From: JT S. <jt...@pl...> - 2004-07-09 22:14:27
|
>Would it be safer here to say "cacheable reads" and "non-cacheable >reads" and get them all from the slaves, forcing an update on the later >types? That way you get your coherency for free. Do you mean forcing the slave to update itself from the master? I see two problems with that: 1) It could take a while for that to happen and therefore be slow. 2) The only way I know how to do that is specific to each database implementation and involves issuing commands to both the master and slave. If I missed your point, please let me know. JT ~ Plain Black Create like a god, command like a king, work like a slave. |