RE: [Passwordsafe-devel] Short term tasks
Popular easy-to-use and secure password manager
Brought to you by:
ronys
From: gregg c. <gr...@ga...> - 2003-04-23 19:29:47
|
thanks for the input john. i like your options and will incorporate them when i work on this item. -gregg At 01:46 PM 4/23/2003 -0400, you wrote: >Hi folks. > >I originally signed on board to help with PalmOS portability. (I'd like >to eventually see a Palm >version hotsyncable to the desktop copy.) > >Just a short comment regarding Gregg's comments: > > > for #5, a collision check could be done and a number appended to entries > > that were the same. in the end, it would be up to the user to > > delete/rename them. the appended number would make them unique, but also > > keep them grouped together. we could also append the notes section to say > > which file a particular entry came from. > >I think this should be an option for the user to choose. > >The program should do a pre-scan to see how many collisions will >happen. It should inform >the user of the collision count and maybe give details on the first >2-3. The user should have >the options of: > >a) Overwrite copy "1" with copy "2" for this collision only, and continue >asking >b) Overwrite copy "2" with copy "1" for this collision only, and continue >asking >c) Overwrite all remaining collisions in copy "1" with copy "2" >d) Overwrite all remaining collisions in copy "2" with copy "1" >e) Make unique "split" (as Gregg described above), for this collision >only, and continue asking >f) Make unique "splits" for all remaining collisions >g) Discontinue the merge > >For each collision (until the user issues one of the "do all" options), >the details of each >collision should be shown. > >* * * > >This scheme is very similar to the behavior you see when merging two >directories of files in >many file management utilities. I think it would be intuitive to operate, >and would allow every >user to have the exact behavior they desire, every time. > >I think it would also save the user some effort: > * I might choose option (c) if I know I am updating a master list with > an update list I carry on >my laptop. (I didn't have to manually edit the splits.) > * I might choose option (e) if I am merging two dissimilar password > databases and don't >expect any collisions. I might go to option (f) if there turned out to be >many collisions. Or I >might use (g) and rethink my strategy. > > >I hope my comments are worth more than... > >Just my $0.02 worth, > -- john baldwin > >_______________________________________________ >Passwordsafe-devel mailing list >Pas...@li... >https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/passwordsafe-devel |