You can subscribe to this list here.
2007 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
(3) |
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2008 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
(1) |
May
(17) |
Jun
(23) |
Jul
(40) |
Aug
(48) |
Sep
(32) |
Oct
(38) |
Nov
(36) |
Dec
(78) |
2009 |
Jan
(31) |
Feb
(76) |
Mar
(44) |
Apr
(92) |
May
(84) |
Jun
(71) |
Jul
(50) |
Aug
(68) |
Sep
(42) |
Oct
(40) |
Nov
(28) |
Dec
(53) |
2010 |
Jan
(52) |
Feb
(81) |
Mar
(60) |
Apr
(57) |
May
(50) |
Jun
(42) |
Jul
(85) |
Aug
(51) |
Sep
(61) |
Oct
(59) |
Nov
(51) |
Dec
(36) |
2011 |
Jan
(121) |
Feb
(172) |
Mar
(133) |
Apr
(116) |
May
(116) |
Jun
(78) |
Jul
(98) |
Aug
(148) |
Sep
(90) |
Oct
(151) |
Nov
(100) |
Dec
(161) |
2012 |
Jan
(159) |
Feb
(135) |
Mar
(204) |
Apr
(149) |
May
(156) |
Jun
(118) |
Jul
(154) |
Aug
(146) |
Sep
(226) |
Oct
(186) |
Nov
(77) |
Dec
(92) |
2013 |
Jan
(109) |
Feb
(117) |
Mar
(115) |
Apr
(148) |
May
(216) |
Jun
(271) |
Jul
(382) |
Aug
(323) |
Sep
(157) |
Oct
(120) |
Nov
(110) |
Dec
(113) |
2014 |
Jan
(192) |
Feb
(120) |
Mar
(185) |
Apr
(117) |
May
(150) |
Jun
(205) |
Jul
(169) |
Aug
(239) |
Sep
(197) |
Oct
(117) |
Nov
(148) |
Dec
(121) |
2015 |
Jan
(170) |
Feb
(290) |
Mar
(252) |
Apr
(349) |
May
(417) |
Jun
(351) |
Jul
(234) |
Aug
(188) |
Sep
(126) |
Oct
(333) |
Nov
(153) |
Dec
(115) |
2016 |
Jan
(212) |
Feb
(272) |
Mar
(181) |
Apr
(221) |
May
(222) |
Jun
(275) |
Jul
(160) |
Aug
(151) |
Sep
(165) |
Oct
(137) |
Nov
(111) |
Dec
(83) |
2017 |
Jan
(191) |
Feb
(140) |
Mar
(145) |
Apr
(109) |
May
(218) |
Jun
(112) |
Jul
(219) |
Aug
(191) |
Sep
(105) |
Oct
(217) |
Nov
(196) |
Dec
(158) |
2018 |
Jan
(303) |
Feb
(138) |
Mar
(93) |
Apr
(64) |
May
(239) |
Jun
(204) |
Jul
(181) |
Aug
(191) |
Sep
(91) |
Oct
(119) |
Nov
(158) |
Dec
(162) |
2019 |
Jan
(168) |
Feb
(218) |
Mar
(126) |
Apr
(178) |
May
(154) |
Jun
(147) |
Jul
(279) |
Aug
(179) |
Sep
(126) |
Oct
(118) |
Nov
(73) |
Dec
(70) |
2020 |
Jan
(135) |
Feb
(157) |
Mar
(187) |
Apr
(100) |
May
(112) |
Jun
(111) |
Jul
(117) |
Aug
(87) |
Sep
(92) |
Oct
(237) |
Nov
(134) |
Dec
(147) |
2021 |
Jan
(58) |
Feb
(79) |
Mar
(191) |
Apr
(193) |
May
(95) |
Jun
(155) |
Jul
(146) |
Aug
(86) |
Sep
(106) |
Oct
(69) |
Nov
(102) |
Dec
(71) |
2022 |
Jan
(70) |
Feb
(198) |
Mar
(89) |
Apr
(88) |
May
(65) |
Jun
(57) |
Jul
(92) |
Aug
(41) |
Sep
(81) |
Oct
(112) |
Nov
(56) |
Dec
(106) |
2023 |
Jan
(98) |
Feb
(14) |
Mar
(130) |
Apr
(62) |
May
(40) |
Jun
(36) |
Jul
(32) |
Aug
(34) |
Sep
(18) |
Oct
(48) |
Nov
(44) |
Dec
(20) |
2024 |
Jan
(36) |
Feb
(75) |
Mar
(70) |
Apr
(67) |
May
(57) |
Jun
(55) |
Jul
(48) |
Aug
(44) |
Sep
(63) |
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
From: Goimard, J. <jeg...@ak...> - 2024-09-05 19:16:00
|
Hum, I just realized that the containers are not used in pfqueue services. https://github.com/inverse-inc/packetfence/blob/devel/conf/systemd/packetfence-pfqueue-go.service#L21 So, you should be able to find them in that directory: /usr/local/pf/sbin/ NOTE: the command lines for the status are still valid. Thank you Regards Jeremy Goimard Senior Software Engineer [signature_117474225] Office: +1 613 670 8438 Akamai Technologies - Inverse 145 Broadway Cambridge, MA 02142 Connect with Us: [signature_1388875202]<https://community.akamai.com/> [signature_3364560605] <http://blogs.akamai.com/> [signature_2499095976] <https://twitter.com/akamai> [signature_3425345268] <http://www.facebook.com/AkamaiTechnologies> [signature_4082763092] <http://www.linkedin.com/company/akamai-technologies> [signature_1928680685] <http://www.youtube.com/user/akamaitechnologies?feature=results_main> ________________________________ From: Jori Luoto <out...@ou...> on behalf of Jori Luoto <jo...@lu...> Sent: Thursday, September 5, 2024 12:54 PM To: Goimard, Jeremy; pac...@li... Subject: Re: PF 13.2 / Debian 11 problem: missing pfqueue Hello, Thanks for info. . I used apt-get method to Debian 11. Will do re-install tomorrow and see how it goes. . Lähettäjä: Goimard, Jeremy <jegoimar@ akamai. com> Lähetetty: Thursday, September 5, 2024 7: 48: 51 PM Vastaanottaja: packetfence-users@ lists. sourceforge. net ZjQcmQRYFpfptBannerStart This Message Is From an Untrusted Sender You have not previously corresponded with this sender. ZjQcmQRYFpfptBannerEnd Hello, Thanks for info.. I used apt-get method to Debian 11. Will do re-install tomorrow and see how it goes.. ________________________________ Lähettäjä: Goimard, Jeremy <jeg...@ak...> Lähetetty: Thursday, September 5, 2024 7:48:51 PM Vastaanottaja: pac...@li... <pac...@li...> Kopio: Jori Luoto <jo...@lu...> Aihe: Re: PF 13.2 / Debian 11 problem: missing pfqueue Hi Jory, pfqueue is a service that has been containerized and is split in two services: https://github.com/inverse-inc/packetfence/blob/devel/conf/systemd/packetfence-pfqueue-backend.service<https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://github.com/inverse-inc/packetfence/blob/devel/conf/systemd/packetfence-pfqueue-backend.service__;!!GjvTz_vk!UyV-1Hr8nC_ZrntTPHLVsf6EU0OLwtSpP-vGewxdBOjChkdQBVVapczZD9j5ac7-HKuH8ZwP17Ur$> https://github.com/inverse-inc/packetfence/blob/devel/conf/systemd/packetfence-pfqueue-go.service<https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://github.com/inverse-inc/packetfence/blob/devel/conf/systemd/packetfence-pfqueue-go.service__;!!GjvTz_vk!UyV-1Hr8nC_ZrntTPHLVsf6EU0OLwtSpP-vGewxdBOjChkdQBVVapczZD9j5ac7-HKuH8XeGBoJU$> You can check the status with `systemctl status packetfence-pfqueue-backend` or `systemctl status packetfence-pfqueue-go` Which installation process did you use? 4.1, 4.2 or 4.3 Thanks Regards Jeremy Goimard Senior Software Engineer [signature_117474225] Office: +1 613 670 8438 Akamai Technologies - Inverse 145 Broadway Cambridge, MA 02142 Connect with Us: [signature_1388875202]<https://community.akamai.com/> [signature_3364560605] <http://blogs.akamai.com/> [signature_2499095976] <https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://twitter.com/akamai__;!!GjvTz_vk!UyV-1Hr8nC_ZrntTPHLVsf6EU0OLwtSpP-vGewxdBOjChkdQBVVapczZD9j5ac7-HKuH8a_MqNGW$> [signature_3425345268] <https://urldefense.com/v3/__http://www.facebook.com/AkamaiTechnologies__;!!GjvTz_vk!UyV-1Hr8nC_ZrntTPHLVsf6EU0OLwtSpP-vGewxdBOjChkdQBVVapczZD9j5ac7-HKuH8W30fSJL$> [signature_4082763092] <https://urldefense.com/v3/__http://www.linkedin.com/company/akamai-technologies__;!!GjvTz_vk!UyV-1Hr8nC_ZrntTPHLVsf6EU0OLwtSpP-vGewxdBOjChkdQBVVapczZD9j5ac7-HKuH8eQ7xukg$> [signature_1928680685] <https://urldefense.com/v3/__http://www.youtube.com/user/akamaitechnologies?feature=results_main__;!!GjvTz_vk!UyV-1Hr8nC_ZrntTPHLVsf6EU0OLwtSpP-vGewxdBOjChkdQBVVapczZD9j5ac7-HKuH8fXqg0l_$> ________________________________ From: Jori Luoto via PacketFence-users <pac...@li...> Sent: Thursday, September 5, 2024 4:43:47 AM To: pac...@li... Cc: Jori Luoto Subject: [PacketFence-users] PF 13.2 / Debian 11 problem: missing pfqueue Hello, Just installed PF13. 2 using https: //www. packetfence. org/doc/PacketFence_Installation_Guide. html as documentation but Status->Services tells me that pfqueue cannot be found. I think file should be in /usr/local/pf/bin/ but it's not ZjQcmQRYFpfptBannerStart This Message Is From an External Sender This message came from outside your organization. ZjQcmQRYFpfptBannerEnd Hello, Just installed PF13.2 using https://www.packetfence.org/doc/PacketFence_Installation_Guide.html as documentation but Status->Services tells me that pfqueue cannot be found. I think file should be in /usr/local/pf/bin/ but it's not there... Any idea how can I install it or should I remove whole installation and do it all over again? Regards -jori luoto- |
From: Jori L. <jo...@lu...> - 2024-09-05 16:54:52
|
Hello, Thanks for info.. I used apt-get method to Debian 11. Will do re-install tomorrow and see how it goes.. ________________________________ Lähettäjä: Goimard, Jeremy <jeg...@ak...> Lähetetty: Thursday, September 5, 2024 7:48:51 PM Vastaanottaja: pac...@li... <pac...@li...> Kopio: Jori Luoto <jo...@lu...> Aihe: Re: PF 13.2 / Debian 11 problem: missing pfqueue Hi Jory, pfqueue is a service that has been containerized and is split in two services: https://github.com/inverse-inc/packetfence/blob/devel/conf/systemd/packetfence-pfqueue-backend.service https://github.com/inverse-inc/packetfence/blob/devel/conf/systemd/packetfence-pfqueue-go.service You can check the status with `systemctl status packetfence-pfqueue-backend` or `systemctl status packetfence-pfqueue-go` Which installation process did you use? 4.1, 4.2 or 4.3 Thanks Regards Jeremy Goimard Senior Software Engineer [signature_117474225] Office: +1 613 670 8438 Akamai Technologies - Inverse 145 Broadway Cambridge, MA 02142 Connect with Us: [signature_1388875202]<https://community.akamai.com/> [signature_3364560605] <http://blogs.akamai.com/> [signature_2499095976] <https://twitter.com/akamai> [signature_3425345268] <http://www.facebook.com/AkamaiTechnologies> [signature_4082763092] <http://www.linkedin.com/company/akamai-technologies> [signature_1928680685] <http://www.youtube.com/user/akamaitechnologies?feature=results_main> ________________________________ From: Jori Luoto via PacketFence-users <pac...@li...> Sent: Thursday, September 5, 2024 4:43:47 AM To: pac...@li... Cc: Jori Luoto Subject: [PacketFence-users] PF 13.2 / Debian 11 problem: missing pfqueue Hello, Just installed PF13. 2 using https: //www. packetfence. org/doc/PacketFence_Installation_Guide. html as documentation but Status->Services tells me that pfqueue cannot be found. I think file should be in /usr/local/pf/bin/ but it's not ZjQcmQRYFpfptBannerStart This Message Is From an External Sender This message came from outside your organization. ZjQcmQRYFpfptBannerEnd Hello, Just installed PF13.2 using https://www.packetfence.org/doc/PacketFence_Installation_Guide.html as documentation but Status->Services tells me that pfqueue cannot be found. I think file should be in /usr/local/pf/bin/ but it's not there... Any idea how can I install it or should I remove whole installation and do it all over again? Regards -jori luoto- |
