL.txt sections. - Tir Gwaith ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=750091&aid=1375795&group_id=25576 |
From: SourceForge.net <no...@so...> - 2008-06-10 01:37:59
|
Data Bugs item #1375795, was opened at 2005-12-07 18:35 Message generated for change (Settings changed) made by eddyanthony You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=750091&aid=1375795&group_id=25576 Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the comment thread, including the initial issue submission, for this request, not just the latest update. Category: Missing Source Information >Group: For 5.14.1 Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 6 Private: No Submitted By: Andrew McDougall (tir-gwaith) Assigned to: Maredudd (maredudd800) Summary: [Bastion Press] Faeries cleanup Initial Comment: Lots of Prettylst cleanup. JEP cleanup reorganized file structure to put hidden feats in separate file as standard Lots of linking cleanup - bad references Outstanding issues: 1 - BONUS:VAR with [PRELEVEL] # What is meant by "(TL+9)/8[PRELEVEL:3]" ? - Tir Gwaith # - (TL+9)/8|PRELEVEL:3 # - (TL+9)/8|!PRELEVEL:3 prettylst lines: data\alpha\bastionpress\faeries\faeries_races.lst (Line 9): Jep syntax error found near "[PRELEVEL:3]" in "BONUS:VAR|RacialTraitsECL|(TL+9)/8[PRELEVEL:3]" (Line 11): Jep syntax error found near "[PRELEVEL:3]" in "BONUS:VAR|RacialTraitsECL|(TL+9)/8[PRELEVEL:3]" (Line 12): Jep syntax error found near "[PRELEVEL:3]" in "BONUS:VAR|RacialTraitsECL|(TL+9)/8[PRELEVEL:3]" (Line 15): Jep syntax error found near "[PRELEVEL:3]" in "BONUS:VAR|RacialTraitsECL|(TL+9)/8[PRELEVEL:3]" 2 - DC / CASTERLEVEL for various SPELLS tags 3 - DEITY tag in class object. I'm not sure about this one, but listed in prettylst. data\alpha\bastionpress\faeries\faeries_classes.lst (Line 6): The tag "DEITY" from "DEITY:None (Faemancer)" is not in the CLASS tag list 4 - Missing Feat "Mite Fighter" Referenced in several PREFEAT: checks. There is an "Improved Mite Fighter" feat (and it needs the original) 5 - Several SPELLS entries I'm not sure what is meant. (Luck, when the spells file lists "Good Luck" and "Bad Luck", that sort of thing) data\alpha\bastionpress\faeries\faeries_feats_hidden.lst (Line 86): No SPELL entry for "SPELLS:Shrink" data\alpha\bastionpress\faeries\faeries_races.lst (Line 9): No SPELL entry for "SPELLS:Luck" (Line 13): No SPELL entry for "SPELLS:Luck" (Line 15): No SPELL entry for "SPELLS:Luck" data\alpha\bastionpress\faeries\faeries_templates_focus.lst (Line 44): No SPELL entry for "SPELLS:Clairaudience" (Line 44): No SPELL entry for "SPELLS:Clairvoyance" (Line 45): No SPELL entry for "SPELLS:Contact Outer Plane" 6 - Reference to a "Metal" domain, when there isn't one in the set or the SRD. data\alpha\bastionpress\faeries\faeries_spells.lst (Line 42): No DOMAIN entry for "DOMAINS:Metal" ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: LegacyKing (amaitland) Date: 2008-05-19 04:04 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1286039 Originator: NO Fixing up what I see here... Good Luck and Bad Luck are both listed in the spells.lst Entered Mite Fighter in the feat list... Improved Mite Fighter and Insight of the Fey are duplicates - removed the PREREQs from Insight of the fey and replaced with the errata listed, Base WILL Save of +2. Sent an email to Paul G. to see if he can send me a copy so I can go through the set real quick, or if he can touch it up. Outstanding issues I cannot fix with out the source: SPELLLIST for the spell casting fey classes Full info for Insight of the Fey (feat) SPells tag, I looked but unless they need a save, I think we can leave off the DC (Spell Name,<DC> most were of the harmless no save variety. I will upload/commit the fixes into the 5.14 branch. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: LegacyKing (amaitland) Date: 2008-05-17 23:24 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1286039 Originator: NO Eric, where do we stand in this file? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Paul Grosse (nylanfs) Date: 2007-12-10 20:49 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=928124 Originator: NO Found my pdf copy of Spells and Magic. Here's the Mite fighter feat. Mite Fighter [General] You are especially adept at battling creatures smaller than yourself. Prerequisites: Base Reflex Save +4, Base Attack Bonus +4 Benefit: When fighting a creature smaller than yourself, you gain a +2 bonus on your attack rolls. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Paul Grosse (nylanfs) Date: 2007-12-07 22:33 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=928124 Originator: NO Mite Fighter isn't listed anywhere in the source it is a Pre-req for Improved Mite Fighter. It's listed as being detailed in Spells and Magic. And isn't mentioned in the Sec. 15 Good luck is mentioned in the Feeorin racial abilities Luck is referenced in listed in the Bogie, Half-Fey and Sprite I would say that it is referencing the "Luck of the Fey" spell and not the Good or Bad luck spells but was changed to Luck for printing purposes, or it's a typo. The DC/Caster level for the racial info is as a sorcerer of the same character level, so it's CHA based. Insite of the Fey is listed with Base Will save at +3 but errata'd to +2 What classes abilities need the DC's? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Paul W. King (kingpaul) Date: 2007-11-21 22:14 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=277877 Originator: NO I tried to get answers on this thread in the DW forums: http://dragonwing.net/Forum/index.php?topic=35.0 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: LegacyKing (amaitland) Date: 2007-11-21 03:37 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1286039 Originator: NO Requested Eric see what he can do on the PL side... Reassigning the Tracker to him for now. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Paul W. King (kingpaul) Date: 2007-06-24 00:42 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=277877 Originator: NO Tir, I've sent an email off to Steve about your questions. I know longer get emails from SF on tracker updates, so its a bit difficult for me to follow them anymore. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Andrew McDougall (tir-gwaith) Date: 2007-05-20 11:21 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=208239 Originator: YES Errata makes me feel this set needs even more work. NOT MENTIONED - Definition of "Mite Fighter" feat, NOT MENTIONED (in a previous source?) - Definition for Metal Domain - mentioned in one spell only.. NOT MENTIONED, but the like to leave a lot to 'DM' - "Luck" spell is mentioned in several race entries. There is no definition of "Luck" spell, but "Good Luck" and "Bad Luck" NOT MENTIONED - DC / Casterlevel for classes and domains info (if that was designed) Of NOTE: Q: Why does the feat “Insight of the Fey” require a base Will save +3 at 1st level? A: This should be a base Will save of +2 at 1st level. - Current dataset has 'Insight of the Fey' with the exact same requirements as Improved Mite Fighter (line above it). Mistake in the PREreqs, possibly extending beyond this feat (is more than one feat PRExxx off by one line?) Since this still requires further clarification, I'm downgrading Priority to past 5.12. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Andrew McDougall (tir-gwaith) Date: 2007-05-20 11:20 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=208239 Originator: YES Errata makes me feel this set needs even more work. NOT MENTIONED - Definition of "Mite Fighter" feat, NOT MENTIONED (in a previous source?) - Definition for Metal Domain - mentioned in one spell only.. NOT MENTIONED, but the like to leave a lot to 'DM' - "Luck" spell is mentioned in several race entries. There is no definition of "Luck" spell, but "Good Luck" and "Bad Luck" NOT MENTIONED - DC / Casterlevel for classes and domains info (if that was designed) Of NOTE: Q: Why does the feat “Insight of the Fey” require a base Will save +3 at 1st level? A: This should be a base Will save of +2 at 1st level. - Current dataset has 'Insight of the Fey' with the exact same requirements as Improved Mite Fighter (line above it). Mistake in the PREreqs, possibly extending beyond this feat (is more than one feat PRExxx off by one line?) Since this still requires further clarification, I'm downgrading Priority to past 5.12. