Re: [Pasdoc-main] [RFC] Parsing of the implementation section

[Mark de W. <ko...@xs...>]

On Thu, Dec 22, 2005 at 09:49:35PM +0100, Michalis Kamburelis wrote:
> Mark de wever wrote:
> >On Thu, Dec 15, 2005 at 09:05:28AM +0100, Michalis Kamburelis wrote:
> >
> >>Mark de Wever wrote:
> >>
> >
> >[..]
> >
> >>a) prepare another image img/defined_in_implementation.gif (based on 
> >>e.g. img/private.gif in pasdoc sources)
> >>
> >
> >FYI the images in img are not used in the output, in fact they're not
> >the same as in the output. I'm putting my image in this directory based
> >upon the images as used in the output.
> >
> 
> Ups, you're right. Looking at CVS logs, it seems that at the beginning 
> images in img/*.gif directory corresponded to include files in 
> source/component/*.inc. But then on August 4th, 2003 new version of 
> images were committed -- images in source/component/*.inc were updated, 
> but their corresponding files in img/*.gif were left outdated...
> 
> I just fixed this situation and did some related cleaning that was 
> pending. Up-to-date *.gif images are now placed inside 
> source/components/images/, along with their corresponding *.gif.inc 
> files and a small Makefile to use tools/file_to_pascal_data program to 
> convert between *.gif and *.gif.inc files. Old images in img/ and old 
> include files in source/component/ are removed now. This should make 
> this whole situation cleaner.
[..]

Should pasdoc.css be also be put in the same directory so it's also
always updated?

Regards,

Mark de Wever