Menu
▾
▴
[Pcgen-trackers] [ pcgen-Feature Requests-627939 ] Don't show unusable alignment spells for clerics
|
From: SourceForge.net <no...@so...> - 2004-09-09 13:59:10
|
Feature Requests item #627939, was opened at 2002-10-24 13:02 Message generated for change (Settings changed) made by zaister You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=384722&aid=627939&group_id=25576 Category: Spell Support Group: None Status: Closed Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Joan Siegenthaler (ashlynne12) >Assigned to: Stefan Radermacher (zaister) Summary: Don't show unusable alignment spells for clerics Initial Comment: Moved from PCGen DM where it was New Source Material Request #626113 Ashlynne TM ---------------------------- Summary ---------------------------- Delete unusable alignment spells Delete unusable alignment spells It would be cool if cleric spells of opposite alignment didn't show up on the spell list. eg Desecrate wasn't listed for a Good cleric. From PCGEN where it was FREQ # 525462 joseFFF TM lemure ----------------------------- Comments ----------------------------- Date: 2002-10-23 19:33 Sender: karianna Logged In: YES user_id=252169 Ash, please move to PCGEN FREQs Karianna TM -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Date: 2002-10-23 19:32 Sender: tir-gwaith Logged In: YES user_id=208239 This is a Code issue. A Wizard can cast spells of opposite alignment. It is a Class by Class issue. So adding a PREALIGN tag to the spell is not going to work (it will cause another bug) Tir Gwaith -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Date: 2002-10-23 19:29 Sender: karianna Logged In: YES user_id=252169 Copying over comments that were missed K ----------------------------------------------------------------- ------------- Date: 2002-10-21 04:51 Sender: mynex Logged In: YES user_id=270475 Karianna, move to DM - FReqs please. The spells are undergoing a revamp (to remove the class spells list file) and when it's done, we will be able to assign (show) the correct spells based on alignment (using the PREALIGN) tag in the spell itself. ----------------------------------------------------------------- --------------- Date: 2002-06-11 09:34 Sender: karianna Logged In: YES user_id=252169 Hi Bryan! Sorry about the previous abrupt questioning. I've received your list of stuff you are currently working on (so now I know better ;p), so the question here is, do you still want this one assigned to you? Karianna Tracker Monkey ----------------------------------------------------------------- --------------- Date: 2002-03-16 04:30 Sender: nobody Logged In: NO Two small probs with that fix. You'd also have to monitor Deity alignment (as well as cleric alignment), and exclude Opposing alignment spells (not non-matching). ie A Neutral cleric of Pelor can't cast Evil spells, but can cast L,C,&G. Oh yeah, a 3rd thing: Summon Monster IX is on all the alignment lists, so it would have to be left out when adding "PREALIGN" or whatever. ----------------------------------------------------------------- --------------- Date: 2002-03-11 07:19 Sender: mynex Logged In: YES user_id=270475 Okay, this is similiar to splitting the spell lists by alignment (as was done once before)... Since this is an issue, we need a better way to determine this within PCGen itself instead of splitting the list files by alignment bulking them up. I would recommend adding code that would read the character alignment, then read the spells present in the spell list/domain list and if the PREALIGN (Would need to be added to the spells that require alignments - this part is list related) doesn't match, then the spell would not be listed as a viable choice for the character. ----------------------------------------------------------------- --------------- Date: 2002-03-06 05:58 Sender: nobody Logged In: NO P32 PHB "C,E,G,L Spells A cleric can't cast spells of an alignment opposed to his own or to his deity's." ----------------------------------------------------------------- --------------- Date: 2002-03-06 03:32 Sender: merton_monk Logged In: YES user_id=195874 It's a valid spell for them - just not a Domain spell. Or am I missing something? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Felipe Diniz (fdiniz) Date: 2003-06-14 17:06 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=615168 657042 was closed. I think this can be done, now. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Martijn Verburg (karianna) Date: 2003-02-05 02:24 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=252169 Sure can, the related freq is 657042 K TM ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Andrew McDougall (tir-gwaith) Date: 2003-01-29 10:57 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=208239 First wave could be done with PREALIGN, for those spells that are both Cleric and other classes, the proposed embedded [PRExxx] tag would be best here CLASSES:Cleric=5[PREALIGN:0,1,2,3,4] CLASSES:Druid=4 For the rest, we could use an enhanced PROHIBITED selection in either Deity.lst or classes.lst to limit spells. Karianna, can you cross reference this FReq with the one about embedding PRExxx tags to CLASSES? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Wayne Crawford (wcrawford69) Date: 2002-12-21 01:27 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=673274 Question, could something be added to the Deity file to exclude spells with certian descriptors? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=384722&aid=627939&group_id=25576 |
