|
From: Michalis K. <mic...@gm...> - 2011-06-28 18:45:05
|
Arno Garrels wrote: > Huch? Works fine here, am I missing something? It's a nested record which > should be supported. However I'm not using the latest SVN revision. > Ah, you're right! I tested with old released PasDoc 0.12.1 binary, and saw the example fail there. As embarrassing as it sounds, I simply forgot that we actually have this implemented in SVN (and thanks to you, as far as I remember!). Looks like it's been too long since I've done active work on pasdoc :) So, Ales: the good news is that your example works fine with PasDoc from SVN, thanks to Arno Garrels work. For now, you either have to compile PasDoc yourself (links to SVN and compilation instructions are at the bottom of http://pasdoc.sipsolutions.net/ ), or you have to wait for next PasDoc 0.13.0 release. Maybe someone can post here a Windows binary of pasdoc svn? (I can post a Linux 32-bit one.) For reference, I attach a test unit with Ales record, and with some additions from http://wiki.lazarus.freepascal.org/class_extensions_examples . They all work fine with PasDoc SVN now :) Michalis |