From: Goimard, J. <jeg...@ak...> - 2024-09-05 16:49:07
|
Hi Jory, pfqueue is a service that has been containerized and is split in two services: https://github.com/inverse-inc/packetfence/blob/devel/conf/systemd/packetfence-pfqueue-backend.service https://github.com/inverse-inc/packetfence/blob/devel/conf/systemd/packetfence-pfqueue-go.service You can check the status with `systemctl status packetfence-pfqueue-backend` or `systemctl status packetfence-pfqueue-go` Which installation process did you use? 4.1, 4.2 or 4.3 Thanks Regards Jeremy Goimard Senior Software Engineer [signature_117474225] Office: +1 613 670 8438 Akamai Technologies - Inverse 145 Broadway Cambridge, MA 02142 Connect with Us: [signature_1388875202]<https://community.akamai.com/> [signature_3364560605] <http://blogs.akamai.com/> [signature_2499095976] <https://twitter.com/akamai> [signature_3425345268] <http://www.facebook.com/AkamaiTechnologies> [signature_4082763092] <http://www.linkedin.com/company/akamai-technologies> [signature_1928680685] <http://www.youtube.com/user/akamaitechnologies?feature=results_main> ________________________________ From: Jori Luoto via PacketFence-users <pac...@li...> Sent: Thursday, September 5, 2024 4:43:47 AM To: pac...@li... Cc: Jori Luoto Subject: [PacketFence-users] PF 13.2 / Debian 11 problem: missing pfqueue Hello, Just installed PF13. 2 using https: //www. packetfence. org/doc/PacketFence_Installation_Guide. html as documentation but Status->Services tells me that pfqueue cannot be found. I think file should be in /usr/local/pf/bin/ but it's not ZjQcmQRYFpfptBannerStart This Message Is From an External Sender This message came from outside your organization. ZjQcmQRYFpfptBannerEnd Hello, Just installed PF13.2 using https://www.packetfence.org/doc/PacketFence_Installation_Guide.html as documentation but Status->Services tells me that pfqueue cannot be found. I think file should be in /usr/local/pf/bin/ but it's not there... Any idea how can I install it or should I remove whole installation and do it all over again? Regards -jori luoto- |
From: Jori L. <jo...@lu...> - 2024-09-05 08:43:56
|
Hello, Just installed PF13.2 using https://www.packetfence.org/doc/PacketFence_Installation_Guide.html as documentation but Status->Services tells me that pfqueue cannot be found. I think file should be in /usr/local/pf/bin/ but it's not there... Any idea how can I install it or should I remove whole installation and do it all over again? Regards -jori luoto- |
From: Eersten K. <eer...@gm...> - 2024-09-03 18:41:34
|
hello, we have a mixture of windows domain joined & linux machines as well as IoT, for this reason i was thinking that packetfence would be deployed with policies specific to the type of authentication the client is capable of. a. For windows devices i would create a policy where it used their PC credentials to authenticate on the radius server so that takes care of them, and assigns corp vlan b. For linux devices and IoT i was thinking to just authenticate them with their mac address. so ideally creating a policy that has a list of the 40+ mac addresses that are allowed and then assigned to corp vlan c. And lastly if they fail these two requirements they are dropped to guest vlan How would i be able to achieve this? Section 9.2.2. of instalation guide Installation Guide (packetfence.org) <https://www.packetfence.org/doc/PacketFence_Installation_Guide.html#_vlan_assignment_techniques> describes briefly what i am trying to accomplish but im not clear on steps. thank you |
From: Sallee, J. <Jak...@um...> - 2024-09-03 15:04:00
|
This convo is probably better suited for the users list since the dev list is ostensibly for bugs and other PF development chatter. I'm not angry ... just disappointed : ) Also, the error message says: "Switch is not managed by PacketFence". This normally only happens when the switch is not in the switches.conf file. Essentially PF is responding to the switch and saying "I don't know who you are, go away." Make sure you have added the switch to PF. Jake Sallee MANAGER OF INFORMATION SECURITY AND NETWORKS UMHB Box 8005 | 900 College Street | Belton, Texas 76513 Phone: 254.295.4658 Fax: 254-295-4221 umhb.edu<http://www.umhb.edu/> [cid:image001.png@01D8A0DA.6B4CCE60] <http://facebook.com/umhb> [cid:image002.png@01D8A0DA.6B4CCE60] <http://instagram.com/umhb> [cid:image003.png@01D8A0DA.6B4CCE60] <http://twitter.com/umhb> [ESig_UMHB_Primary_4CP_Purple] ________________________________ From: Md Amer Ali via PacketFence-users <pac...@li...> Sent: Friday, August 30, 2024 11:30 AM To: pac...@li... <pac...@li...>; Jori Luoto via PacketFence-users <pac...@li...> Cc: Md Amer Ali <MA...@c-...> Subject: [PacketFence-users] Radius authentication for Meraki EXTERNAL Exercise Caution I'm Trying to setup captive portal with dynamic preshare key for Meraki. while testing radius connectivity to packetfence server from Meraki and see below error message on packetfence logs. I'm stuck here, is there something that i might be missing. Can someone advice on this Aug 30 17:59:12 packetfence auth[457184]: (6119) Rejected in post-auth: [0050569304ac] (from client 172.26.9.151/32 port 0 cli 00:50:56:93:04:ac) Aug 30 17:59:12 packetfence auth[457184]: (6119) Login incorrect (rest: Server returned:): [0050569304ac] (from client 172.26.9.151/32 port 0 cli 00:50:56:93:04:ac) Aug 30 17:59:12 packetfence auth[457184]: (6120) rest: ERROR: Server returned: Aug 30 17:59:12 packetfence auth[457184]: (6120) rest: ERROR: {"Reply-Message":"Switch is not managed by PacketFence","control:PacketFence-Request-Time":1725020952,"control:PacketFence-Authorization-Status":"allow"} Aug 30 17:59:12 packetfence auth[457184]: (6120) Rejected in post-auth: [0050569304ac] (from client 172.26.9.153/32 port 0 cli 00:50:56:93:04:ac) Aug 30 17:59:12 packetfence auth[457184]: (6120) Login incorrect (rest: Server returned:): [0050569304ac] (from client 172.26.9.153/32 port 0 cli 00:50:56:93:04:ac) Aug 30 17:59:13 packetfence auth[457184]: (6121) rest: ERROR: Server returned: Aug 30 17:59:13 packetfence auth[457184]: (6121) rest: ERROR: {"control:PacketFence-Authorization-Status":"allow","control:PacketFence-Request-Time":1725020953,"Reply-Message":"Switch is not managed by PacketFence"} Aug 30 17:59:13 packetfence auth[457184]: (6121) Rejected in post-auth: [0050569304ac] (from client 172.26.9.152/32 port 0 cli 00:50:56:93:04:ac) Aug 30 17:59:13 packetfence auth[457184]: (6121) Login incorrect (rest: Server returned:): [0050569304ac] (from client 172.26.9.152/32 port 0 cli 00:50:56:93:04:ac) root@packetfence:~# sudo systemctl status freeradius Regards, Md Amer Ali | Network Engineer M: +91.9885767651 | Construction Specialties | www.c -sgroup.com<http://www.c-sgroup.com/> Working Hours (IST):- 01:00 PM – 10:00 PM [cid:8af5e166-eecf-49ca-b1fb-9c978683bc0d] -- This message (including any attachments) is intended only for the use of the individual or entity to which it is addressed and may contain information that is non-public, proprietary, privileged, confidential, and exempt from disclosure under applicable law. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any use, dissemination, distribution, or copying of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us and destroy this message immediately. --- |
From: Goimard, J. <jeg...@ak...> - 2024-09-03 13:12:58
|
