Re: [Pam-mysql-general] suggestion

[Anders N. <an...@fi...>]

Hello,

On Mon, Nov 20, 2000 at 08:04:45PM +0100, Dr Gabriele Gallacci wrote:
>  I've worked a lot with Mysql (since 2 years), and I find it a speedy,
> manageable db server.
>  But it suffers a lot from not having some functions, like transaction and
> triggers: I think they are very important, expecially in a pam-sql project.

Transactions were introduced to MySQL in may this year.

>  The point: why do you use MySQL, and not for example, PostgreSQL?

MySQL is being actively developed, and given a little time I think it will
mature. Besides, it is the most popular opensource database engine, is easy to
use, is/can be integrated with lots of opensource software, and is quite fast+
feature rich already.

Cheers,

-- 
Anders.