Re: [Pasdoc-main] [RFC] Parsing of the implementation section

[Johannes B. <joh...@si...>]

On Mon, 2005-12-19 at 14:27 +0100, Michalis Kamburelis wrote:

>    pasdoc --language en foo.pas

Right. Didn't think of that.

> My proposition was just to leave --write-uses-list as it is, and let=20
> --show-implementation decide whether "--write-uses-list means to show=20
> all uses" or "--write-uses-list means to show only interface uses".

I really don't like this. --write-uses-list controls whether to write
the uses list or not, I don't like to move decisions on that into
another option.

> Otherwise, if we really want to have a way to show implementation uses=20
> clause but not items declared in the implementation, we can make new=20
> option, like "--write-uses=3Dyes/no/only-interface" and say that=20
> "--write-uses-list" is just a shortcut for "--write-uses=3Dyes". That's=20
> the way how we can keep compatibility.

Yes, good idea.

johannes