Hi Jori, PacketFence V14.0 has NOT been released yet. It is our Devel and is currently under testing phase. So, instruction have not been released too. I think that you point has already been updated https://github.com/inverse-inc/packetfence/commit/dc37be16fb91a7e59fe19242b512b7c1d18c5bd3 If I am wrong please check if an issue has not been already open and if not open one with you modifications. Thank you Regards Jeremy Goimard Senior Software Engineer [signature_117474225] Office: +1 613 670 8438 Akamai Technologies - Inverse 145 Broadway Cambridge, MA 02142 Connect with Us: [signature_1388875202]<https://community.akamai.com/> [signature_3364560605] <http://blogs.akamai.com/> [signature_2499095976] <https://twitter.com/akamai> [signature_3425345268] <http://www.facebook.com/AkamaiTechnologies> [signature_4082763092] <http://www.linkedin.com/company/akamai-technologies> [signature_1928680685] <http://www.youtube.com/user/akamaitechnologies?feature=results_main> ________________________________ From: Jori Luoto <out...@ou...> on behalf of Jori Luoto <jo...@lu...> Sent: Tuesday, September 3, 2024 4:29:55 AM To: pac...@li... Cc: Goimard, Jeremy Subject: VS: [PacketFence-users] Need help ASAP While installing 14. 0 version to Debian 12: W: http: //inverse. ca/downloads/PacketFence/debian/14. 0/dists/bookworm/InRelease: Key is stored in legacy trusted. gpg keyring (/etc/apt/trusted. gpg), see the DEPRECATION section in apt-key(8) for details. ZjQcmQRYFpfptBannerStart This Message Is From an Untrusted Sender You have not previously corresponded with this sender. ZjQcmQRYFpfptBannerEnd While installing 14.0 version to Debian 12: W: http://inverse.ca/downloads/PacketFence/debian/14.0/dists/bookworm/InRelease: Key is stored in legacy trusted.gpg keyring (/etc/apt/trusted.gpg), see the DEPRECATION section in apt-key(8) for details. Terveisin -jori luoto- ________________________________ Lähettäjä: Goimard, Jeremy via PacketFence-users <pac...@li...> Lähetetty: torstai 22. elokuuta 2024 18.58 Vastaanottaja: pac...@li... <pac...@li...> Kopio: Goimard, Jeremy <jeg...@ak...> Aihe: Re: [PacketFence-users] Need help ASAP Hi Chris, REL9 is not supported. Only REL8 or Debian11 (Debian 12 will be for 14.0) No date/PF_Version for REL9, yet Regards Jeremy Goimard Software Engineer [signature_117474225] Office: +1 613 670 8438 Akamai Technologies - Inverse 145 Broadway Cambridge, MA 02142 Connect with Us: [signature_1388875202]<https://community.akamai.com/> [signature_3364560605] <http://blogs.akamai.com/> [signature_2499095976] <https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://twitter.com/akamai__;!!GjvTz_vk!XIqWmQwM9gMVN7bvWu6aLZem21Ks-dwVQDAypDo3jfFNsFMui8VHiSUIkwmOYcDUIGPFZ9UR7A_J$> [signature_3425345268] <https://urldefense.com/v3/__http://www.facebook.com/AkamaiTechnologies__;!!GjvTz_vk!XIqWmQwM9gMVN7bvWu6aLZem21Ks-dwVQDAypDo3jfFNsFMui8VHiSUIkwmOYcDUIGPFZ5ANWbtb$> [signature_4082763092] <https://urldefense.com/v3/__http://www.linkedin.com/company/akamai-technologies__;!!GjvTz_vk!XIqWmQwM9gMVN7bvWu6aLZem21Ks-dwVQDAypDo3jfFNsFMui8VHiSUIkwmOYcDUIGPFZ3frs2gB$> [signature_1928680685] <https://urldefense.com/v3/__http://www.youtube.com/user/akamaitechnologies?feature=results_main__;!!GjvTz_vk!XIqWmQwM9gMVN7bvWu6aLZem21Ks-dwVQDAypDo3jfFNsFMui8VHiSUIkwmOYcDUIGPFZ_RcR380$> ________________________________ From: Christopher Gilimete via PacketFence-users <pac...@li...> Sent: Thursday, August 22, 2024 12:38:09 AM To: pac...@li... Cc: Christopher Gilimete Subject: [PacketFence-users] Need help ASAP Can anyone help me with my packetfence install? I get this message everytime i try to install packetfence. Thank you. Chris G. yum install --enablerepo=packetfence packetfence PacketFence Repository ZjQcmQRYFpfptBannerStart This Message Is From an External Sender This message came from outside your organization. ZjQcmQRYFpfptBannerEnd Can anyone help me with my packetfence install? I get this message everytime i try to install packetfence. Thank you. Chris G. yum install --enablerepo=packetfence packetfence PacketFence Repository 314 B/s | 317 B 00:01 Errors during downloading metadata for repository 'packetfence': - Status code: 404 for http://inverse.ca/downloads/PacketFence/RHEL9/12.2/x86_64/repodata/repomd.xml (IP: 192.95.20.194) Error: Failed to download metadata for repo 'packetfence': Cannot download repomd.xml: Cannot download repodata/repomd.xml: All mirrors were tried |
From: Goimard, J. <jeg...@ak...> - 2024-09-03 12:55:00
|
Hi Romy, I had that one too https://github.com/inverse-inc/packetfence/issues/8105#issuecomment-2090621697 I think that one should have been fixed in that commit https://github.com/inverse-inc/packetfence/commit/52248bd53bac6a51ee38b4b0dffa108a1d1c0071 I just check and it has NOT been backported to maintenance. I will do it. It will be in the next iteration. Thanks for report. Regards Jeremy Goimard Senior Software Engineer [signature_117474225] Office: +1 613 670 8438 Akamai Technologies - Inverse 145 Broadway Cambridge, MA 02142 Connect with Us: [signature_1388875202]<https://community.akamai.com/> [signature_3364560605] <http://blogs.akamai.com/> [signature_2499095976] <https://twitter.com/akamai> [signature_3425345268] <http://www.facebook.com/AkamaiTechnologies> [signature_4082763092] <http://www.linkedin.com/company/akamai-technologies> [signature_1928680685] <http://www.youtube.com/user/akamaitechnologies?feature=results_main> ________________________________ From: Andres, Romy <rom...@ib...> Sent: Tuesday, September 3, 2024 6:27 AM To: Goimard, Jeremy; pac...@li... Subject: AW: PF 13.1 Error on import Hi Jeremy, Thanks for your reply. It took some time, but now I have a newly set up Packetfence server version 13. 2. The commands: curl https: //patch-diff. githubusercontent. com/raw/inverse-inc/packetfence/pull/8193. diff | patch -p1 --dry-run ZjQcmQRYFpfptBannerStart This Message Is From an External Sender This message came from outside your organization. ZjQcmQRYFpfptBannerEnd Hi Jeremy, Thanks for your reply. It took some time, but now I have a newly set up Packetfence server version 13.2. The commands: curl https://patch-diff.githubusercontent.com/raw/inverse-inc/packetfence/pull/8193.diff<https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://patch-diff.githubusercontent.com/raw/inverse-inc/packetfence/pull/8193.diff__;!!GjvTz_vk!VAgvnL-FCQh61PbXFS-0JUfCWDFoGNeGgIHKr4QTD6zOFVys6jr5WxoMfYbE6eDAIM-RJWmMbEeBF8SgkOiNQOyiHGZFyg$> | patch -p1 --dry-run and curl https://patch-diff.githubusercontent.com/raw/inverse-inc/packetfence/pull/8193.diff<https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://patch-diff.githubusercontent.com/raw/inverse-inc/packetfence/pull/8193.diff__;!!GjvTz_vk!VAgvnL-FCQh61PbXFS-0JUfCWDFoGNeGgIHKr4QTD6zOFVys6jr5WxoMfYbE6eDAIM-RJWmMbEeBF8SgkOiNQOyiHGZFyg$> | patch -p1 went through fine. There is a new problem with the import. Here is the output of the command: --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- root@packet2:/home/ibmt# /usr/local/pf/addons/full-import/import.sh -f /home/ibmt/pk1-export_21082024-1.tgz /tmp/tmp.NZ3gWAAeWf /home/ibmt ================================================================================= Extracting archive... Found the following content in the archive: insgesamt 345736 -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 256 21. Aug 11:45 add_files.txt -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 1225 21. Aug 11:45 grants.sql -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 2985019 21. Aug 00:30 packetfence-db-dump-2024-08-21_00h30.sql.gz -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 174675478 21. Aug 00:30 packetfence-files-dump-2024-08-21_00h30.tgz -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 1630 21. Aug 11:45 stored_config_files.txt drwxr-xr-x 3 root root 4096 21. Aug 11:45 usr ================================================================================= Found files dump 'packetfence-files-dump-2024-08-21_00h30.tgz' Extracting files dump ================================================================================= Found compressed database dump 'packetfence-db-dump-2024-08-21_00h30.sql.gz' Uncompressed database dump 'packetfence-db-dump-2024-08-21_00h30.sql' ================================================================================= Get PF version in PacketFence export 13.2.0 ================================================================================= Stopping PacketFence services Synchronizing state of monit.service with SysV service script with /lib/systemd/systemd-sysv-install. Executing: /lib/systemd/systemd-sysv-install disable monit ================================================================================= The database dump uses mysqldump --------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Recreating database pf --------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Dump file was made without triggers and procedures Importing bare schema for 13.2 --------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Replacing create statements from the dump and removing drop statements --------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Importing packetfence-db-dump-2024-08-21_00h30.sql into pf ERROR 1062 (23000) at line 1239: Duplicate entry '1' for key 'PRIMARY' Cleaning temporary directory ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Can you please help again? Thank you very much for your efforts. best regards Romy -- Verwaltung IT Fraunhofer Institut für Biomedizinische Technik Mailing address: Joseph-von-Fraunhofer-Weg 1 66280 Sulzbach Germany Visiting address: Ensheimer Straße 48 66386 St.Ingbert Germany phone: 0049 6897 9071 412 email: rom...