Re: [Pasdoc-main] PasDoc 0.12.0 release next week, and decisions for PasDoc2 branch

[Hans-Peter D. <DrD...@ao...>]

Michalis Kamburelis schrieb:
> Hans-Peter Diettrich wrote:
>>> Some of them are
>>> range check errors when parsing valid code,
>> I didn't come across such errors, and wasn't informed about such situations.
> 
> See the mail at the beginning of this thread, where I start with
> mentioning which tests fail.

All tests with post-D7 syntax will fail, of course, because I removed 
all new syntax elements from the parser. I don't consider such files 
valid code, for now.

Once provisions for nested declarations have been added to PasDoc, the 
parser has to be reorganized accordingly, and *after all that* the new 
syntax elements can be added, and possibly also parsing of the 
implementation part.

DoDi