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Paul W. King (kingpaul) Date: 2006-10-14 00:39 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=277877 Tir, Steve Creech pointed me to the errata page: http://dragonwing.net/downloads/Faeries_errata.pdf If this doesn't help you out, let me know and I'll get back to him. Paul ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Frank Kliewe (frank_kliewe) Date: 2006-08-30 18:32 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1241568 Setting Priority to 4, since we are waiting for outside input here. -- Frank ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Andrew McDougall (tir-gwaith) Date: 2006-08-24 21:06 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=208239 As mentioned in my comment earlier: - Definition of "Mite Fighter" feat, - Definition for Metal Domain - mentioned in one spell only.. - "Luck" spell is mentioned in several race entries. There is no definition of "Luck" spell, but "Good Luck" and "Bad Luck" - DC / Casterlevel for classes and domains info (if that was designed) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Paul W. King (kingpaul) Date: 2006-08-24 13:22 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=277877 What, exactly, still needs to be asked of Bastion? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Martijn Verburg (karianna) Date: 2006-08-23 04:57 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=252169 Paul, looks like some PL work here... ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Andrew McDougall (tir-gwaith) Date: 2006-03-19 17:49 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=208239 I've adjusted the feats_hidden Fey trait stuff for CASTERLEVEL and DC. Removed #6 - Metal domain reference. Still a bunch of CASTERLEVEL/DC stuff - for classes, mostly. This set is going to need some clarifications, and then some good Data massaging to get all this to work. Committing what I've done so far. David, I'm going to need a PR contact to the publisher for the "Mite Fighter" feat, Domain Metal reference in the single spell, for now. Also need to get ahold of the original entry author and clarify Spell DC/Casterlevel for classes and domains objects. Along with what "Luck" is for SPELLS entry for some races. Both "Good Luck" and "Bad Luck" spells? Send the original author a ZIP of the SVN repos folder for Faeries (Trunk\pcgen\data\alpha\bastionpress\faeries) of Revision 324 or later. That should help him with some of his questions. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Eddy Anthony (eddyanthony) Date: 2005-12-08 22:49 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=886893 Response from Darkon: > 1 - BONUS:VAR with [PRELEVEL] > > # What is meant by "(TL+9)/8[PRELEVEL:3]" ? - Tir Gwaith At third level, a [insert race name here] may pick one ECL point value of Faerie Racial Traits (Including spell-like abilities). Every four levels there thereafter, a [insert race name here] can select an additional half ECL point value of traits or save them to purchase more expensive abilities later. > 2 - DC / CASTERLEVEL for various SPELLS tags These abilities are as the spell cast by a sorceror of the [insert race name here] character level. > 3 - DEITY tag in class object. I'm not sure about this > one, but listed in prettylst. > > data\alpha\bastionpress\faeries\faeries_classes.lst > (Line 6): The tag "DEITY" from "DEITY:None > (Faemancer)" is not in the CLASS tag list Domain (Su): The Faemancer, through experience and luck and the blessings of the FaerieLand, gains access to divine spells. The domain should not be one available to the faemancer from any previous classes, and can be one of the following domains: Air, Animal, Chaos, Dream, Fey, Luck, Magic, Plant, Protection, Travel or Trickery. There spells are retrieved by the fey companions the same as arcane spells are. All faemancer levels count as divine levels when casting these spells. Divine material foci are still required when listed in the spell description, but the spells are otherwise unchanged. New domains asr gained at 3rd, 6th and 9th levels. > 4 - Missing Feat "Mite Fighter" Referenced in several > PREFEAT: checks. There is an "Improved Mite Fighter" > feat (and it needs the original) Apparently the author neglected to add the Mite Fighter feat to the book. Obviously an oversite on his part and mine for not catching something like that. It most likely works like the Improved version but with only a +1 bonus since improved is +2. > 5 - Several SPELLS entries I'm not sure what is meant. > (Luck, when the spells file lists "Good Luck" and "Bad > Luck", that sort of thing) > > data\alpha\bastionpress\faeries\faeries_feats_hidden.lst > (Line 86): No SPELL entry for "SPELLS:Shrink" > data\alpha\bastionpress\faeries\faeries_races.lst > (Line 9): No SPELL entry for "SPELLS:Luck" > (Line 13): No SPELL entry for "SPELLS:Luck" > (Line 15): No SPELL entry for "SPELLS:Luck" > data\alpha\bastionpress\faeries\faeries_templates_focus.lst > (Line 44): No SPELL entry for "SPELLS:Clairaudience" > (Line 44): No SPELL entry for "SPELLS:Clairvoyance" > (Line 45): No SPELL entry for "SPELLS:Contact Outer > Plane" My version of the source no longer has a faeries_feats_hidden.list. Do you know the names of the feats making these references. That way I can look them up and see what their talking about. > 6 - Reference to a "Metal" domain, when there isn't one > in the set or the SRD. > > data\alpha\bastionpress\faeries\faeries_spells.lst > (Line 42): No DOMAIN entry for "DOMAINS:Metal" Only the Fey and Fey Roads domains are introduced in this book but it does make use of the oathbound campaign but I can't find it there either. I would suggest removing the domain entry and wait to see if someone comments on it, then we may find out where that domain was introduced. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Eddy Anthony (eddyanthony) Date: 2005-12-08 09:25 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=886893 I've got no problem with fixing these under one blanket tracker, it all get documented one way or the other. I've sent off an email to Darkon to see if he can clear any of this up. If he can great, If we can't get them all knocked out then we can open separate trackers for the remaining issus. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Andrew McDougall (tir-gwaith) Date: 2005-12-08 04:34 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=208239 File version 1.1 commit comment: [ 1048965 ] Bastion Press - Faeries New souce entered by Darkon Turas When these get fixed, it would be good to add right under the #CVS line - #Original Author: Darkon Turas ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Andrew McDougall (tir-gwaith) Date: 2005-12-08 04:32 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=208239 Section 15 lists "Darkon Turas, Eddy Anthony (MoSaT), Andrew McDougall (Tir Gwaith)." I'd say original author is Darkon Turas, even tho there isn't a comment at the top deliniating it (I can add that at the top if this is the case.) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Martijn Verburg (karianna) Date: 2005-12-08 04:20 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=252169 Hmmm normally I'd say seperate trackers, but we've had several items wrapped up like this recently on the data side, it seems most of the time data monkeys like to fix these in a batch. I'll definitely split it later if need be. Eddy, who was the author of this LST file? - K ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Andrew McDougall (tir-gwaith) Date: 2005-12-07 18:39 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=208239 Kar, Outstanding issues - separate trackers for each one? I don't own the source... Eddy might have a clue on some of these... I leave it in your capable paws. When whatever is done for the outside issues tracker-wise, this one can be closed. I'm committing the major cleanup as soon as I add myself to the COPYRIGHT and OGL.txt sections. - Tir Gwaith ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=750091&aid=1375795&group_id=25576 |
From: SourceForge.net <no...@so...> - 2008-07-15 11:12:34
|
