From: Matthew H. <mat...@cs...> - 2008-03-13 22:22:32
|
Hi Jyoti, > I am new to this forum and wanted to learn something which might > have been asked before: does the OWL API provide support for a > database backend and existing triple store implementations? If yes, > could you please provide me a pointer with more information on this? > If not, is there an expectation to provide such a support in a > future release? It is possible to add a new implementations of the OWLOntology interface - one could imagine that such an implementation could be based on some triple store (e.g. Sesame). In terms of in-memory triple stores then I don't think this makes sense. This is because the OWL API is generally more efficient in terms of memory usage (and load time) than a corresponding triple based API implementation. Cheers, Matthew |