From: <Chr...@ey...> - 2002-09-24 13:19:14
|
Mark, I think a version of the Filters API implemented as a Servlet 2.3 Filter could be useful, and I have proposed such an implementation on this list in the past. It is something I will work on, but it may not be consistent with the approach we'll take at the outset, which is to create filters to be used at boundaries. My thoughts about using an InterceptorFilter in this context is that it would allow web app administrators to take a declarative approach by mapping request parameters for specific web resources to specific API filter functions. That would mean scrubbing all the input before the Servlet sees it, which is a different approach from filtering at boundaries. I apologize for the email format, but I'm sending this from my work email, as I do not have access to my other mail right now, and Lotus Notes does some annoying things I don't have any control over (the sig and formatting as HTML). Chris Mark Curphey <ma...@cu...> Sent by: owa...@li... 09/22/2002 02:12 AM Please respond to mark To: owa...@li... cc: Subject: [Owasp-input-api-developers] Design Doc I must of become unsubscribed for some reason so wasn't getting mail...sorry about that one. Design doc looks pretty cool. Did you decide on a 2nd initial language ? I see a great deal of C CGI still around. I saw Steves PHP web mail app as well which might be cool. In Java would the implementation be done using the Java Filters package (part of Servlet 2.3 spec) ? http://java.sun.com/j2ee/sdk_1.3/techdocs/api/javax/s ervlet/Filter.html I thought this was interesting as well http://java.sun.com/blueprints/patterns/InterceptingF ilter.html ------------------------------------------------------- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf _______________________________________________ Owasp-input-api-developers mailing list Owa...@li... https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/owasp-input-api-developers ________________________________________________________________________ The information contained in this message may be privileged and confidential and protected from disclosure. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, or an employee or agent responsible for delivering this message to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by replying to the message and deleting it from your computer. Thank you. Ernst & Young LLP |
From: Mark C. <ma...@cu...> - 2002-09-24 14:15:07
|
Cheers. On Tue, 2002-09-24 at 06:27, Chr...@ey... wrote: > Mark, > > I think a version of the Filters API implemented as a Servlet 2.3 Filter > could be useful, and I have proposed such an implementation on this list > in the past. It is something I will work on, but it may not be consistent > with the approach we'll take at the outset, which is to create filters to > be used at boundaries. Just my 2 cents worth but I would suggest you chat the the PM (Gabe) and tech lead (Alex) to ensure its in unison with whats been mutually agreed on, to ensure inclusion with the project release files. > > My thoughts about using an InterceptorFilter in this context is that it > would allow web app administrators to take a declarative approach by > mapping request parameters for specific web resources to specific API > filter functions. That would mean scrubbing all the input before the > Servlet sees it, which is a different approach from filtering at > boundaries. > > I apologize for the email format, but I'm sending this from my work email, > as I do not have access to my other mail right now, and Lotus Notes does > some annoying things I don't have any control over (the sig and formatting > as HTML). > > Chris > > > > > > Mark Curphey <ma...@cu...> > Sent by: owa...@li... > 09/22/2002 02:12 AM > Please respond to mark > > > To: owa...@li... > cc: > Subject: [Owasp-input-api-developers] Design Doc > > > I must of become unsubscribed for some reason so > wasn't getting mail...sorry about that one. > > Design doc looks pretty cool. > > Did you decide on a 2nd initial language ? > > I see a great deal of C CGI still around. I saw > Steves PHP web mail app as well which might be cool. > > In Java would the implementation be done using the > Java Filters package (part of Servlet 2.3 spec) ? > > http://java.sun.com/j2ee/sdk_1.3/techdocs/api/javax/s > ervlet/Filter.html > > I thought this was interesting as well > > http://java.sun.com/blueprints/patterns/InterceptingF > ilter.html > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek > Welcome to geek heaven. > http://thinkgeek.com/sf > _______________________________________________ > Owasp-input-api-developers mailing list > Owa...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/owasp-input-api-developers > > > > ________________________________________________________________________ > The information contained in this message may be privileged and confidential and protected from disclosure. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, or an employee or agent responsible for delivering this message to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by replying to the message and deleting it from your computer. Thank you. Ernst & Young LLP |
