From: SourceForge.net <no...@so...> - 2006-08-26 02:18:41
|
Feature Requests item #1484034, was opened at 2006-05-08 21:03 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by frank_kliewe You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=384722&aid=1484034&group_id=25576 Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the comment thread, including the initial issue submission, for this request, not just the latest update. Category: New tag Group: For 5.12 Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Jay Elmore (jelmore49) Assigned to: Frank Kliewe (frank_kliewe) Summary: New tag for abilities - DC Initial Comment: Many supernatural and spell-like abilities have save DCs; there are some feats and effects that alter the DC of the effect, notably Ability Focus. Until now, there has been no way to affect the save DC of a given ability or class of abilities without specifying arbitrary variable names. It would be nice to have a dedicated DC tag for abilities (and feats, for that matter) that feats like Ability Focus or class/racial abilities that alter DCs can reference. The DC tag should be able to take formulas, since most special ability DCs are derived from a formula: 10 + (1/2 the creature's Hit Dice) + stat mod. A matching bonus tag, BONUS:DC|ABILITY, should also be created. This tag should take the name of an ability as well as a TYPE.* descriptor. It would then be possible to do something like: BONUS:DC|ABILITY|Poison|2 To raise the save DC of a creature's Poison ability by two, or: BONUS:DC|ABILITY|TYPE.Supernatural|1 to raise the save DC of all supernatural abilities by one. (This assumes that the abilities in question have "Supernatural" as a TYPE.) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Frank Kliewe (frank_kliewe) Date: 2006-08-26 04:18 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1241568 Discussion started here:http://groups.yahoo.com/group/pcgen_experimental/message/5836 -- Frank ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Andrew McDougall (tir-gwaith) Date: 2006-08-21 12:19 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=208239 I think I like the concept. Something to consider. Syntax in this proposal is really wonky. Frank, something to discuss on _experimental and hash out? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=384722&aid=1484034&group_id=25576 |