Re: [Re: [Pcbsd-developer] Asked for a Todo list?]

[Andrei K. <an...@bs...>]

Renato Fl=F3rido wrote:

> well, politic is about discussion. at lest it should be.
>
> you didn't understand my point. It's not about changing from one DE to=20
> another, it's about not being tied to a DE.
>
> Linux distros are not even reinventing the wheel, they are discussing=20
> only about each color the whell should have :-D

As I said earlier : let's stick with default KDE environment and make it=20
work properly- only then we can change color and other unimportant things.

> In this case, reinventing (or advancing) is tying the PC-BSD tools to=20
> PC-BSD, not doing it to the DE. If you look carefully, each time a=20
> Linux OS chooses a DE and needs special tools (or different tools)=20
> they start making DE tools. That is different from having the tools DE=20
> independent (can be used with what DE one wishes)which and are=20
> developed for the OS and work no matter what color you paint it.

There is no such thing like Linux OS! Linux even don't have userland=20
like FreeBSD...
Who want change DE? PC-BSD tools is separated from default KDE binaries-=20
there is no need to write another version...

> About The InterNetworking Manager, the permission manager and the=20
> ports gui, it really makes no sense releasing a "desktop" which hasn't=20
> got these basic features if there is a very similar project=20
> (DesktopBSD) which is supposed to aim at a more "educated" user with a=20
> better knowlege of BSD and ships with them.
>
so why not use DesktopBSD Networking Manager- why write our own????=20
Let's cooperate!

> If 1% of the politics were like us we would be in a better world :)))
>