Re: [Panopticode-users] Integrating Panopticode in multiproject setups

[Julias R S. <ju...@ju...>]

Howdy Eric,

Good point.

I'm going to try to get an alpha of 0.2 out this weekend.  Among  
other things, it will be a lot more flexible about which supplements,  
such as Emma, that it is running.  I'll also look into ways to behave  
more gracefully in situations where there are no unit tests.

Already in 0.2 is support for CheckStyle, Complexian, CKJM, and JDepend.

Less likely to be in this weekend's release, but still planned for  
0.2 is a new file format (rdf+xml), Subversion support, and ad hoc  
Treemap generation.

Thanks,

Julias

On May 24, 2007, at 4:04 PM, Eric Pugh wrote:

> Hi all,
>
> I notice that with 0.1 that if you don't have unit tests, then things
> fail because emma.xml doesn't exist.   However, in my situation, I am
> leveraging the various reports that Panopticode produces, and there
> is value even if there aren't any unit tests.  I'm working around it
> by tossing in a very simple test, which sets the pattern for the
> future, but it seems that Panopticode should never fail, or if things
> can fail, they should be an optional setting.....
>
>
> Eric
>
>
>
> -------------------------------------------------------
> Principal
> OpenSource Connections
> Site: http://www.opensourceconnections.com
> Blog: http://blog.opensourceconnections.com
> Cell: 1-434-466-1467
>
>
>
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------- 
> ---
> This SF.net email is sponsored by DB2 Express
> Download DB2 Express C - the FREE version of DB2 express and take
> control of your XML. No limits. Just data. Click to get it now.
> http://sourceforge.net/powerbar/db2/
> _______________________________________________
> Panopticode-users mailing list
> Pan...@li...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/panopticode-users