Re: [Pasdoc-main] [RFC] Parsing of the implementation section

[Michalis K. <mk...@po...>]

Johannes Berg wrote:
[...]
> 
>>Otherwise, if we really want to have a way to show implementation uses 
>>clause but not items declared in the implementation, we can make new 
>>option, like "--write-uses=yes/no/only-interface" and say that 
>>"--write-uses-list" is just a shortcut for "--write-uses=yes". That's 
>>the way how we can keep compatibility.
> 
> 
> Yes, good idea.
> 

Actually, let's name it "--show-uses=all/interface/no", this way naming 
is a little consistent with --show-implementation. Oh, and 
"--write-uses-list" is a shortcut for "--show-uses=interface" to keep 
compatibility.

Michalis