@ib...<mailto:rom...@ib...> http://www.ibmt.fraunhofer.de<https://urldefense.com/v3/__http://www.ibmt.fraunhofer.de/__;!!GjvTz_vk!VAgvnL-FCQh61PbXFS-0JUfCWDFoGNeGgIHKr4QTD6zOFVys6jr5WxoMfYbE6eDAIM-RJWmMbEeBF8SgkOiNQOwm7nuXQA$> Von: Goimard, Jeremy <jeg...@ak...> Gesendet: Donnerstag, 27. Juni 2024 16:53 An: pac...@li... Cc: Andres, Romy <rom...@ib...> Betreff: Re: PF 13.1 Error on import Hi Romy, Long story: a PR has been introduce in 13.1 (https://github.com/inverse-inc/packetfence/pull/7754<https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://github.com/inverse-inc/packetfence/pull/7754__;!!GjvTz_vk!VAgvnL-FCQh61PbXFS-0JUfCWDFoGNeGgIHKr4QTD6zOFVys6jr5WxoMfYbE6eDAIM-RJWmMbEeBF8SgkOiNQOyspuLNvA$>) and we opened a ticket about that issue (https://github.com/inverse-inc/packetfence/issues/8105<https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://github.com/inverse-inc/packetfence/issues/8105__;!!GjvTz_vk!VAgvnL-FCQh61PbXFS-0JUfCWDFoGNeGgIHKr4QTD6zOFVys6jr5WxoMfYbE6eDAIM-RJWmMbEeBF8SgkOiNQOwUXFKjgg$>) and a PR (https://github.com/inverse-inc/packetfence/pull/8106<https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://github.com/inverse-inc/packetfence/pull/8106__;!!GjvTz_vk!VAgvnL-FCQh61PbXFS-0JUfCWDFoGNeGgIHKr4QTD6zOFVys6jr5WxoMfYbE6eDAIM-RJWmMbEeBF8SgkOiNQOzs9Mu2Xw$>) that fix the import from 13.1 to 13.2. We also provide first a fix for 13.1 to 13.2 and a new PR is waiting for the previous version: https://github.com/inverse-inc/packetfence/pull/8193<https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://github.com/inverse-inc/packetfence/pull/8193__;!!GjvTz_vk!VAgvnL-FCQh61PbXFS-0JUfCWDFoGNeGgIHKr4QTD6zOFVys6jr5WxoMfYbE6eDAIM-RJWmMbEeBF8SgkOiNQOzo2RE16A$> Short story: - for packetfence-export before 13.1, files are saved under /usr/local/pf - for packetfence-export after 13.1 (included), files are saved in ./ So, - import a exported file from 13.1 or before, in 13.1 or 13.2 will not work. - import a exported file from 13.1 in 13.2 should work To apply the fix until PR#8193 is merged and backported to 13.1 and 13.2 maintenance branches, you need to apply that patch with the following command lines: ``` cd /usr/local/pf/ curl https://patch-diff.githubusercontent.com/raw/inverse-inc/packetfence/pull/8193.diff<https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://patch-diff.githubusercontent.com/raw/inverse-inc/packetfence/pull/8193.diff__;!!GjvTz_vk!VAgvnL-FCQh61PbXFS-0JUfCWDFoGNeGgIHKr4QTD6zOFVys6jr5WxoMfYbE6eDAIM-RJWmMbEeBF8SgkOiNQOyiHGZFyg$> | patch -p1 --dry-run ``` if fine then: ``` cd /usr/local/pf/ curl https://patch-diff.githubusercontent.com/raw/inverse-inc/packetfence/pull/8193.diff<https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://patch-diff.githubusercontent.com/raw/inverse-inc/packetfence/pull/8193.diff__;!!GjvTz_vk!VAgvnL-FCQh61PbXFS-0JUfCWDFoGNeGgIHKr4QTD6zOFVys6jr5WxoMfYbE6eDAIM-RJWmMbEeBF8SgkOiNQOyiHGZFyg$> | patch -p1 ``` Then do the importation. Thanks for your feedback. Regards Jeremy Goimard Software Engineer [signature_117474225] Office: +1 613 670 8438 Akamai Technologies - Inverse 145 Broadway Cambridge, MA 02142 Connect with Us: [signature_1388875202]<https://community.akamai.com/> [signature_3364560605] <http://blogs.akamai.com/> [signature_2499095976] <https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://twitter.com/akamai__;!!GjvTz_vk!VAgvnL-FCQh61PbXFS-0JUfCWDFoGNeGgIHKr4QTD6zOFVys6jr5WxoMfYbE6eDAIM-RJWmMbEeBF8SgkOiNQOw0s9l2DA$> [signature_3425345268] <https://urldefense.com/v3/__http://www.facebook.com/AkamaiTechnologies__;!!GjvTz_vk!VAgvnL-FCQh61PbXFS-0JUfCWDFoGNeGgIHKr4QTD6zOFVys6jr5WxoMfYbE6eDAIM-RJWmMbEeBF8SgkOiNQOzbHqkqmA$> [signature_4082763092] <https://urldefense.com/v3/__http://www.linkedin.com/company/akamai-technologies__;!!GjvTz_vk!VAgvnL-FCQh61PbXFS-0JUfCWDFoGNeGgIHKr4QTD6zOFVys6jr5WxoMfYbE6eDAIM-RJWmMbEeBF8SgkOiNQOxWGX8B3w$> [signature_1928680685] <https://urldefense.com/v3/__http://www.youtube.com/user/akamaitechnologies?feature=results_main__;!!GjvTz_vk!VAgvnL-FCQh61PbXFS-0JUfCWDFoGNeGgIHKr4QTD6zOFVys6jr5WxoMfYbE6eDAIM-RJWmMbEeBF8SgkOiNQOyjqsTKUQ$> ________________________________ From: Andres, Romy via PacketFence-users <pac...@li...<mailto:pac...@li...>> Sent: Wednesday, June 26, 2024 6:33:21 AM To: pac...@li...<mailto:pac...@li...> Cc: Andres, Romy Subject: [PacketFence-users] PF 13.1 Error on import Hello everyone, With the command /usr/local/pf/addons/full-import/export.sh we successfully create an export file. When importing this file on another Packetfence server (version 13.1) with /usr/local/pf/addons/full-import/import.sh -f the following error occurs: Get PF version in PacketFence export grep: /tmp/tmp.JjkJJJKAA3b/usr/local/pf/conf/pf-release: File or directory not found How can the export file be imported successfully? Are there special options to set for export? Thanks in advance for your help. Romy |
From: Andres, R. <rom...@ib...> - 2024-09-03 10:43:48
|
Hi Jeremy, Thanks for your reply. It took some time, but now I have a newly set up Packetfence server version 13.2. The commands: curl https://patch-diff.githubusercontent.com/raw/inverse-inc/packetfence/pull/8193.diff | patch -p1 --dry-run and curl https://patch-diff.githubusercontent.com/raw/inverse-inc/packetfence/pull/8193.diff | patch -p1 went through fine. There is a new problem with the import. Here is the output of the command: --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- root@packet2:/home/ibmt# /usr/local/pf/addons/full-import/import.sh -f /home/ibmt/pk1-export_21082024-1.tgz /tmp/tmp.NZ3gWAAeWf /home/ibmt ================================================================================= Extracting archive... Found the following content in the archive: insgesamt 345736 -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 256 21. Aug 11:45 add_files.txt -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 1225 21. Aug 11:45 grants.sql -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 2985019 21. Aug 00:30 packetfence-db-dump-2024-08-21_00h30.sql.gz -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 174675478 21. Aug 00:30 packetfence-files-dump-2024-08-21_00h30.tgz -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 1630 21. Aug 11:45 stored_config_files.txt drwxr-xr-x 3 root root 4096 21. Aug 11:45 usr ================================================================================= Found files dump 'packetfence-files-dump-2024-08-21_00h30.tgz' Extracting files dump ================================================================================= Found compressed database dump 'packetfence-db-dump-2024-08-21_00h30.sql.gz' Uncompressed database dump 'packetfence-db-dump-2024-08-21_00h30.sql' ================================================================================= Get PF version in PacketFence export 13.2.0 ================================================================================= Stopping PacketFence services Synchronizing state of monit.service with SysV service script with /lib/systemd/systemd-sysv-install. Executing: /lib/systemd/systemd-sysv-install disable monit ================================================================================= The database dump uses mysqldump --------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Recreating database pf --------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Dump file was made without triggers and procedures Importing bare schema for 13.2 --------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Replacing create statements from the dump and removing drop statements --------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Importing packetfence-db-dump-2024-08-21_00h30.sql into pf ERROR 1062 (23000) at line 1239: Duplicate entry '1' for key 'PRIMARY' Cleaning temporary directory ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Can you please help again? Thank you very much for your efforts. best regards Romy -- Verwaltung IT Fraunhofer Institut für Biomedizinische Technik Mailing address: Joseph-von-Fraunhofer-Weg 1 66280 Sulzbach Germany Visiting address: Ensheimer Straße 48 66386 St.Ingbert Germany phone: 0049 6897 9071 412 email: rom...@ib...<mailto:rom...@ib...> http://www.ibmt.fraunhofer.de<http://www.ibmt.fraunhofer.de/> Von: Goimard, Jeremy <jeg...@ak...> Gesendet: Donnerstag, 27. Juni 2024 16:53 An: pac...@li... Cc: Andres, Romy <rom...@ib...