From: Oded A. <ode...@ty...> - 2006-04-03 08:36:08
|
On Sunday, 2 =D7=91April 2006 21:43, Gary W. Smith wrote: > Bad boy... But that's about how we had to do it as well. There is > still a problem with users that infrequently log into the system. We > have some users that have multiple accounts and rarely use their > secondary accounts (which are critical to their configuration). Yes, a problem. I will solve this by simply ignoring the problem until=20 someone fails to use their account and call me. I can do this because I=20 have just a few users (or anyway - a few infrequent users), they can=20 easily call me or one of the other admins and nothing on that setup is=20 mission critical (AFAIK).=20 With most other setups, this is probably the wrong approach. I haven't=20 yet disabled old passwords (though I intend to do it soon), so I can't=20 vouch for how well my solution works ;-) > Something we did for those users that had the problem with messed up > passwords is to create a web page for them to go to that just > validates their password. That is, it would ask them for their login > and password.=20 This is OK if your users won't mind getting a "please validate your=20 password" notices. Most of my users will freak out if they get=20 something like that - these kind of scams are very frequent on the=20 internet :-( If its manageable, then I suggest setting up a "change my password" web=20 page which uses PAM (or any other method) to validate the old password=20 and set a new one, and then manually emailing, calling or walking over=20 to each user and ask them to use that - or your standard password=20 change interface - to change the password. =2D-=20 Oded ::.. "The reasonable man adapts himself to the world; the unreasonable one=20 persists in trying to adapt the world to himself. Therefore all=20 progress depends on the unreasonable man." -- George Bernard Shaw |