From: Alex R. <al...@ne...> - 2002-09-24 15:14:33
|
On Tuesday 24 September 2002 02:14, Mark Curphey wrote: > Cheers. > > On Tue, 2002-09-24 at 06:27, Chr...@ey... wrote: > > Mark, > > > > I think a version of the Filters API implemented as a Servlet 2.3 Fil= ter > > could be useful, and I have proposed such an implementation on this l= ist > > in the past. It is something I will work on, but it may not be > > consistent with the approach we'll take at the outset, which is to cr= eate > > filters to be used at boundaries. > > Just my 2 cents worth but I would suggest you chat the the PM (Gabe) an= d > tech lead (Alex) to ensure its in unison with whats been mutually agree= d > on, to ensure inclusion with the project release files. I don't think that putting a filter in a Servlet Filter is a bad idea, bu= t i=20 think that we should recognize that it's only going to cover one boundary= =2E=20 That being the case, I'm all for things that make our tools easier to=20 integrate for developers. --=20 Alex Russell al...@Se... al...@ne... |
From: Gabriel L. <ga...@bu...> - 2002-09-24 16:34:52
|
On Tue, 2002-09-24 at 00:14, Mark Curphey wrote: > Cheers. > > On Tue, 2002-09-24 at 06:27, Chr...@ey... wrote: > > Mark, > > > > I think a version of the Filters API implemented as a Servlet 2.3 Filter > > could be useful, and I have proposed such an implementation on this list > > in the past. It is something I will work on, but it may not be consistent > > with the approach we'll take at the outset, which is to create filters to > > be used at boundaries. > > Just my 2 cents worth but I would suggest you chat the the PM (Gabe) and > tech lead (Alex) to ensure its in unison with whats been mutually agreed > on, to ensure inclusion with the project release files. The idea that Alex and I had discussed in the past was that of a layered approach. That being that the first bit of work we do was more nuts and bolts, and then this could be used to make a more plug and play solution a la servlet filters... So its not out of sync necessarily with what we want to do, but what we are really after is making first tools and then solutions... -gabe -- Gabriel Lawrence CTO Butterfly Security <www.butterflysecurity.com> (408) 333-9948 ga...@bu... |
From: Mark C. <ma...@cu...> - 2002-09-24 16:45:24
|
Cool, just making sure things didn't stray like they did again ;-) ---- Gabriel Lawrence <ga...@bu...> wrote: > On Tue, 2002-09-24 at 00:14, Mark Curphey wrote: > > Cheers. > > > > On Tue, 2002-09-24 at 06:27, Chr...@ey... wrote: > > > Mark, > > > > > > I think a version of the Filters API implemented as a Servlet 2.3 Filter > > > could be useful, and I have proposed such an implementation on this list > > > in the past. It is something I will work on, but it may not be consistent > > > with the approach we'll take at the outset, which is to create filters to > > > be used at boundaries. > > > > Just my 2 cents worth but I would suggest you chat the the PM (Gabe) and > > tech lead (Alex) to ensure its in unison with whats been mutually agreed > > on, to ensure inclusion with the project release files. > > The idea that Alex and I had discussed in the past was that of a layered > approach. That being that the first bit of work we do was more nuts and > bolts, and then this could be used to make a more plug and play solution > a la servlet filters... So its not out of sync necessarily with what we > want to do, but what we are really after is making first tools and then > solutions... > > -gabe > > > -- > Gabriel Lawrence > CTO > Butterfly Security <www.butterflysecurity.com> > (408) 333-9948 > ga...@bu... > > > > --------------------------------------------------- ---- > This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek > Welcome to geek heaven. > http://thinkgeek.com/sf > _______________________________________________ > Owasp-input-api-developers mailing list > Owa...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/owasp- input-api-developers > > |