Data Bugs item #1375795, was opened at 2005-12-07 18:35 Message generated for change (Settings changed) made by maredudd800 You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=750091&aid=1375795&group_id=25576 Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the comment thread, including the initial issue submission, for this request, not just the latest update. Category: Missing Source Information >Group: For 5.16.0 Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 6 Private: No Submitted By: Andrew McDougall (tir-gwaith) Assigned to: Maredudd (maredudd800) Summary: [Bastion Press] Faeries cleanup Initial Comment: Lots of Prettylst cleanup. JEP cleanup reorganized file structure to put hidden feats in separate file as standard Lots of linking cleanup - bad references Outstanding issues: 1 - BONUS:VAR with [PRELEVEL] # What is meant by "(TL+9)/8[PRELEVEL:3]" ? - Tir Gwaith # - (TL+9)/8|PRELEVEL:3 # - (TL+9)/8|!PRELEVEL:3 prettylst lines: data\alpha\bastionpress\faeries\faeries_races.lst (Line 9): Jep syntax error found near "[PRELEVEL:3]" in "BONUS:VAR|RacialTraitsECL|(TL+9)/8[PRELEVEL:3]" (Line 11): Jep syntax error found near "[PRELEVEL:3]" in "BONUS:VAR|RacialTraitsECL|(TL+9)/8[PRELEVEL:3]" (Line 12): Jep syntax error found near "[PRELEVEL:3]" in "BONUS:VAR|RacialTraitsECL|(TL+9)/8[PRELEVEL:3]" (Line 15): Jep syntax error found near "[PRELEVEL:3]" in "BONUS:VAR|RacialTraitsECL|(TL+9)/8[PRELEVEL:3]" 2 - DC / CASTERLEVEL for various SPELLS tags 3 - DEITY tag in class object. I'm not sure about this one, but listed in prettylst. data\alpha\bastionpress\faeries\faeries_classes.lst (Line 6): The tag "DEITY" from "DEITY:None (Faemancer)" is not in the CLASS tag list 4 - Missing Feat "Mite Fighter" Referenced in several PREFEAT: checks. There is an "Improved Mite Fighter" feat (and it needs the original) 5 - Several SPELLS entries I'm not sure what is meant. (Luck, when the spells file lists "Good Luck" and "Bad Luck", that sort of thing) data\alpha\bastionpress\faeries\faeries_feats_hidden.lst (Line 86): No SPELL entry for "SPELLS:Shrink" data\alpha\bastionpress\faeries\faeries_races.lst (Line 9): No SPELL entry for "SPELLS:Luck" (Line 13): No SPELL entry for "SPELLS:Luck" (Line 15): No SPELL entry for "SPELLS:Luck" data\alpha\bastionpress\faeries\faeries_templates_focus.lst (Line 44): No SPELL entry for "SPELLS:Clairaudience" (Line 44): No SPELL entry for "SPELLS:Clairvoyance" (Line 45): No SPELL entry for "SPELLS:Contact Outer Plane" 6 - Reference to a "Metal" domain, when there isn't one in the set or the SRD. data\alpha\bastionpress\faeries\faeries_spells.lst (Line 42): No DOMAIN entry for "DOMAINS:Metal" ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: LegacyKing (amaitland) Date: 2008-05-19 04:04 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1286039 Originator: NO Fixing up what I see here... Good Luck and Bad Luck are both listed in the spells.lst Entered Mite Fighter in the feat list... Improved Mite Fighter and Insight of the Fey are duplicates - removed the PREREQs from Insight of the fey and replaced with the errata listed, Base WILL Save of +2. Sent an email to Paul G. to see if he can send me a copy so I can go through the set real quick, or if he can touch it up. Outstanding issues I cannot fix with out the source: SPELLLIST for the spell casting fey classes Full info for Insight of the Fey (feat) SPells tag, I looked but unless they need a save, I think we can leave off the DC (Spell Name,<DC> most were of the harmless no save variety. I will upload/commit the fixes into the 5.14 branch. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: LegacyKing (amaitland) Date: 2008-05-17 23:24 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1286039 Originator: NO Eric, where do we stand in this file? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Paul Grosse (nylanfs) Date: 2007-12-10 20:49 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=928124 Originator: NO Found my pdf copy of Spells and Magic. Here's the Mite fighter feat. Mite Fighter [General] You are especially adept at battling creatures smaller than yourself. Prerequisites: Base Reflex Save +4, Base Attack Bonus +4 Benefit: When fighting a creature smaller than yourself, you gain a +2 bonus on your attack rolls. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Paul Grosse (nylanfs) Date: 2007-12-07 22:33 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=928124 Originator: NO Mite Fighter isn't listed anywhere in the source it is a Pre-req for Improved Mite Fighter. It's listed as being detailed in Spells and Magic. And isn't mentioned in the Sec. 15 Good luck is mentioned in the Feeorin racial abilities Luck is referenced in listed in the Bogie, Half-Fey and Sprite I would say that it is referencing the "Luck of the Fey" spell and not the Good or Bad luck spells but was changed to Luck for printing purposes, or it's a typo. The DC/Caster level for the racial info is as a sorcerer of the same character level, so it's CHA based. Insite of the Fey is listed with Base Will save at +3 but errata'd to +2 What classes abilities need the DC's? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Paul W. King (kingpaul) Date: 2007-11-21 22:14 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=277877 Originator: NO I tried to get answers on this thread in the DW forums: http://dragonwing.net/Forum/index.php?topic=35.0 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: LegacyKing (amaitland) Date: 2007-11-21 03:37 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1286039 Originator: NO Requested Eric see what he can do on the PL side... Reassigning the Tracker to him for now. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Paul W. King (kingpaul) Date: 2007-06-24 00:42 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=277877 Originator: NO Tir, I've sent an email off to Steve about your questions. I know longer get emails from SF on tracker updates, so its a bit difficult for me to follow them anymore. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Andrew McDougall (tir-gwaith) Date: 2007-05-20 11:21 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=208239 Originator: YES Errata makes me feel this set needs even more work. NOT MENTIONED - Definition of "Mite Fighter" feat, NOT MENTIONED (in a previous source?) - Definition for Metal Domain - mentioned in one spell only.. NOT MENTIONED, but the like to leave a lot to 'DM' - "Luck" spell is mentioned in several race entries. There is no definition of "Luck" spell, but "Good Luck" and "Bad Luck" NOT MENTIONED - DC / Casterlevel for classes and domains info (if that was designed) Of NOTE: Q: Why does the feat Insight of the Fey require a base Will save +3 at 1st level? A: This should be a base Will save of +2 at 1st level. - Current dataset has 'Insight of the Fey' with the exact same requirements as Improved Mite Fighter (line above it). Mistake in the PREreqs, possibly extending beyond this feat (is more than one feat PRExxx off by one line?) Since this still requires further clarification, I'm downgrading Priority to past 5.12. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Andrew McDougall (tir-gwaith) Date: 2007-05-20 11:20 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=208239 Originator: YES Errata makes me feel this set needs even more work. NOT MENTIONED - Definition of "Mite Fighter" feat, NOT MENTIONED (in a previous source?) - Definition for Metal Domain - mentioned in one spell only.. NOT MENTIONED, but the like to leave a lot to 'DM' - "Luck" spell is mentioned in several race entries. There is no definition of "Luck" spell, but "Good Luck" and "Bad Luck" NOT MENTIONED - DC / Casterlevel for classes and domains info (if that was designed) Of NOTE: Q: Why does the feat Insight of the Fey require a base Will save +3 at 1st level? A: This should be a base Will save of +2 at 1st level. - Current dataset has 'Insight of the Fey' with the exact same requirements as Improved Mite Fighter (line above it). Mistake in the PREreqs, possibly extending beyond this feat (is more than one feat PRExxx off by one line?) Since this still requires further clarification, I'm downgrading Priority to past 5.12. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Paul W. King (kingpaul) Date: 2006-10-14 00:39 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=277877 Tir, Steve Creech pointed me to the errata page: http://dragonwing.net/downloads/Faeries_errata.pdf If this doesn't help you out, let me know and I'll get back to him. Paul ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Frank Kliewe (frank_kliewe) Date: 2006-08-30 18:32 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1241568 Setting Priority to 4, since we are waiting for outside input here. -- Frank ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Andrew McDougall (tir-gwaith) Date: 2006-08-24 21:06 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=208239 As mentioned in my comment earlier: - Definition of "Mite Fighter" feat, - Definition for Metal Domain - mentioned in one spell only.. - "Luck" spell is mentioned in several race entries. There is no definition of "Luck" spell, but "Good Luck" and "Bad Luck" - DC / Casterlevel for classes and domains info (if that was designed) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Paul W. King (kingpaul) Date: 2006-08-24 13:22 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=277877 What, exactly, still needs to be asked of Bastion? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Martijn Verburg (karianna) Date: 2006-08-23 04:57 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=252169 Paul, looks like some PL work here... ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Andrew McDougall (tir-gwaith) Date: 2006-03-19 17:49 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=208239 I've adjusted the feats_hidden Fey trait stuff for CASTERLEVEL and DC. Removed #6 - Metal domain reference. Still a bunch of CASTERLEVEL/DC stuff - for classes, mostly. This set is going to need some clarifications, and then some good Data massaging to get all this to work. Committing what I've done so far. David, I'm going to need a PR contact to the publisher for the "Mite Fighter" feat, Domain Metal reference in the single spell, for now. Also need to get ahold of the original entry author and clarify Spell DC/Casterlevel for classes and domains objects. Along with what "Luck" is for SPELLS entry for some races. Both "Good Luck" and "Bad Luck" spells? Send the original author a ZIP of the SVN repos folder for Faeries (Trunk\pcgen\data\alpha\bastionpress\faeries) of Revision 324 or later. That should help him with some of his questions. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Eddy Anthony (eddyanthony) Date: 2005-12-08 22:49 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=886893 Response from Darkon: > 1 - BONUS:VAR with [PRELEVEL] > > # What is meant by "(TL+9)/8[PRELEVEL:3]" ? - Tir Gwaith At third level, a [insert race name here] may pick one ECL point value of Faerie Racial Traits (Including spell-like abilities). Every four levels there thereafter, a [insert race name here] can select an additional half ECL point value of traits or save them to purchase more expensive abilities later. > 2 - DC / CASTERLEVEL for various SPELLS tags These abilities are as the spell cast by a sorceror of the [insert race name here] character level. > 3 - DEITY tag in class object. I'm not sure about this > one, but listed in prettylst. > > data\alpha\bastionpress\faeries\faeries_classes.lst > (Line 6): The tag "DEITY" from "DEITY:None > (Faemancer)" is not in the CLASS tag list Domain (Su): The Faemancer, through experience and luck and the blessings of the FaerieLand, gains access to divine spells. The domain should not be one available to the faemancer from any previous classes, and can be one of the following domains: Air, Animal, Chaos, Dream, Fey, Luck, Magic, Plant, Protection, Travel or Trickery. There spells are retrieved by the fey companions the same as arcane spells are. All faemancer levels count as divine levels when casting these spells. Divine material foci are still required when listed in the spell description, but the spells are otherwise unchanged. New domains asr gained at 3rd, 6th and 9th levels. > 4 - Missing Feat "Mite Fighter" Referenced in several > PREFEAT: checks. There is an "Improved Mite Fighter" > feat (and it needs the original) Apparently the author neglected to add the Mite Fighter feat to the book. Obviously an oversite on his part and mine for not catching something like that. It most likely works like the Improved version but with only a +1 bonus since improved is +2. > 5 - Several SPELLS entries I'm not sure what is meant. > (Luck, when the spells file lists "Good Luck" and "Bad > Luck", that sort of thing) > > data\alpha\bastionpress\faeries\faeries_feats_hidden.lst > (Line 86): No SPELL entry for "SPELLS:Shrink" > data\alpha\bastionpress\faeries\faeries_races.lst > (Line 9): No SPELL entry for "SPELLS:Luck" > (Line 13): No SPELL entry for "SPELLS:Luck" > (Line 15): No SPELL entry for "SPELLS:Luck" > data\alpha\bastionpress\faeries\faeries_templates_focus.lst > (Line 44): No SPELL entry for "SPELLS:Clairaudience" > (Line 44): No SPELL entry for "SPELLS:Clairvoyance" > (Line 45): No SPELL entry for "SPELLS:Contact Outer > Plane" My version of the source no longer has a faeries_feats_hidden.list. Do you know the names of the feats making these references. That way I can look them up and see what their talking about. > 6 - Reference to a "Metal" domain, when there isn't one > in the set or the SRD. > > data\alpha\bastionpress\faeries\faeries_spells.lst > (Line 42): No DOMAIN entry for "DOMAINS:Metal" Only the Fey and Fey Roads domains are introduced in this book but it does make use of the oathbound campaign but I can't find it there either. I would suggest removing the domain entry and wait to see if someone comments on it, then we may find out where that domain was introduced. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Eddy Anthony (eddyanthony) Date: 2005-12-08 09:25 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=886893 I've got no problem with fixing these under one blanket tracker, it all get documented one way or the other. I've sent off an email to Darkon to see if he can clear any of this up. If he can great, If we can't get them all knocked out then we can open separate trackers for the remaining issus. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Andrew McDougall (tir-gwaith) Date: 2005-12-08 04:34 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=208239 File version 1.1 commit comment: [ 1048965 ] Bastion Press - Faeries New souce entered by Darkon Turas When these get fixed, it would be good to add right under the #CVS line - #Original Author: Darkon Turas ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Andrew McDougall (tir-gwaith) Date: 2005-12-08 04:32 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=208239 Section 15 lists "Darkon Turas, Eddy Anthony (MoSaT), Andrew McDougall (Tir Gwaith)." I'd say original author is Darkon Turas, even tho there isn't a comment at the top deliniating it (I can add that at the top if this is the case.) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Martijn Verburg (karianna) Date: 2005-12-08 04:20 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=252169 Hmmm normally I'd say seperate trackers, but we've had several items wrapped up like this recently on the data side, it seems most of the time data monkeys like to fix these in a batch. I'll definitely split it later if need be. Eddy, who was the author of this LST file? - K ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Andrew McDougall (tir-gwaith) Date: 2005-12-07 18:39 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=208239 Kar, Outstanding issues - separate trackers for each one? I don't own the source... Eddy might have a clue on some of these... I leave it in your capable paws. When whatever is done for the outside issues tracker-wise, this one can be closed. I'm committing the major cleanup as soon as I add myself to the COPYRIGHT and OGL.txt sections. - Tir Gwaith ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=750091&aid=1375795&group_id=25576 |
From: SourceForge.net <no...@so...> - 2008-09-04 20:15:34
|