> Betreff: Re: PF 13.1 Error on import Hi Romy, Long story: a PR has been introduce in 13.1 (https://github.com/inverse-inc/packetfence/pull/7754) and we opened a ticket about that issue (https://github.com/inverse-inc/packetfence/issues/8105) and a PR (https://github.com/inverse-inc/packetfence/pull/8106) that fix the import from 13.1 to 13.2. We also provide first a fix for 13.1 to 13.2 and a new PR is waiting for the previous version: https://github.com/inverse-inc/packetfence/pull/8193 Short story: - for packetfence-export before 13.1, files are saved under /usr/local/pf - for packetfence-export after 13.1 (included), files are saved in ./ So, - import a exported file from 13.1 or before, in 13.1 or 13.2 will not work. - import a exported file from 13.1 in 13.2 should work To apply the fix until PR#8193 is merged and backported to 13.1 and 13.2 maintenance branches, you need to apply that patch with the following command lines: ``` cd /usr/local/pf/ curl https://patch-diff.githubusercontent.com/raw/inverse-inc/packetfence/pull/8193.diff | patch -p1 --dry-run ``` if fine then: ``` cd /usr/local/pf/ curl https://patch-diff.githubusercontent.com/raw/inverse-inc/packetfence/pull/8193.diff | patch -p1 ``` Then do the importation. Thanks for your feedback. Regards Jeremy Goimard Software Engineer [signature_117474225] Office: +1 613 670 8438 Akamai Technologies - Inverse 145 Broadway Cambridge, MA 02142 Connect with Us: [signature_1388875202]<https://community.akamai.com/> [signature_3364560605] <http://blogs.akamai.com/> [signature_2499095976] <https://twitter.com/akamai> [signature_3425345268] <http://www.facebook.com/AkamaiTechnologies> [signature_4082763092] <http://www.linkedin.com/company/akamai-technologies> [signature_1928680685] <http://www.youtube.com/user/akamaitechnologies?feature=results_main> ________________________________ From: Andres, Romy via PacketFence-users <pac...@li...<mailto:pac...@li...>> Sent: Wednesday, June 26, 2024 6:33:21 AM To: pac...@li...<mailto:pac...@li...> Cc: Andres, Romy Subject: [PacketFence-users] PF 13.1 Error on import Hello everyone, With the command /usr/local/pf/addons/full-import/export.sh we successfully create an export file. When importing this file on another Packetfence server (version 13.1) with /usr/local/pf/addons/full-import/import.sh -f the following error occurs: Get PF version in PacketFence export grep: /tmp/tmp.JjkJJJKAA3b/usr/local/pf/conf/pf-release: File or directory not found How can the export file be imported successfully? Are there special options to set for export? Thanks in advance for your help. Romy |
From: Jori L. <jo...@lu...> - 2024-09-03 08:30:12
|
While installing 14.0 version to Debian 12: W: http://inverse.ca/downloads/PacketFence/debian/14.0/dists/bookworm/InRelease: Key is stored in legacy trusted.gpg keyring (/etc/apt/trusted.gpg), see the DEPRECATION section in apt-key(8) for details. Terveisin -jori luoto- ________________________________ Lähettäjä: Goimard, Jeremy via PacketFence-users <pac...@li...> Lähetetty: torstai 22. elokuuta 2024 18.58 Vastaanottaja: pac...@li... <pac...@li...> Kopio: Goimard, Jeremy <jeg...@ak...> Aihe: Re: [PacketFence-users] Need help ASAP Hi Chris, REL9 is not supported. Only REL8 or Debian11 (Debian 12 will be for 14.0) No date/PF_Version for REL9, yet Regards Jeremy Goimard Software Engineer [signature_117474225] Office: +1 613 670 8438 Akamai Technologies - Inverse 145 Broadway Cambridge, MA 02142 Connect with Us: [signature_1388875202]<https://community.akamai.com/> [signature_3364560605] <http://blogs.akamai.com/> [signature_2499095976] <https://twitter.com/akamai> [signature_3425345268] <http://www.facebook.com/AkamaiTechnologies> [signature_4082763092] <http://www.linkedin.com/company/akamai-technologies> [signature_1928680685] <http://www.youtube.com/user/akamaitechnologies?feature=results_main> ________________________________ From: Christopher Gilimete via PacketFence-users <pac...@li...> Sent: Thursday, August 22, 2024 12:38:09 AM To: pac...@li... Cc: Christopher Gilimete Subject: [PacketFence-users] Need help ASAP Can anyone help me with my packetfence install? I get this message everytime i try to install packetfence. Thank you. Chris G. yum install --enablerepo=packetfence packetfence PacketFence Repository ZjQcmQRYFpfptBannerStart This Message Is From an External Sender This message came from outside your organization. ZjQcmQRYFpfptBannerEnd Can anyone help me with my packetfence install? I get this message everytime i try to install packetfence. Thank you. Chris G. yum install --enablerepo=packetfence packetfence PacketFence Repository 314 B/s | 317 B 00:01 Errors during downloading metadata for repository 'packetfence': - Status code: 404 for http://inverse.ca/downloads/PacketFence/RHEL9/12.2/x86_64/repodata/repomd.xml (IP: 192.95.20.194) Error: Failed to download metadata for repo 'packetfence': Cannot download repomd.xml: Cannot download repodata/repomd.xml: All mirrors were tried |
From: FLÁVIO S. <adm...@gm...> - 2024-09-02 23:43:20
|
Boa noite. Quem já usa o packetfence de forma que um usuário externo fornece seu e-mail e o packetfence manda para o e-mail do usuário as credenciais de acesso? Tentei configurar o servidor de e-mail da minha rede para mandar notificações sobre o funcionamento do packetfence para meu e-mail e não funcionou. Vem uma mensagem de caracteres de senha não reconhecidos. A senha é do usuário criado no servidor de e-mail para envio de mensagem para o meu e-mail, mensagens sobre ocorrências no servidor de packetfence. Então, estou com 2 problema como vcs podem ver aí em cima. Alguém pode ajudar? |
From: Guilherme A. <gui...@ad...> - 2024-09-02 18:03:04
|
Hello. I hope this time I am clearer! The idea of the project is as follows: To make it so that when a client connects to my branch's guest network, they are redirected to a captive portal and, if authentication is successful, access is granted. Our scenario is as follows: We have two companies, one being the branch and the other our headquarters. We have an instance of Packetfence installed at the headquarters and serving as a captive portal for the guest networks. In the current configuration of our headquarters, Packetfence serves as a gateway for our guest networks and authentication works perfectly both via LDAP and via SMS. Our difficulty is as follows: We have already managed to make a RADIUS connection between the FortiGate at our branch and the Packetfence at the headquarters. The connection is successful. We configured the FortiGate as a Switch in Packetfence and created an Authentication Source. However, when we try to perform a user test on FortiGate, the following error always returns: "Authentication failed on PacketFence". The idea of our project is not to configure VLANs for registration, isolation and production, but rather for Packetfence to authenticate users via captive portal, using authentication via RADIUS, LDAP, E-mail and SMS and forward this to FortiGate. The VPN I mentioned earlier is only for business-to-business connections and not an SSLVPN connection. Atenciosamente, [cid:image001.jpg@01DAFD49.2D625570] De: Aaron Zuercher via PacketFence-users <pac...@li...> Enviada: quarta-feira, 28 de agosto de 2024 15:59 Para: Mark Amber <ma...@sp...> Cc: Aaron Zuercher <aar...@gm...>; pac...@li... Assunto: Re: [PacketFence-users] Authentication PacketFence + Radius + FortiGate Mark, You are correct about RSSO roles/groups working on Fortigate. We have that part working but I needed more granular controls for a select user and tried to setup a policy for just that. One work around you mention would be making groups for individual users, I just worked around it by setting a dhcp reservation on that particular device and setting my policy for that IP. Aaron On Wed, Aug 28, 2024 at 9:36 AM Mark Amber <ma...@sp...<mailto:ma...@sp...>> wrote: I am also not clear on exactly the desired setup, perhaps respond to this message with a goal rather than what you did. As for fortigate SSO, you create Roles and use those roles in user policies on the ftg. Wouldn’t you want this anyways instead of making policies for individual users? You could always make a role for each individual user that needs to have a specific policy. The setup is fairly straightforward using the RSSO external connector within security fabric, and a couple things on the command line/config. I can expand on this when I have time, if you are still interested. For me, I created some specific groups and created corresponding RSSO groups on the FTG. I setup an LDAP authentication source and authentication rules to grant PF roles based on memberOf equals conditions. I found it useful to cascade the rules starting with higher privilege first, in case a user is a member of both high and low privilege groups. This could be used for The thing I don’t think people are understanding is your comment about VPN. If you are having users use the Forticlient anyways, and authenticating using LDAP, then you can develop far more user friendly and granular rules directly in fortigate. You can also splurge for their EMS product and get SSO over IPsec vpn and more metrics like group policy and antivirus enforcement. If you are using the VPN fortigate can do this natively. I just don’t understand why this VPN is part of the problem domain yet. Maybe if you elaborated we could help better. -- Mark Amber ________________________________ From: Aaron Zuercher via PacketFence-users <pac...