Hello,
On Mon, Nov 20, 2000 at 08:04:45PM +0100, Dr Gabriele Gallacci wrote:
> I've worked a lot with Mysql (since 2 years), and I find it a speedy,
> manageable db server.
> But it suffers a lot from not having some functions, like transaction and
> triggers: I think they are very important, expecially in a pam-sql project.
Transactions were introduced to MySQL in may this year.
> The point: why do you use MySQL, and not for example, PostgreSQL?
MySQL is being actively developed, and given a little time I think it will
mature. Besides, it is the most popular opensource database engine, is easy to
use, is/can be integrated with lots of opensource software, and is quite fast+
feature rich already.
Cheers,
--
Anders.
|
