Tanks, with the attached raptor build file and an old version of boost, 1.56.0 isn't working I had to use 1.54.0, I got it to compile. For now the examples in the app directory fail with my .owl files but I will see if I can figure that one out. The error is: http://dpaste.com/31XJ81A
But I can not share the ontology file because of an NDA so I guess I have to figure that one out on my own.
If you would like to refer to this comment somewhere else in this project, copy and paste the following link:
Ok, I have to check if we can do anything about that. I think the .owl file is only owl 1.0 compatible (2002 import statement) where this seems to be legal (ugly in my opinion but who am I to judge the medical guys who created this ontology). Thanks for your quick help.
--Edit
I tried to print classes for this document http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl.rdf
And got an error like this one: http://dpaste.com/1D0H5TX
Am I missing something or should this work?
Last edit: alex 2014-10-02
If you would like to refer to this comment somewhere else in this project, copy and paste the following link:
http://dpaste.com/1VQDVF9
Build for Raptor versions 2.0.1[24] is broken. Please replace owlcpp/external/ext/raptor.jam with the attached. Sorry about this
--Mikhail
Tanks, with the attached raptor build file and an old version of boost, 1.56.0 isn't working I had to use 1.54.0, I got it to compile. For now the examples in the app directory fail with my .owl files but I will see if I can figure that one out. The error is:
http://dpaste.com/31XJ81A
But I can not share the ontology file because of an NDA so I guess I have to figure that one out on my own.
I'll make a fix for Boost 1.56.0. Meanwhile, please use Boost 1.55.0 or earlier.
The error that you get, "http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#NoObject", "unknown term in standard namespace" is by design.
Please see http://www.w3.org/TR/2012/REC-owl2-syntax-20121211/
"IRIs with prefixes rdf:, rdfs:, xsd:, and owl: constitute the reserved vocabulary of OWL 2"
Mikhail
Ok, I have to check if we can do anything about that. I think the .owl file is only owl 1.0 compatible (2002 import statement) where this seems to be legal (ugly in my opinion but who am I to judge the medical guys who created this ontology). Thanks for your quick help.
--Edit
I tried to print classes for this document
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl.rdf
And got an error like this one:
http://dpaste.com/1D0H5TX
Am I missing something or should this work?
Last edit: alex 2014-10-02