@li...<mailto:pac...@li...>> Sent: Tuesday, August 27, 2024 2:08:19 PM To: pac...@li...<mailto:pac...@li...> <pac...@li...<mailto:pac...@li...>> Cc: Aaron Zuercher <aar...@gm...<mailto:aar...@gm...>> Subject: Re: [PacketFence-users] Authentication PacketFence + Radius + FortiGate Hello, i'm not sure if I understand your design fully but I know Fortigate doesn't support Radius (RSSO) users in its profiles. Here is a forum thread that explains the problem: https://community.fortinet.com/t5/Support-Forum/Using-RSSO-usernames-in-policies/td-p/11235 I have put in a feature request with Fortigate to add this. If this is affecting you I recommend contacting Fortinet to add support to this feature request. Aaron On Wed, Aug 21, 2024 at 2:41 PM Guilherme Assis via PacketFence-users <pac...@li...<mailto:pac...@li...>> wrote: Hello everyone. Can you help me with a configuration? I am working on a deployment that requires integrating my FortiGate Firewall with Packetfence RADIUS. The idea is to have clients connect to my Wi-Fi network through a Site-To-Site VPN to authenticate via Captive Portal and RADIUS return whether the user was authorized or not, thus freeing up the client's internet. However, I am having difficulties with this configuration. FortiGate has already managed to connect to RADIUS, but when I create a local user in Packetfence for testing, I am unsuccessful when trying to authenticate. For this configuration to be possible, do I need to synchronize the SSO Firewall? Today I have configured FortiGate in the Switches and SSO Firewall tabs. Another question is how should I create the authentication source for this configuration to work. I appreciate everyone's help! Best regards, [cid:image001.jpg@01DAFD49.2D625570] _______________________________________________ PacketFence-users mailing list Pac...@li...<mailto:Pac...@li...> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/packetfence-users |
From: FLÁVIO S. <adm...@gm...> - 2024-09-01 00:05:41
|
já está funcionando. Como o modo é o INLINE não precisava eu ter colocado ACL na controladora. Em qui., 22 de ago. de 2024 às 08:52, FLÁVIO Silva <adm...@gm...> escreveu: > Text in English (first) and Portuguese (just below the text in English). > Guys, Good morning. > I have a WLC Cisco 8500, IOS 8.5 and a packetfence in debian 11 in a VM > with hypervisor. I have 2 network cards in the VM, 1 management and another > inline layer 2. > I already went to the file /etc/sysctl.conf and uncommented the > line #net.ipv4.ip_forward=1 and then applied the command sysctl -p. In > Config policies, switch group, Role switch , Registration, I put the > redirection ACL for the packetfence portal (the ACL is configured on the > WLC in security, ACLs) and what happens is that the devices that try to > connect to the wireless network do not get the IP. > I have already changed the ACL to authorize any traffic, but it still > doesn't get IP. When I remove the ACL it gets IP and navigation occurs > normally without asking for any authentication. > The WLC is configured according to the packetfence manual for Cisco WLC. > Applying the command sudo tail -f /usr /local/pf/logs/packetfence.log in > CLI packetfence's server I have a message from an endpoint that > is persisting on accessing the captiveportal: "Device is registered and > still on the portal, attempting to release it again: > (captiveportal::PacketFence::DynamicRouting::Module::Root::unknown_state)Aug > 21 15:25:58 vmnac01 httpd.dispatcher-docker-wrapper[79410]: > httpd.dispatcher: Ip2Mac mac for 0.0.0.0 not found sql : no rows in result > set" Can anyone help me resolve this? > > Pessoal, > Bom dia. > Tenho uma WLC Cisco 8500, IOS 8.5 e um packetfence em debian 11 numa VM > com hypervisor. > Estou com 2 placas de rede na VM, 1 management e outra inline layer 2. > Já fui no arquivo /etc/sysctl.conf e descomentei a > linha #net.ipv4.ip_forward=1 e depois apliquei o comando sysctl -p. > Em Políticas de config., switch group, Role switch, Registration, coloco > a ACL de redirecionamento para o portal do packetfence ( a ACL está > configurada na WLC em security, ACLs) e o que acontece ´é que os aparelhos > que tentam se conectar na rede sem fio não pegam IP. > Já mudei a ACL para autorizar qualquer tráfego, mas mesmo assim não pega > IP. > Quando tiro a ACL pega IP e a navegação ocorre normalmente sem pedir > qualquer autenticação. > A WLC está configurada conforme o manual do packetfence para WLC Cisco. > aplicando o comando sudo tail -f /usr/local/pf/logs/packetfence.log tenho > uma mensagem de um endpoint que está persistindo em acessar o portal > cativo: > "Device is registered and still on the portal, attempting to release it > again. > (captiveportal::PacketFence::DynamicRouting::Module::Root::unknown_state) > Aug 21 15:25:58 vmnac01 httpd.dispatcher-docker-wrapper[79410]: > httpd.dispatcher: Ip2Mac mac for 0.0.0.0 not found sql: no rows in result > set" > Alguém pode me ajudar a resolver isso? > |
From: Renato P. <ren...@ho...> - 2024-08-31 04:45:21
|
Hello all, Can anyone help me with MD5 authentication? I need to authenticate some Huawei phones via MD5. Regards, ________________________________ De: Renato Pereira <ren...@ho...> Enviado: sexta-feira, 9 de agosto de 2024 09:18 Para: pac...@li... <pac...@li...> Assunto: RE: MD5 configuration Hello everyone, Someone can help me with this config? Or someone already configuration HUAWEI phone to authentication? ________________________________ De: Renato Pereira <ren...@ho...> Enviado: sexta-feira, 2 de agosto de 2024 15:31 Para: pac...@li... <pac...@li...> Assunto: MD5 configuration Hi All, I'm trying to configure the MD5 to some old phones, I added the user in the file : <username> Cleartext-Password := "password" Under the line that have bob example: #bob Cleartext-Password := "hello" # Reply-Message := "Hello, %{User-Name}" I enabled the plaintext in Configuration --> System Configuration-> Main Configuration -> Advanced. I restarted the 3 nodes (There is a cluster with 3 nodes with the version 13.2) But when I try to connect, I get this message : Module-Failure-Message = "eap_md5: Cleartext-Password is required for EAP-MD5 authentication", Module-Failure-Message = "eap: Failed continuing EAP MD5 (4) session. EAP sub-module failed", Someone have any ideia how can I fix it? |
From: Md A. A. <MA...@c-...> - 2024-08-30 16:30:53
|
I'm Trying to setup captive portal with dynamic preshare key for Meraki. while testing radius connectivity to packetfence server from Meraki and see below error message on packetfence logs. I'm stuck here, is there something that i might be missing. Can someone advice on this Aug 30 17:59:12 packetfence auth[457184]: (6119) Rejected in post-auth: [0050569304ac] (from client 172.26.9.151/32 port 0 cli 00:50:56:93:04:ac) Aug 30 17:59:12 packetfence auth[457184]: (6119) Login incorrect (rest: Server returned:): [0050569304ac] (from client 172.26.9.151/32 port 0 cli 00:50:56:93:04:ac) Aug 30 17:59:12 packetfence auth[457184]: (6120) rest: ERROR: Server returned: Aug 30 17:59:12 packetfence auth[457184]: (6120) rest: ERROR: {"Reply-Message":"Switch is not managed by PacketFence","control:PacketFence-Request-Time":1725020952,"control:PacketFence-Authorization-Status":"allow"} Aug 30 17:59:12 packetfence auth[457184]: (6120) Rejected in post-auth: [0050569304ac] (from client 172.26.9.153/32 port 0 cli 00:50:56:93:04:ac) Aug 30 17:59:12 packetfence auth[457184]: (6120) Login incorrect (rest: Server returned:): [0050569304ac] (from client 172.26.9.153/32 port 0 cli 00:50:56:93:04:ac) Aug 30 17:59:13 packetfence auth[457184]: (6121) rest: ERROR: Server returned: Aug 30 17:59:13 packetfence auth[457184]: (6121) rest: ERROR: {"control:PacketFence-Authorization-Status":"allow","control:PacketFence-Request-Time":1725020953,"Reply-Message":"Switch is not managed by PacketFence"} Aug 30 17:59:13 packetfence auth[457184]: (6121) Rejected in post-auth: [0050569304ac] (from client 172.26.9.152/32 port 0 cli 00:50:56:93:04:ac) Aug 30 17:59:13 packetfence auth[457184]: (6121) Login incorrect (rest: Server returned:): [0050569304ac] (from client 172.26.9.152/32 port 0 cli 00:50:56:93:04:ac) root@packetfence:~# sudo systemctl status freeradius Regards, Md Amer Ali | Network Engineer M: +91.9885767651 | Construction Specialties | www.c -sgroup.com<http://www.c-sgroup.com/> Working Hours (IST):- 01:00 PM – 10:00 PM [cid:8af5e166-eecf-49ca-b1fb-9c978683bc0d] -- This message (including any attachments) is intended only for the use of the individual or entity to which it is addressed and may contain information that is non-public, proprietary, privileged, confidential, and exempt from disclosure under applicable law. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any use, dissemination, distribution, or copying of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us and destroy this message immediately. --- |
From: Md A. A. <MA...@c-...> - 2024-08-30 16:25:46
|
I'm Trying to setup captive portal with dynamic preshare key for Meraki. while testing radius connectivity to packetfence server from Meraki and see below error message on packetfence logs. I'm stuck here, is there something that i might be missing. Can someone advice on this Regards, Md Amer Ali | Network Engineer -- This message (including any attachments) is intended only for the use of the individual or entity to which it is addressed and may contain information that is non-public, proprietary, privileged, confidential, and exempt from disclosure under applicable law. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any use, dissemination, distribution, or copying of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us and destroy this message immediately. --- |
From: Christopher G. <cdg...@gm...> - 2024-08-30 03:30:35
|
Could someone help me out here please? I have successfully installed the packetfence software and configured it correctly. However I have a problem when it comes to the portal. I login and the bar would load for a long while and then it would give me an error. I have a seperate install in a different location and it loads in 5 seconds or less. Please see attached image. Thank you. Chris G. [image: 2024_08_29_15_06_IMG_8719.PNG] [image: 2024_08_29_15_07_IMG_8720.PNG] |
From: 平嘉伟 <jia...@le...> - 2024-08-29 02:25:07
|
Yes, I can do the testing. One more question, if code is working, will this patch available in 11.2? 发件人: Fabrice Durand via PacketFence-users <pac...@li...> 发送时间: 2024年8月28日 21:23 收件人: pac...@li... 抄送: Fabrice Durand <oeu...@gm...> 主题: Re: [PacketFence-users] how to deploy acl via radius attribute 26? Hello Joel, in fact it's not yet implemented in the code. If I do the code , can you test it ? (then it will be part of the code base of PacketFence). Regards Fabrice Le mer. 28 août 2024 à 08:37, 平嘉伟 via PacketFence-users <pac...@li...<mailto:pac...@li...>> a écrit : Hi folks! I have a pf 13.2 installation for wired 802.1x authentication with Huawei 57xx switches. Test-pc: win10 Test-switch-model: Huawei S5720 Test-switch-vrp-verion: V200R011C10SPC600 802.1x authentication and role based vlan assignment working perfectly. Now here is the thing: I define an acl in [switch-group]-[roles]-[OA-MACHINE]-[access-list] for testing. The acl is pretty simple and has been tested with Huawei switch: acl 10001 deny dst-port 3389 meaning: deny if tcp destination port is 3389 after test-machine passed authentication , got correct role[OA-MACHINE] , the radius reply is: [cid:image002.jpg@01DAF9F1.44433260] BUT, there is no ACL info in reply! After digging, I found radius-filter which is capable to send acl by using radius attribute 26-82 [Huawei data-filter], but it is hard to use. On the other hand, [access-list] of [switch-group]-[roles] is much more user-friendly. So, my question is: how to make pf send acl which is predefined in [switch-group]-[roles]-[SOME ROLE]-[access-list] to Huawei switch using radius attribute 26-82[Huawei data-filter]? Any advice is appreciated. Joel. _______________________________________________ PacketFence-users mailing list Pac...@li...<mailto:Pac...@li...> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/packetfence-users |
From: Aaron Z. <aar...@gm...> - 2024-08-28 18:59:24
|
Mark, You are correct about RSSO roles/groups working on Fortigate. We have that part working but I needed more granular controls for a select user and tried to setup a policy for just that. One work around you mention would be making groups for individual users, I just worked around it by setting a dhcp reservation on that particular device and setting my policy for that IP. Aaron On Wed, Aug 28, 2024 at 9:36 AM Mark Amber <ma...@sp...> wrote: > I am also not clear on exactly the desired setup, perhaps respond to this > message with a goal rather than what you did. > > As for fortigate SSO, you create Roles and use those roles in user > policies on the ftg. Wouldn’t you want this anyways instead of making > policies for individual users? You could always make a role for each > individual user that needs to have a specific policy. > > The setup is fairly straightforward using the RSSO external connector > within security fabric, and a couple things on the command line/config. I > can expand on this when I have time, if you are still interested. > > For me, I created some specific groups and created corresponding RSSO > groups on the FTG. I setup an LDAP authentication source and authentication > rules to grant PF roles based on memberOf equals conditions. I found it > useful to cascade the rules starting with higher privilege first, in case a > user is a member of both high and low privilege groups. > > This could be used for > > The thing I don’t think people are understanding is your comment about > VPN. If you are having users use the Forticlient anyways, and > authenticating using LDAP, then you can develop far more user friendly and > granular rules directly in fortigate. You can also splurge for their EMS > product and get SSO over IPsec vpn and more metrics like group policy and > antivirus enforcement. If you are using the VPN fortigate can do this > natively. I just don’t understand why this VPN is part of the problem > domain yet. Maybe if you elaborated we could help better. > > -- > Mark Amber > ------------------------------ > *From:* Aaron Zuercher via PacketFence-users < > pac...@li...> > *Sent:* Tuesday, August 27, 2024 2:08:19 PM > *To:* pac...@li... < > pac...@li...> > *Cc:* Aaron Zuercher <aar...@gm...> > *Subject:* Re: [PacketFence-users] Authentication PacketFence + Radius + > FortiGate > > Hello, > i'm not sure if I understand your design fully but I know Fortigate > doesn't support Radius (RSSO) users in its profiles. Here is a forum > thread that explains the problem: > > > https://community.fortinet.com/t5/Support-Forum/Using-RSSO-usernames-in-policies/td-p/11235 > > > I have put in a feature request with Fortigate to add this. If this is > affecting you I recommend contacting Fortinet to add support to this > feature request. > > > Aaron > > > > > On Wed, Aug 21, 2024 at 2:41 PM Guilherme Assis via PacketFence-users < > pac...@li...> wrote: > > Hello everyone. > > > > Can you help me with a configuration? > > > > I am working on a deployment that requires integrating my FortiGate > Firewall with Packetfence RADIUS. The idea is to have clients connect to my > Wi-Fi network through a Site-To-Site VPN to authenticate via Captive Portal > and RADIUS return whether the user was authorized or not, thus freeing up > the client's internet. However, I am having difficulties with this > configuration. FortiGate has already managed to connect to RADIUS, but when > I create a local user in Packetfence for testing, I am unsuccessful when > trying to authenticate. For this configuration to be possible, do I need to > synchronize the SSO Firewall? Today I have configured FortiGate in the > Switches and SSO Firewall tabs. > > > > Another question is how should I create the authentication source for this > configuration to work. > > > > I appreciate everyone's help! > > > > Best regards, > > > _______________________________________________ > PacketFence-users mailing list > Pac...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/packetfence-users > > |
From: Mark A. <ma...@sp...> - 2024-08-28 15:03:15
|
I am also not clear on exactly the desired setup, perhaps respond to this message with a goal rather than what you did. As for fortigate SSO, you create Roles and use those roles in user policies on the ftg. Wouldn’t you want this anyways instead of making policies for individual users? You could always make a role for each individual user that needs to have a specific policy. The setup is fairly straightforward using the RSSO external connector within security fabric, and a couple things on the command line/config. I can expand on this when I have time, if you are still interested. For me, I created some specific groups and created corresponding RSSO groups on the FTG. I setup an LDAP authentication source and authentication rules to grant PF roles based on memberOf equals conditions. I found it useful to cascade the rules starting with higher privilege first, in case a user is a member of both high and low privilege groups. This could be used for The thing I don’t think people are understanding is your comment about VPN. If you are having users use the Forticlient anyways, and authenticating using LDAP, then you can develop far more user friendly and granular rules directly in fortigate. You can also splurge for their EMS product and get SSO over IPsec vpn and more metrics like group policy and antivirus enforcement. If you are using the VPN fortigate can do this natively. I just don’t understand why this VPN is part of the problem domain yet. Maybe if you elaborated we could help better. -- Mark Amber ________________________________ From: Aaron Zuercher via PacketFence-users <pac...@li...> Sent: Tuesday, August 27, 2024 2:08:19 PM To: pac...