Re: [Pasdoc-main] [RFC] Parsing of the implementation section

[Mark de W. <ko...@xs...>]

On Thu, Dec 22, 2005 at 09:49:35PM +0100, Michalis Kamburelis wrote:
> Mark de wever wrote:
> >On Thu, Dec 15, 2005 at 09:05:28AM +0100, Michalis Kamburelis wrote:
> >
> >>Mark de Wever wrote:
> >>
> >
> >[..]
> >
> >>a) prepare another image img/defined_in_implementation.gif (based on 
> >>e.g. img/private.gif in pasdoc sources)
> >>
> >
> >FYI the images in img are not used in the output, in fact they're not
> >the same as in the output. I'm putting my image in this directory based
> >upon the images as used in the output.
> >
> 
> Ups, you're right. Looking at CVS logs, it seems that at the beginning 
> images in img/*.gif directory corresponded to include files in 
> source/component/*.inc. But then on August 4th, 2003 new version of 
> images were committed -- images in source/component/*.inc were updated, 
> but their corresponding files in img/*.gif were left outdated...
> 
> I just fixed this situation and did some related cleaning that was 
> pending. Up-to-date *.gif images are now placed inside 
> source/components/images/, along with their corresponding *.gif.inc 
> files and a small Makefile to use tools/file_to_pascal_data program to 
> convert between *.gif and *.gif.inc files. Old images in img/ and old 
> include files in source/component/ are removed now. This should make 
> this whole situation cleaner.

I also used file_to_pascal_data to convert my images.

> (You may have to wait up to 5 hours to see my modifications in public CVS).

Indeed not there yet.

> Your image for defined_in_implementation.gif should be based on images 
> currently used in the output, not on the outdated things in img/ dir, so 
> you've done right. Your new image should be added now to 
> source/components/images/, and appropriate modification to 
> source/components/images/Makefile should be done to make it's 
> corresponding *.gif.inc file.

Attached a sample of how things are going to look with 
--show-uses=all --show-implementation=all
I only added the declaration symbols for the procedures and functions for now.

When --show-implementation<>all the output as it currently is is used.

I (ab)used the legend of the members at the moment, should we have one
legend page with both or two legend pages?

Mark