Re: [Pasdoc-main] [RFC] Parsing of the implementation section

[Johannes B. <joh...@si...>]

On Mon, 2005-12-19 at 13:06 +0100, Mark de Wever wrote:

> FYI I just read your mail, it arrived after I send my response to Michali=
s.

Yeah, I wrote it and then was offline for days ;)

> I don't have a strong opinion about the name, but the parameters
> indeed seem to describe the goal not the process. If people agree on
> this I'll use these parameters including the extra options for the
> parameters and their options.

Note that you'll have to hack on OptionParser for this to make different
defaults for the given/non-given case. Shout if you need any help with
that.

johannes