Michalis Kamburelis wrote:
> Arno Garrels wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I worked a bit on support for nested types and uploaded
>> a HTML output of a test case here:
>> http://www.duodata.de/misc/delphi/PasDoc/
>
> That's cool. It's not committed yet as far as I see?
No, not committed yet, I sent you a patch today, the parser changes
are sligthly hacky but at least they work without breaking too much.
IMO DoDi's approach of a design change is something we should
consider seriously sooner or later.
>
>>
>> Currently unit relative qualified names are used for the
>> nested types in overviews. IMO the class hierarchy of all
>> classes should show full qualified names (including unit
>> names) but that looks a bit strange with external,
>> unknown base classes :-( Anyway, what do you think?
>>
>
> The "external classes" feature can be improved to contain unit names,
> that's not a big problem. But I don't know if I like this --- class
> hierarchy page would become full of text, and be very difficult to
> read,
> if you add there unit names. That's IMHO of course, others input is
> welcome.
Agreed, that made it less readable, but took namespace into account.
Anyway, it's easy to change.
--
Arno Garrels
|