Data Bugs item #1375795, was opened at 2005-12-07 15:35 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by amaitland You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=750091&aid=1375795&group_id=25576 Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the comment thread, including the initial issue submission, for this request, not just the latest update. Category: Missing Source Information Group: For 5.16.0 Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 6 Private: No Submitted By: Andrew McDougall (tir-gwaith) >Assigned to: LegacyKing (amaitland) Summary: [Bastion Press] Faeries cleanup Initial Comment: Lots of Prettylst cleanup. JEP cleanup reorganized file structure to put hidden feats in separate file as standard Lots of linking cleanup - bad references Outstanding issues: 1 - BONUS:VAR with [PRELEVEL] # What is meant by "(TL+9)/8[PRELEVEL:3]" ? - Tir Gwaith # - (TL+9)/8|PRELEVEL:3 # - (TL+9)/8|!PRELEVEL:3 prettylst lines: data\alpha\bastionpress\faeries\faeries_races.lst (Line 9): Jep syntax error found near "[PRELEVEL:3]" in "BONUS:VAR|RacialTraitsECL|(TL+9)/8[PRELEVEL:3]" (Line 11): Jep syntax error found near "[PRELEVEL:3]" in "BONUS:VAR|RacialTraitsECL|(TL+9)/8[PRELEVEL:3]" (Line 12): Jep syntax error found near "[PRELEVEL:3]" in "BONUS:VAR|RacialTraitsECL|(TL+9)/8[PRELEVEL:3]" (Line 15): Jep syntax error found near "[PRELEVEL:3]" in "BONUS:VAR|RacialTraitsECL|(TL+9)/8[PRELEVEL:3]" 2 - DC / CASTERLEVEL for various SPELLS tags 3 - DEITY tag in class object. I'm not sure about this one, but listed in prettylst. data\alpha\bastionpress\faeries\faeries_classes.lst (Line 6): The tag "DEITY" from "DEITY:None (Faemancer)" is not in the CLASS tag list 4 - Missing Feat "Mite Fighter" Referenced in several PREFEAT: checks. There is an "Improved Mite Fighter" feat (and it needs the original) 5 - Several SPELLS entries I'm not sure what is meant. (Luck, when the spells file lists "Good Luck" and "Bad Luck", that sort of thing) data\alpha\bastionpress\faeries\faeries_feats_hidden.lst (Line 86): No SPELL entry for "SPELLS:Shrink" data\alpha\bastionpress\faeries\faeries_races.lst (Line 9): No SPELL entry for "SPELLS:Luck" (Line 13): No SPELL entry for "SPELLS:Luck" (Line 15): No SPELL entry for "SPELLS:Luck" data\alpha\bastionpress\faeries\faeries_templates_focus.lst (Line 44): No SPELL entry for "SPELLS:Clairaudience" (Line 44): No SPELL entry for "SPELLS:Clairvoyance" (Line 45): No SPELL entry for "SPELLS:Contact Outer Plane" 6 - Reference to a "Metal" domain, when there isn't one in the set or the SRD. data\alpha\bastionpress\faeries\faeries_spells.lst (Line 42): No DOMAIN entry for "DOMAINS:Metal" ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: LegacyKing (amaitland) Date: 2008-09-04 13:15 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1286039 Originator: NO Obtained a copy of the book... will review and fix the set to current standards. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: LegacyKing (amaitland) Date: 2008-05-19 01:04 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1286039 Originator: NO Fixing up what I see here... Good Luck and Bad Luck are both listed in the spells.lst Entered Mite Fighter in the feat list... Improved Mite Fighter and Insight of the Fey are duplicates - removed the PREREQs from Insight of the fey and replaced with the errata listed, Base WILL Save of +2. Sent an email to Paul G. to see if he can send me a copy so I can go through the set real quick, or if he can touch it up. Outstanding issues I cannot fix with out the source: SPELLLIST for the spell casting fey classes Full info for Insight of the Fey (feat) SPells tag, I looked but unless they need a save, I think we can leave off the DC (Spell Name,<DC> most were of the harmless no save variety. I will upload/commit the fixes into the 5.14 branch. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: LegacyKing (amaitland) Date: 2008-05-17 20:24 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1286039 Originator: NO Eric, where do we stand in this file? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Paul Grosse (nylanfs) Date: 2007-12-10 17:49 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=928124 Originator: NO Found my pdf copy of Spells and Magic. Here's the Mite fighter feat. Mite Fighter [General] You are especially adept at battling creatures smaller than yourself. Prerequisites: Base Reflex Save +4, Base Attack Bonus +4 Benefit: When fighting a creature smaller than yourself, you gain a +2 bonus on your attack rolls. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Paul Grosse (nylanfs) Date: 2007-12-07 19:33 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=928124 Originator: NO Mite Fighter isn't listed anywhere in the source it is a Pre-req for Improved Mite Fighter. It's listed as being detailed in Spells and Magic. And isn't mentioned in the Sec. 15 Good luck is mentioned in the Feeorin racial abilities Luck is referenced in listed in the Bogie, Half-Fey and Sprite I would say that it is referencing the "Luck of the Fey" spell and not the Good or Bad luck spells but was changed to Luck for printing purposes, or it's a typo. The DC/Caster level for the racial info is as a sorcerer of the same character level, so it's CHA based. Insite of the Fey is listed with Base Will save at +3 but errata'd to +2 What classes abilities need the DC's? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Paul W. King (kingpaul) Date: 2007-11-21 19:14 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=277877 Originator: NO I tried to get answers on this thread in the DW forums: http://dragonwing.net/Forum/index.php?topic=35.0 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: LegacyKing (amaitland) Date: 2007-11-21 00:37 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1286039 Originator: NO Requested Eric see what he can do on the PL side... Reassigning the Tracker to him for now. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Paul W. King (kingpaul) Date: 2007-06-23 21:42 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=277877 Originator: NO Tir, I've sent an email off to Steve about your questions. I know longer get emails from SF on tracker updates, so its a bit difficult for me to follow them anymore. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Andrew McDougall (tir-gwaith) Date: 2007-05-20 08:21 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=208239 Originator: YES Errata makes me feel this set needs even more work. NOT MENTIONED - Definition of "Mite Fighter" feat, NOT MENTIONED (in a previous source?) - Definition for Metal Domain - mentioned in one spell only.. NOT MENTIONED, but the like to leave a lot to 'DM' - "Luck" spell is mentioned in several race entries. There is no definition of "Luck" spell, but "Good Luck" and "Bad Luck" NOT MENTIONED - DC / Casterlevel for classes and domains info (if that was designed) Of NOTE: Q: Why does the feat Insight of the Fey require a base Will save +3 at 1st level? A: This should be a base Will save of +2 at 1st level. - Current dataset has 'Insight of the Fey' with the exact same requirements as Improved Mite Fighter (line above it). Mistake in the PREreqs, possibly extending beyond this feat (is more than one feat PRExxx off by one line?) Since this still requires further clarification, I'm downgrading Priority to past 5.12. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Andrew McDougall (tir-gwaith) Date: 2007-05-20 08:20 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=208239 Originator: YES Errata makes me feel this set needs even more work. NOT MENTIONED - Definition of "Mite Fighter" feat, NOT MENTIONED (in a previous source?) - Definition for Metal Domain - mentioned in one spell only.. NOT MENTIONED, but the like to leave a lot to 'DM' - "Luck" spell is mentioned in several race entries. There is no definition of "Luck" spell, but "Good Luck" and "Bad Luck" NOT MENTIONED - DC / Casterlevel for classes and domains info (if that was designed) Of NOTE: Q: Why does the feat Insight of the Fey require a base Will save +3 at 1st level? A: This should be a base Will save of +2 at 1st level. - Current dataset has 'Insight of the Fey' with the exact same requirements as Improved Mite Fighter (line above it). Mistake in the PREreqs, possibly extending beyond this feat (is more than one feat PRExxx off by one line?) Since this still requires further clarification, I'm downgrading Priority to past 5.12. