From: jmcgee <jm...@je...> - 2010-12-04 22:04:14
|
On Fri, 2010-11-26 at 15:54 -0800, jmcgee wrote: > I'm happy to change the name to --multipass=X, but then I'm not certain > how the parameter should work. If multipass is set to zero should the > default path be generated or not? How would --extra-passes=X be? That > way the zero case is well defined (0 means that 0 extra passes are > generated, but the normal first pass is generated -- 1 would mean 1 > extra path generated, for a total of two)? I've attached my patches for increasing the isolation width. Since I did not get any feedback on the what to call the feature I've named it extra-passes. Both multipass and extra-passes is included in the patches, so you should be able to choose one or the other rather easily. |