Re: [Pas-dev] css (security)
Status: Beta
Brought to you by:
mortis
From: Kyle R . B. <mo...@vo...> - 2002-05-17 16:05:38
|
> Yes, but what if you never plan on using that? :) True. True. > It absolutely should be configurable. Just like the include file > datecheck stuff. Great. > And it doesnt need to be angle brackets we worry about. We can look for > /\<\s*script/ whatever... this is why I'm asking. :) > > An optional 'block the skript kiddies' filter might be nice. Ah, I wasn't thinking that way. Give the hampster a minute to get the wheel craked all the way up. > Correct. Again, we could have several choices. And hopefully some user > contributed filters as well. That would rock. > I'm afraid you're off on the angle bracket thing. That was only one of > my half baked ideas. The other was deterministicly looking for > <SCRIPT>, <OBJECT>, <APPLET>, and <EMBED> > The angle bracket thing was my over simplified method for dealing with > them. I like this. That would be a nice filter to have. This would be an inbound filter for query data correct? I am liking this more and more... > If developers _want_ to pass these along, then in my mind thats no > different than complaining something isnt suid. If you want to disable > the safety, fine. But dont complain to me when you shoot yourself in the > foot. Thats all. Ok, we do it as an optional input filter with the default behavior being set to on. If they turn it off, that's their descision. > Ok, so a plugin you can optionally turn off that looks for the tags > mentioned in the cert advisory > (http://www.cert.org/advisories/CA-2000-02.html) then? +1 You konw if we have this feature, it'll set our product apart from most of the other web development systems out there... Thanks for the idea Jason! Kyle -- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Wisdom and Compassion are inseparable. -- Christmas Humphreys mo...@vo... http://www.voicenet.com/~mortis ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ |