Re: [Pasdoc-main] public type problem

[Aleš P. <ta...@su...>]

Thanks for your help but , change all source for documentation? No thanks :)

A.

2011/6/29 Hans-Peter Diettrich <DrD...@ao...>:
> Michalis Kamburelis schrieb:
>
>> Rereading my own mail a couple of hours later, I probably wrote this too
>> harsh, sorry for that. I just felt like this was discussed and closed
>> already.
>
> The same for me :-(
>
> I'm still willing to contribute, but my efforts should not end up again
> in the current fruitless situation. That's what I want to prevent by the
> listed prerequisites. I'd be comfortable with the implementation of an
> alternative parser, that I could use myself, without an obligation to
> make it the official PasDoc parser.
>
> After my recent work on the FPC parser, and now also having a copy of
> Delphi XE at hand, I can proceed with the implementation of an parser
> for the new syntax (including implementation sections). The remaining
> work would be reduced to the integration of that parser into PasDoc.
>
> DoDi
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> All of the data generated in your IT infrastructure is seriously valuable.
> Why? It contains a definitive record of application performance, security
> threats, fraudulent activity, and more. Splunk takes this data and makes
> sense of it. IT sense. And common sense.
> http://p.sf.net/sfu/splunk-d2d-c2
> _______________________________________________
> Pasdoc-main mailing list
> Pas...@li...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/pasdoc-main
>