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Paul W. King (kingpaul) Date: 2006-10-13 21:39 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=277877 Tir, Steve Creech pointed me to the errata page: http://dragonwing.net/downloads/Faeries_errata.pdf If this doesn't help you out, let me know and I'll get back to him. Paul ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Frank Kliewe (frank_kliewe) Date: 2006-08-30 15:32 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1241568 Setting Priority to 4, since we are waiting for outside input here. -- Frank ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Andrew McDougall (tir-gwaith) Date: 2006-08-24 18:06 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=208239 As mentioned in my comment earlier: - Definition of "Mite Fighter" feat, - Definition for Metal Domain - mentioned in one spell only.. - "Luck" spell is mentioned in several race entries. There is no definition of "Luck" spell, but "Good Luck" and "Bad Luck" - DC / Casterlevel for classes and domains info (if that was designed) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Paul W. King (kingpaul) Date: 2006-08-24 10:22 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=277877 What, exactly, still needs to be asked of Bastion? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Martijn Verburg (karianna) Date: 2006-08-23 01:57 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=252169 Paul, looks like some PL work here... ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Andrew McDougall (tir-gwaith) Date: 2006-03-19 14:49 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=208239 I've adjusted the feats_hidden Fey trait stuff for CASTERLEVEL and DC. Removed #6 - Metal domain reference. Still a bunch of CASTERLEVEL/DC stuff - for classes, mostly. This set is going to need some clarifications, and then some good Data massaging to get all this to work. Committing what I've done so far. David, I'm going to need a PR contact to the publisher for the "Mite Fighter" feat, Domain Metal reference in the single spell, for now. Also need to get ahold of the original entry author and clarify Spell DC/Casterlevel for classes and domains objects. Along with what "Luck" is for SPELLS entry for some races. Both "Good Luck" and "Bad Luck" spells? Send the original author a ZIP of the SVN repos folder for Faeries (Trunk\pcgen\data\alpha\bastionpress\faeries) of Revision 324 or later. That should help him with some of his questions. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Eddy Anthony (eddyanthony) Date: 2005-12-08 19:49 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=886893 Response from Darkon: > 1 - BONUS:VAR with [PRELEVEL] > > # What is meant by "(TL+9)/8[PRELEVEL:3]" ? - Tir Gwaith At third level, a [insert race name here] may pick one ECL point value of Faerie Racial Traits (Including spell-like abilities). Every four levels there thereafter, a [insert race name here] can select an additional half ECL point value of traits or save them to purchase more expensive abilities later. > 2 - DC / CASTERLEVEL for various SPELLS tags These abilities are as the spell cast by a sorceror of the [insert race name here] character level. > 3 - DEITY tag in class object. I'm not sure about this > one, but listed in prettylst. > > data\alpha\bastionpress\faeries\faeries_classes.lst > (Line 6): The tag "DEITY" from "DEITY:None > (Faemancer)" is not in the CLASS tag list Domain (Su): The Faemancer, through experience and luck and the blessings of the FaerieLand, gains access to divine spells. The domain should not be one available to the faemancer from any previous classes, and can be one of the following domains: Air, Animal, Chaos, Dream, Fey, Luck, Magic, Plant, Protection, Travel or Trickery. There spells are retrieved by the fey companions the same as arcane spells are. All faemancer levels count as divine levels when casting these spells. Divine material foci are still required when listed in the spell description, but the spells are otherwise unchanged. New domains asr gained at 3rd, 6th and 9th levels. > 4 - Missing Feat "Mite Fighter" Referenced in several > PREFEAT: checks. There is an "Improved Mite Fighter" > feat (and it needs the original) Apparently the author neglected to add the Mite Fighter feat to the book. Obviously an oversite on his part and mine for not catching something like that. It most likely works like the Improved version but with only a +1 bonus since improved is +2. > 5 - Several SPELLS entries I'm not sure what is meant. > (Luck, when the spells file lists "Good Luck" and "Bad > Luck", that sort of thing) > > data\alpha\bastionpress\faeries\faeries_feats_hidden.lst > (Line 86): No SPELL entry for "SPELLS:Shrink" > data\alpha\bastionpress\faeries\faeries_races.lst > (Line 9): No SPELL entry for "SPELLS:Luck" > (Line 13): No SPELL entry for "SPELLS:Luck" > (Line 15): No SPELL entry for "SPELLS:Luck" > data\alpha\bastionpress\faeries\faeries_templates_focus.lst > (Line 44): No SPELL entry for "SPELLS:Clairaudience" > (Line 44): No SPELL entry for "SPELLS:Clairvoyance" > (Line 45): No SPELL entry for "SPELLS:Contact Outer > Plane" My version of the source no longer has a faeries_feats_hidden.list. Do you know the names of the feats making these references. That way I can look them up and see what their talking about. > 6 - Reference to a "Metal" domain, when there isn't one > in the set or the SRD. > > data\alpha\bastionpress\faeries\faeries_spells.lst > (Line 42): No DOMAIN entry for "DOMAINS:Metal" Only the Fey and Fey Roads domains are introduced in this book but it does make use of the oathbound campaign but I can't find it there either. I would suggest removing the domain entry and wait to see if someone comments on it, then we may find out where that domain was introduced. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Eddy Anthony (eddyanthony) Date: 2005-12-08 06:25 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=886893 I've got no problem with fixing these under one blanket tracker, it all get documented one way or the other. I've sent off an email to Darkon to see if he can clear any of this up. If he can great, If we can't get them all knocked out then we can open separate trackers for the remaining issus. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Andrew McDougall (tir-gwaith) Date: 2005-12-08 01:34 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=208239 File version 1.1 commit comment: [ 1048965 ] Bastion Press - Faeries New souce entered by Darkon Turas When these get fixed, it would be good to add right under the #CVS line - #Original Author: Darkon Turas ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Andrew McDougall (tir-gwaith) Date: 2005-12-08 01:32 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=208239 Section 15 lists "Darkon Turas, Eddy Anthony (MoSaT), Andrew McDougall (Tir Gwaith)." I'd say original author is Darkon Turas, even tho there isn't a comment at the top deliniating it (I can add that at the top if this is the case.) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Martijn Verburg (karianna) Date: 2005-12-08 01:20 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=252169 Hmmm normally I'd say seperate trackers, but we've had several items wrapped up like this recently on the data side, it seems most of the time data monkeys like to fix these in a batch. I'll definitely split it later if need be. Eddy, who was the author of this LST file? - K ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Andrew McDougall (tir-gwaith) Date: 2005-12-07 15:39 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=208239 Kar, Outstanding issues - separate trackers for each one? I don't own the source... Eddy might have a clue on some of these... I leave it in your capable paws. When whatever is done for the outside issues tracker-wise, this one can be closed. I'm committing the major cleanup as soon as I add myself to the COPYRIGHT and OGL.txt sections. - Tir Gwaith ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=750091&aid=1375795&group_id=25576 |
From: SourceForge.net <no...@so...> - 2008-09-09 02:24:41
|
