Re: [Panopticode-users] Integrating Panopticode in multiproject setups

[Julias R S. <ju...@ju...>]

On May 25, 2007, at 12:00 PM, Eric Pugh wrote:

> Funny you bring that stuff up!  One of our guys just mocked up some  
> sort of aggregation tool.  And adding some data obfuscation would  
> really help on the sharing level of things!
>
> I've attached as a Safari Web Archive the dashboard mockup.
>
> I am taking a break next week from this stuff next week to help  
> another project hit a deploy goal.  I'm hoping to take a step back  
> from coding on dashboard and get it packaged up and open source,  
> I'll let you know how it goes!
>
> Should we be having these conversations on the mailing list in  
> order to help build community and involvement?

Yes we should :)

> Eric
> <Dashboard Mockup.webarchive>
>
> On May 25, 2007, at 1:36 PM, Julias R Shaw wrote:
>
>> Thats Awesome!  I'm at a client right now where they really need  
>> to see the big picture view as well as the project view.  Let me  
>> know when you release Dasher, we might could use something like it.
>>
>> The use of an instrumented directory is a good idea.  It will  
>> increase the build time a bit, but that shouldn't be an issue.   
>> I'll definitely get that added into the initial alpha of 0.2.
>>
>> Your feedback has been a great help Eric.  I really appreciate it.
>>
>> My todo list for the weekend is getting pretty long, but I'd also  
>> like to be able to start drawing treemaps that show the whole org  
>> at one time.  I'll let you know when I get something working.
>>
>> To give you a peek into the future, another feature a ways down on  
>> the priority list is to add data obfuscation so that people can  
>> share their visualizations without letting their IP out.  I'm  
>> starting to get a good feel for the patterns of good/bad systems  
>> and when software is starting to go wrong.  If we could all share  
>> our pictures safely then I think many others would develop the  
>> same eye and that would be a great thing for software in general.
>>
>> Cheers,
>>
>> Julias
>>
>>
>> On May 25, 2007, at 6:00 AM, Eric Pugh wrote:
>>
>>> Very cool...  I just rolled out last night Panopticode over our  
>>> clients code base, have ~30 projects under it.  "Dasher"  
>>> aggregates the various statistics into a single page, pulling in  
>>> the thumbnail images!
>>>
>>> I'll be posting Dasher hopefully next week as an open source  
>>> project.  Still trying to come up with a better name for a  
>>> Dashboard metrics tool!
>>>
>>> Having Panopticode as my source for analysis data is great.
>>>
>>> So, my other challenge/tweak to Panopticode is to have the  
>>> instrumented code go into a /target/instrumented directory,  
>>> instead of /target/classes.  Some folks are accidentally pulling  
>>> in instrumented code into their larger builds!
>>>
>>> Eric
>>>
>>> On May 24, 2007, at 8:05 PM, Julias R Shaw wrote:
>>>
>>>> Howdy Eric,
>>>>
>>>> Good point.
>>>>
>>>> I'm going to try to get an alpha of 0.2 out this weekend.  Among  
>>>> other things, it will be a lot more flexible about which  
>>>> supplements, such as Emma, that it is running.  I'll also look  
>>>> into ways to behave more gracefully in situations where there  
>>>> are no unit tests.
>>>>
>>>> Already in 0.2 is support for CheckStyle, Complexian, CKJM, and  
>>>> JDepend.
>>>>
>>>> Less likely to be in this weekend's release, but still planned  
>>>> for 0.2 is a new file format (rdf+xml), Subversion support, and  
>>>> ad hoc Treemap generation.
>>>>
>>>> Thanks,
>>>>
>>>> Julias
>>>>
>>>> On May 24, 2007, at 4:04 PM, Eric Pugh wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Hi all,
>>>>>
>>>>> I notice that with 0.1 that if you don't have unit tests, then  
>>>>> things
>>>>> fail because emma.xml doesn't exist.   However, in my  
>>>>> situation, I am
>>>>> leveraging the various reports that Panopticode produces, and  
>>>>> there
>>>>> is value even if there aren't any unit tests.  I'm working  
>>>>> around it
>>>>> by tossing in a very simple test, which sets the pattern for the
>>>>> future, but it seems that Panopticode should never fail, or if  
>>>>> things
>>>>> can fail, they should be an optional setting.....
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Eric
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> -------------------------------------------------------
>>>>> Principal
>>>>> OpenSource Connections
>>>>> Site: http://www.opensourceconnections.com
>>>>> Blog: http://blog.opensourceconnections.com
>>>>> Cell: 1-434-466-1467
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------ 
>>>>> -------
>>>>> This SF.net email is sponsored by DB2 Express
>>>>> Download DB2 Express C - the FREE version of DB2 express and take
>>>>> control of your XML. No limits. Just data. Click to get it now.
>>>>> http://sourceforge.net/powerbar/db2/
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> Panopticode-users mailing list
>>>>> Pan...@li...
>>>>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/panopticode-users
>>>>
>>>
>>> -------------------------------------------------------
>>> Principal
>>> OpenSource Connections
>>> Site: http://www.opensourceconnections.com
>>> Blog: http://blog.opensourceconnections.com
>>> Cell: 1-434-466-1467
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>
> -------------------------------------------------------
> Principal
> OpenSource Connections
> Site: http://www.opensourceconnections.com
> Blog: http://blog.opensourceconnections.com
> Cell: 1-434-466-1467
>
>
>
>