@li... <pac...@li...> Cc: Aaron Zuercher <aar...@gm...> Subject: Re: [PacketFence-users] Authentication PacketFence + Radius + FortiGate Hello, i'm not sure if I understand your design fully but I know Fortigate doesn't support Radius (RSSO) users in its profiles. Here is a forum thread that explains the problem: https://community.fortinet.com/t5/Support-Forum/Using-RSSO-usernames-in-policies/td-p/11235 I have put in a feature request with Fortigate to add this. If this is affecting you I recommend contacting Fortinet to add support to this feature request. Aaron On Wed, Aug 21, 2024 at 2:41 PM Guilherme Assis via PacketFence-users <pac...@li...<mailto:pac...@li...>> wrote: Hello everyone. Can you help me with a configuration? I am working on a deployment that requires integrating my FortiGate Firewall with Packetfence RADIUS. The idea is to have clients connect to my Wi-Fi network through a Site-To-Site VPN to authenticate via Captive Portal and RADIUS return whether the user was authorized or not, thus freeing up the client's internet. However, I am having difficulties with this configuration. FortiGate has already managed to connect to RADIUS, but when I create a local user in Packetfence for testing, I am unsuccessful when trying to authenticate. For this configuration to be possible, do I need to synchronize the SSO Firewall? Today I have configured FortiGate in the Switches and SSO Firewall tabs. Another question is how should I create the authentication source for this configuration to work. I appreciate everyone's help! Best regards, [cid:ii_1919537b9a64ce8e91] _______________________________________________ PacketFence-users mailing list Pac...@li...<mailto:Pac...@li...> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/packetfence-users |
From: Fabrice D. <oeu...@gm...> - 2024-08-28 13:23:30
|
Hello Joel, in fact it's not yet implemented in the code. If I do the code , can you test it ? (then it will be part of the code base of PacketFence). Regards Fabrice Le mer. 28 août 2024 à 08:37, 平嘉伟 via PacketFence-users < pac...@li...> a écrit : > Hi folks! > > I have a pf 13.2 installation for wired 802.1x authentication > with Huawei 57xx switches. > > Test-pc: win10 > > Test-switch-model: Huawei S5720 > > Test-switch-vrp-verion: V200R011C10SPC600 > > 802.1x authentication and role based vlan assignment working > perfectly. > > > > Now here is the thing: > > I define an acl in [switch-group]-[roles]-[OA-MACHINE]-[access-list] > for testing. > > The acl is pretty simple and has been tested with Huawei switch: > > acl 10001 deny dst-port 3389 > > meaning: deny if tcp destination port is 3389 > > after test-machine passed authentication , got correct > role[OA-MACHINE] , the radius reply is: > > BUT, there is no ACL info in reply! > > After digging, I found radius-filter which is capable to send acl > by using radius attribute 26-82 [Huawei data-filter], but it is hard to use. > > On the other hand, [access-list] of [switch-group]-[roles] is > much more user-friendly. > > So, my question is: > > how to make pf send acl which is predefined in > [switch-group]-[roles]-[SOME ROLE]-[access-list] to Huawei switch using > radius attribute 26-82[Huawei data-filter]? > > > > Any advice is appreciated. > > > > Joel. > > > _______________________________________________ > PacketFence-users mailing list > Pac...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/packetfence-users > |
From: 平嘉伟 <jia...@le...> - 2024-08-28 07:11:27
|
Hi folks! I have a pf 13.2 installation for wired 802.1x authentication with Huawei 57xx switches. Test-pc: win10 Test-switch-model: Huawei S5720 Test-switch-vrp-verion: V200R011C10SPC600 802.1x authentication and role based vlan assignment working perfectly. Now here is the thing: I define an acl in [switch-group]-[roles]-[OA-MACHINE]-[access-list] for testing. The acl is pretty simple and has been tested with Huawei switch: acl 10001 deny dst-port 3389 meaning: deny if tcp destination port is 3389 after test-machine passed authentication , got correct role[OA-MACHINE] , the radius reply is: [cid:image001.jpg@01DAF95A.B2251B00] BUT, there is no ACL info in reply! After digging, I found radius-filter which is capable to send acl by using radius attribute 26-82 [Huawei data-filter], but it is hard to use. On the other hand, [access-list] of [switch-group]-[roles] is much more user-friendly. So, my question is: how to make pf send acl which is predefined in [switch-group]-[roles]-[SOME ROLE]-[access-list] to Huawei switch using radius attribute 26-82[Huawei data-filter]? Any advice is appreciated. Joel. |
From: Aaron Z. <aar...@gm...> - 2024-08-27 19:08:39
|
Hello, i'm not sure if I understand your design fully but I know Fortigate doesn't support Radius (RSSO) users in its profiles. Here is a forum thread that explains the problem: https://community.fortinet.com/t5/Support-Forum/Using-RSSO-usernames-in-policies/td-p/11235 I have put in a feature request with Fortigate to add this. If this is affecting you I recommend contacting Fortinet to add support to this feature request. Aaron On Wed, Aug 21, 2024 at 2:41 PM Guilherme Assis via PacketFence-users < pac...@li...> wrote: > Hello everyone. > > > > Can you help me with a configuration? > > > > I am working on a deployment that requires integrating my FortiGate > Firewall with Packetfence RADIUS. The idea is to have clients connect to my > Wi-Fi network through a Site-To-Site VPN to authenticate via Captive Portal > and RADIUS return whether the user was authorized or not, thus freeing up > the client's internet. However, I am having difficulties with this > configuration. FortiGate has already managed to connect to RADIUS, but when > I create a local user in Packetfence for testing, I am unsuccessful when > trying to authenticate. For this configuration to be possible, do I need to > synchronize the SSO Firewall? Today I have configured FortiGate in the > Switches and SSO Firewall tabs. > > > > Another question is how should I create the authentication source for this > configuration to work. > > > > I appreciate everyone's help! > > > > Best regards, > > > _______________________________________________ > PacketFence-users mailing list > Pac...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/packetfence-users > |
From: Ndy M. <ndy...@gm...> - 2024-08-23 16:19:58
|
please who can help me to deploy all architecture packetfence with computer on Ovirt virtualization Platform? Le ven. 9 août 2024 à 06:32, MBVIT Info via PacketFence-users < pac...@li...> a écrit : > Hi, > > > > I am looking for people that can help us with installation of PacketFence > and also support. We want to deploy PF for WIFI hotspot management. We have > tried reaching out to inverse inc and there no response on emails and the > phone number on the website does not work. We want to do this on > commercial basis. > > > > Anyone interested can send email to in...@mb... > > > > Regards > > Neani > _______________________________________________ > PacketFence-users mailing list > Pac...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/packetfence-users > |
From: Goimard, J. <jeg...@ak...> - 2024-08-22 15:58:53
|
Hi Chris, REL9 is not supported. Only REL8 or Debian11 (Debian 12 will be for 14.0) No date/PF_Version for REL9, yet Regards Jeremy Goimard Software Engineer [signature_117474225] Office: +1 613 670 8438 Akamai Technologies - Inverse 145 Broadway Cambridge, MA 02142 Connect with Us: [signature_1388875202]<https://community.akamai.com/> [signature_3364560605] <http://blogs.akamai.com/> [signature_2499095976] <https://twitter.com/akamai> [signature_3425345268] <http://www.facebook.com/AkamaiTechnologies> [signature_4082763092] <http://www.linkedin.com/company/akamai-technologies> [signature_1928680685] <http://www.youtube.com/user/akamaitechnologies?feature=results_main> ________________________________ From: Christopher Gilimete via PacketFence-users <pac...@li...> Sent: Thursday, August 22, 2024 12:38:09 AM To: pac...@li... Cc: Christopher Gilimete Subject: [PacketFence-users] Need help ASAP Can anyone help me with my packetfence install? I get this message everytime i try to install packetfence. Thank you. Chris G. yum install --enablerepo=packetfence packetfence PacketFence Repository ZjQcmQRYFpfptBannerStart This Message Is From an External Sender This message came from outside your organization. ZjQcmQRYFpfptBannerEnd Can anyone help me with my packetfence install? I get this message everytime i try to install packetfence. Thank you. Chris G. yum install --enablerepo=packetfence packetfence PacketFence Repository 314 B/s | 317 B 00:01 Errors during downloading metadata for repository 'packetfence': - Status code: 404 for http://inverse.ca/downloads/PacketFence/RHEL9/12.2/x86_64/repodata/repomd.xml (IP: 192.95.20.194) Error: Failed to download metadata for repo 'packetfence': Cannot download repomd.xml: Cannot download repodata/repomd.xml: All mirrors were tried |