|
From: Arno G. <arn...@gm...> - 2010-11-23 18:32:15
|
Michalis Kamburelis wrote: > Arno Garrels wrote: >> Hi, >> >> I worked a bit on support for nested types and uploaded >> a HTML output of a test case here: >> http://www.duodata.de/misc/delphi/PasDoc/ > > That's cool. It's not committed yet as far as I see? No, not committed yet, I sent you a patch today, the parser changes are sligthly hacky but at least they work without breaking too much. IMO DoDi's approach of a design change is something we should consider seriously sooner or later. > >> >> Currently unit relative qualified names are used for the >> nested types in overviews. IMO the class hierarchy of all >> classes should show full qualified names (including unit >> names) but that looks a bit strange with external, >> unknown base classes :-( Anyway, what do you think? >> > > The "external classes" feature can be improved to contain unit names, > that's not a big problem. But I don't know if I like this --- class > hierarchy page would become full of text, and be very difficult to > read, > if you add there unit names. That's IMHO of course, others input is > welcome. Agreed, that made it less readable, but took namespace into account. Anyway, it's easy to change. -- Arno Garrels |