I looking for the way to scroll through program lines... the arrows nor the page up/down keys will do that. Of course I can LIST program lines but if I want to access any program line that's before or after the displayed program lines...... how do you do that?? As I recall the gwbasic editor allowed that...
Thanks!!
If you would like to refer to this comment somewhere else in this project, copy and paste the following link:
There's no other way to scroll through code but to list the lines you're looking for, or to interrupt a listing with Ctrl+Break. Note GW-BASIC didn't have a way to scroll through code either, are you thinking of the QBASIC IDE maybe?
If you would like to refer to this comment somewhere else in this project, copy and paste the following link:
Thanks Rob for the reply... I was looking through some of my
interpreters and I found BDS Basic Development Systems which is their
GWBasic... It allows the use of the arrow keys and the page up/down keys.
Would you like a copy?
There's no other way to scroll through code but to list the lines you're
looking for, or to interrupt a listing with Ctrl+Break. Note GW-BASIC
didn't have a way to scroll through code either, are you thinking of the
QBASIC IDE maybe?
I looking for the way to scroll through program lines... the arrows nor the page up/down keys will do that. Of course I can LIST program lines but if I want to access any program line that's before or after the displayed program lines...... how do you do that?? As I recall the gwbasic editor allowed that...
Thanks!!
Hi Peter,
There's no other way to scroll through code but to list the lines you're looking for, or to interrupt a listing with Ctrl+Break. Note GW-BASIC didn't have a way to scroll through code either, are you thinking of the QBASIC IDE maybe?
Thanks Rob for the reply... I was looking through some of my
interpreters and I found BDS Basic Development Systems which is their
GWBasic... It allows the use of the arrow keys and the page up/down keys.
Would you like a copy?
Peter
On Tue, Jan 12, 2021 at 8:21 AM Rob Hagemans robhagemans@users.sourceforge.net wrote: