[Pas-dev] What's next?

[Kyle R . B. <mo...@vo...>]

I've used Pas now in a few projects where I work over the past two years
or so.  I've found it to perform well, and to be stable.  The feature set 
has been a good fit for the applicaiton domains in which I've used it.
It's worked well enough, there just doesn't seem to be much spark in the
project.

We've tossed around ideas for features, additions and fixes that we'd like
to explore or implement across this mailing list.  Some of them have been 
implemented because we either needed the feature or they were implemented 
as the opportunity arose, effectivly a bonus, when some bug got fixed.  
Though largely they've fallen aside and haven't received much attention.

There hasn't been a whole lot of need for new features or approaches.  There
hasn't been much vision for the project.  I suppose a large part of that
is that I'm the defacto visionary and I haven't been doing a very good
job of driving the project.

Towards the goals of where Pas should go from here, I'd like to solicit
your feedback on Pas in the past, what we have in the present, and what
you would like to see going forward.  Not just the parts that irk you,
or the new minor features you'd lke to have, but also what might excite
you, what you'd like to work on or see worked on.  I'm looking for
your personal opinions and not just your technical desires.



Kyle


-- 

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Wisdom and Compassion are inseparable.
        -- Christmas Humphreys
mo...@vo...                            http://www.voicenet.com/~mortis
------------------------------------------------------------------------------