From: Timothy R. <tre...@st...> - 2009-09-29 20:49:57
|
I should explain the "probably" word. Protege 3.4 only handles OWL 1.0 so if the ontology that you are saving has some OWL 2.0 constructs these won't be fully understood. What happens in many cases is that Protege 3.4 reads the file but simply does not understand the OWL 2.0 constructs. -Timothy On Tue, 2009-09-29 at 14:15 +0100, Adam Funk wrote: > [29/09/09 13:01] Timothy Redmond wrote: > > The problem is the fact that you saved in owl/xml format. Protege 3.2 > > cannot read this format. Save it in RDF/XML format and you will > > probably succeed. > > Thanks. I'll try saving the ontology in both formats and see if that > solves the problem. > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Come build with us! The BlackBerry® Developer Conference in SF, CA > is the only developer event you need to attend this year. Jumpstart your > developing skills, take BlackBerry mobile applications to market and stay > ahead of the curve. Join us from November 9-12, 2009. Register now! > http://p.sf.net/sfu/devconf > _______________________________________________ > Owlapi-developer mailing list > Owl...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/owlapi-developer |