From: Jay R. A. <jr...@ba...> - 2004-07-09 21:21:15
|
On Fri, Jul 09, 2004 at 03:23:54PM -0500, JT Smith wrote: > Therefore you have reads, writes, and high-priority reads. The latter > two need to come from the master, and only the reads can come from the > slave. Would it be safer here to say "cacheable reads" and "non-cacheable reads" and get them all from the slaves, forcing an update on the later types? That way you get your coherency for free. Cheers, -- jra -- Jay R. Ashworth jr...@ba... Designer Baylink RFC 2100 Ashworth & Associates The Things I Think '87 e24 St Petersburg FL USA http://baylink.pitas.com +1 727 647 1274 "You know: I'm a fan of photosynthesis as much as the next guy, but if God merely wanted us to smell the flowers, he wouldn't have invented a 3GHz microprocessor and a 3D graphics board." -- Luke Girardi |