Data Bugs item #1375795, was opened at 2005-12-07 15:35 Message generated for change (Settings changed) made by amaitland You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=750091&aid=1375795&group_id=25576 Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the comment thread, including the initial issue submission, for this request, not just the latest update. Category: Missing Source Information Group: For 5.16.0 >Status: Closed >Resolution: Fixed Priority: 6 Private: No Submitted By: Andrew McDougall (tir-gwaith) Assigned to: LegacyKing (amaitland) Summary: [Bastion Press] Faeries cleanup Initial Comment: Lots of Prettylst cleanup. JEP cleanup reorganized file structure to put hidden feats in separate file as standard Lots of linking cleanup - bad references Outstanding issues: 1 - BONUS:VAR with [PRELEVEL] # What is meant by "(TL+9)/8[PRELEVEL:3]" ? - Tir Gwaith # - (TL+9)/8|PRELEVEL:3 # - (TL+9)/8|!PRELEVEL:3 prettylst lines: data\alpha\bastionpress\faeries\faeries_races.lst (Line 9): Jep syntax error found near "[PRELEVEL:3]" in "BONUS:VAR|RacialTraitsECL|(TL+9)/8[PRELEVEL:3]" (Line 11): Jep syntax error found near "[PRELEVEL:3]" in "BONUS:VAR|RacialTraitsECL|(TL+9)/8[PRELEVEL:3]" (Line 12): Jep syntax error found near "[PRELEVEL:3]" in "BONUS:VAR|RacialTraitsECL|(TL+9)/8[PRELEVEL:3]" (Line 15): Jep syntax error found near "[PRELEVEL:3]" in "BONUS:VAR|RacialTraitsECL|(TL+9)/8[PRELEVEL:3]" 2 - DC / CASTERLEVEL for various SPELLS tags 3 - DEITY tag in class object. I'm not sure about this one, but listed in prettylst. data\alpha\bastionpress\faeries\faeries_classes.lst (Line 6): The tag "DEITY" from "DEITY:None (Faemancer)" is not in the CLASS tag list 4 - Missing Feat "Mite Fighter" Referenced in several PREFEAT: checks. There is an "Improved Mite Fighter" feat (and it needs the original) 5 - Several SPELLS entries I'm not sure what is meant. (Luck, when the spells file lists "Good Luck" and "Bad Luck", that sort of thing) data\alpha\bastionpress\faeries\faeries_feats_hidden.lst (Line 86): No SPELL entry for "SPELLS:Shrink" data\alpha\bastionpress\faeries\faeries_races.lst (Line 9): No SPELL entry for "SPELLS:Luck" (Line 13): No SPELL entry for "SPELLS:Luck" (Line 15): No SPELL entry for "SPELLS:Luck" data\alpha\bastionpress\faeries\faeries_templates_focus.lst (Line 44): No SPELL entry for "SPELLS:Clairaudience" (Line 44): No SPELL entry for "SPELLS:Clairvoyance" (Line 45): No SPELL entry for "SPELLS:Contact Outer Plane" 6 - Reference to a "Metal" domain, when there isn't one in the set or the SRD. data\alpha\bastionpress\faeries\faeries_spells.lst (Line 42): No DOMAIN entry for "DOMAINS:Metal" ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: LegacyKing (amaitland) Date: 2008-09-08 19:24 Message: Closing tracker. Major overhaul, massive data updates, improvement and additions made. Only outstanding item is the newly made kits. I'll make a new tracker for that one item. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: LegacyKing (amaitland) Date: 2008-09-04 13:15 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1286039 Originator: NO Obtained a copy of the book... will review and fix the set to current standards. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: LegacyKing (amaitland) Date: 2008-05-19 01:04 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1286039 Originator: NO Fixing up what I see here... Good Luck and Bad Luck are both listed in the spells.lst Entered Mite Fighter in the feat list... Improved Mite Fighter and Insight of the Fey are duplicates - removed the PREREQs from Insight of the fey and replaced with the errata listed, Base WILL Save of +2. Sent an email to Paul G. to see if he can send me a copy so I can go through the set real quick, or if he can touch it up. Outstanding issues I cannot fix with out the source: SPELLLIST for the spell casting fey classes Full info for Insight of the Fey (feat) SPells tag, I looked but unless they need a save, I think we can leave off the DC (Spell Name,<DC> most were of the harmless no save variety. I will upload/commit the fixes into the 5.14 branch. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: LegacyKing (amaitland) Date: 2008-05-17 20:24 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1286039 Originator: NO Eric, where do we stand in this file? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Paul Grosse (nylanfs) Date: 2007-12-10 17:49 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=928124 Originator: NO Found my pdf copy of Spells and Magic. Here's the Mite fighter feat. Mite Fighter [General] You are especially adept at battling creatures smaller than yourself. Prerequisites: Base Reflex Save +4, Base Attack Bonus +4 Benefit: When fighting a creature smaller than yourself, you gain a +2 bonus on your attack rolls. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Paul Grosse (nylanfs) Date: 2007-12-07 19:33 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=928124 Originator: NO Mite Fighter isn't listed anywhere in the source it is a Pre-req for Improved Mite Fighter. It's listed as being detailed in Spells and Magic. And isn't mentioned in the Sec. 15 Good luck is mentioned in the Feeorin racial abilities Luck is referenced in listed in the Bogie, Half-Fey and Sprite I would say that it is referencing the "Luck of the Fey" spell and not the Good or Bad luck spells but was changed to Luck for printing purposes, or it's a typo. The DC/Caster level for the racial info is as a sorcerer of the same character level, so it's CHA based. Insite of the Fey is listed with Base Will save at +3 but errata'd to +2 What classes abilities need the DC's? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Paul W. King (kingpaul) Date: 2007-11-21 19:14 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=277877 Originator: NO I tried to get answers on this thread in the DW forums: http://dragonwing.net/Forum/index.php?topic=35.0 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: LegacyKing (amaitland) Date: 2007-11-21 00:37 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1286039 Originator: NO Requested Eric see what he can do on the PL side... Reassigning the Tracker to him for now. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Paul W. King (kingpaul) Date: 2007-06-23 21:42 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=277877 Originator: NO Tir, I've sent an email off to Steve about your questions. I know longer get emails from SF on tracker updates, so its a bit difficult for me to follow them anymore. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Andrew McDougall (tir-gwaith) Date: 2007-05-20 08:21 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=208239 Originator: YES Errata makes me feel this set needs even more work. NOT MENTIONED - Definition of "Mite Fighter" feat, NOT MENTIONED (in a previous source?) - Definition for Metal Domain - mentioned in one spell only.. NOT MENTIONED, but the like to leave a lot to 'DM' - "Luck" spell is mentioned in several race entries. There is no definition of "Luck" spell, but "Good Luck" and "Bad Luck" NOT MENTIONED - DC / Casterlevel for classes and domains info (if that was designed) Of NOTE: Q: Why does the feat “Insight of the Fey” require a base Will save +3 at 1st level? A: This should be a base Will save of +2 at 1st level. - Current dataset has 'Insight of the Fey' with the exact same requirements as Improved Mite Fighter (line above it). Mistake in the PREreqs, possibly extending beyond this feat (is more than one feat PRExxx off by one line?) Since this still requires further clarification, I'm downgrading Priority to past 5.12. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Andrew McDougall (tir-gwaith) Date: 2007-05-20 08:20 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=208239 Originator: YES Errata makes me feel this set needs even more work. NOT MENTIONED - Definition of "Mite Fighter" feat, NOT MENTIONED (in a previous source?) - Definition for Metal Domain - mentioned in one spell only.. NOT MENTIONED, but the like to leave a lot to 'DM' - "Luck" spell is mentioned in several race entries. There is no definition of "Luck" spell, but "Good Luck" and "Bad Luck" NOT MENTIONED - DC / Casterlevel for classes and domains info (if that was designed) Of NOTE: Q: Why does the feat “Insight of the Fey” require a base Will save +3 at 1st level? A: This should be a base Will save of +2 at 1st level. - Current dataset has 'Insight of the Fey' with the exact same requirements as Improved Mite Fighter (line above it). Mistake in the PREreqs, possibly extending beyond this feat (is more than one feat PRExxx off by one line?) Since this still requires further clarification, I'm downgrading Priority to past 5.12. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Paul W. King (kingpaul) Date: 2006-10-13 21:39 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=277877 Tir, Steve Creech pointed me to the errata page: http://dragonwing.net/downloads/Faeries_errata.pdf If this doesn't help you out, let me know and I'll get back to him. Paul ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Frank Kliewe (frank_kliewe) Date: 2006-08-30 15:32 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1241568 Setting Priority to 4, since we are waiting for outside input here. -- Frank ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Andrew McDougall (tir-gwaith) Date: 2006-08-24 18:06 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=208239 As mentioned in my comment earlier: - Definition of "Mite Fighter" feat, - Definition for Metal Domain - mentioned in one spell only.. - "Luck" spell is mentioned in several race entries. There is no definition of "Luck" spell, but "Good Luck" and "Bad Luck" - DC / Casterlevel for classes and domains info (if that was designed) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Paul W. King (kingpaul) Date: 2006-08-24 10:22 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=277877 What, exactly, still needs to be asked of Bastion? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Martijn Verburg (karianna) Date: 2006-08-23 01:57 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=252169 Paul, looks like some PL work here... ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Andrew McDougall (tir-gwaith) Date: 2006-03-19 14:49 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=208239 I've adjusted the feats_hidden Fey trait stuff for CASTERLEVEL and DC. Removed #6 - Metal domain reference. Still a bunch of CASTERLEVEL/DC stuff - for classes, mostly. This set is going to need some clarifications, and then some good Data massaging to get all this to work. Committing what I've done so far. David, I'm going to need a PR contact to the publisher for the "Mite Fighter" feat, Domain Metal reference in the single spell, for now. Also need to get ahold of the original entry author and clarify Spell DC/Casterlevel for classes and domains objects. Along with what "Luck" is for SPELLS entry for some races. Both "Good Luck" and "Bad Luck" spells? Send the original author a ZIP of the SVN repos folder for Faeries (Trunk\pcgen\data\alpha\bastionpress\faeries) of Revision 324 or later. That should help him with some of his questions. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Eddy Anthony (eddyanthony) Date: 2005-12-08 19:49 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=886893 Response from Darkon: > 1 - BONUS:VAR with [PRELEVEL] > > # What is meant by "(TL+9)/8[PRELEVEL:3]" ? - Tir Gwaith At third level, a [insert race name here] may pick one ECL point value of Faerie Racial Traits (Including spell-like abilities). Every four levels there thereafter, a [insert race name here] can select an additional half ECL point value of traits or save them to purchase more expensive abilities later. > 2 - DC / CASTERLEVEL for various SPELLS tags These abilities are as the spell cast by a sorceror of the [insert race name here] character level. > 3 - DEITY tag in class object. I'm not sure about this > one, but listed in prettylst. > > data\alpha\bastionpress\faeries\faeries_classes.lst > (Line 6): The tag "DEITY" from "DEITY:None > (Faemancer)" is not in the CLASS tag list Domain (Su): The Faemancer, through experience and luck and the blessings of the FaerieLand, gains access to divine spells. The domain should not be one available to the faemancer from any previous classes, and can be one of the following domains: Air, Animal, Chaos, Dream, Fey, Luck, Magic, Plant, Protection, Travel or Trickery. There spells are retrieved by the fey companions the same as arcane spells are. All faemancer levels count as divine levels when casting these spells. Divine material foci are still required when listed in the spell description, but the spells are otherwise unchanged. New domains asr gained at 3rd, 6th and 9th levels. > 4 - Missing Feat "Mite Fighter" Referenced in several > PREFEAT: checks. There is an "Improved Mite Fighter" > feat (and it needs the original) Apparently the author neglected to add the Mite Fighter feat to the book. Obviously an oversite on his part and mine for not catching something like that. It most likely works like the Improved version but with only a +1 bonus since improved is +2. > 5 - Several SPELLS entries I'm not sure what is meant. > (Luck, when the spells file lists "Good Luck" and "Bad > Luck", that sort of thing) > > data\alpha\bastionpress\faeries\faeries_feats_hidden.lst > (Line 86): No SPELL entry for "SPELLS:Shrink" > data\alpha\bastionpress\faeries\faeries_races.lst > (Line 9): No SPELL entry for "SPELLS:Luck" > (Line 13): No SPELL entry for "SPELLS:Luck" > (Line 15): No SPELL entry for "SPELLS:Luck" > data\alpha\bastionpress\faeries\faeries_templates_focus.lst > (Line 44): No SPELL entry for "SPELLS:Clairaudience" > (Line 44): No SPELL entry for "SPELLS:Clairvoyance" > (Line 45): No SPELL entry for "SPELLS:Contact Outer > Plane" My version of the source no longer has a faeries_feats_hidden.list. Do you know the names of the feats making these references. That way I can look them up and see what their talking about. > 6 - Reference to a "Metal" domain, when there isn't one > in the set or the SRD. > > data\alpha\bastionpress\faeries\faeries_spells.lst > (Line 42): No DOMAIN entry for "DOMAINS:Metal" Only the Fey and Fey Roads domains are introduced in this book but it does make use of the oathbound campaign but I can't find it there either. I would suggest removing the domain entry and wait to see if someone comments on it, then we may find out where that domain was introduced. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Eddy Anthony (eddyanthony) Date: 2005-12-08 06:25 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=886893 I've got no problem with fixing these under one blanket tracker, it all get documented one way or the other. I've sent off an email to Darkon to see if he can clear any of this up. If he can great, If we can't get them all knocked out then we can open separate trackers for the remaining issus. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Andrew McDougall (tir-gwaith) Date: 2005-12-08 01:34 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=208239 File version 1.1 commit comment: [ 1048965 ] Bastion Press - Faeries New souce entered by Darkon Turas When these get fixed, it would be good to add right under the #CVS line - #Original Author: Darkon Turas ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Andrew McDougall (tir-gwaith) Date: 2005-12-08 01:32 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=208239 Section 15 lists "Darkon Turas, Eddy Anthony (MoSaT), Andrew McDougall (Tir Gwaith)." I'd say original author is Darkon Turas, even tho there isn't a comment at the top deliniating it (I can add that at the top if this is the case.) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Martijn Verburg (karianna) Date: 2005-12-08 01:20 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=252169 Hmmm normally I'd say seperate trackers, but we've had several items wrapped up like this recently on the data side, it seems most of the time data monkeys like to fix these in a batch. I'll definitely split it later if need be. Eddy, who was the author of this LST file? - K ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Andrew McDougall (tir-gwaith) Date: 2005-12-07 15:39 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=208239 Kar, Outstanding issues - separate trackers for each one? I don't own the source... Eddy might have a clue on some of these... I leave it in your capable paws. When whatever is done for the outside issues tracker-wise, this one can be closed. I'm committing the major cleanup as soon as I add myself to the COPYRIGHT and OGL.txt sections. - Tir Gwaith ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=750091&aid=1375795&group_id=25576 |