RE: [Owasp-input-api-developers] Vision Document

[Christopher T. <ch...@ch...>]

If we're going to use the Apache system of voting, then a reasonable
question to ask would be "Who gets to vote?", or more accurately, who gets
veto rights.  And for those of you not familiar with the Apache system, -1's
need to be justified with arguments as to why the
proposal/code/patch/whatever is insufficient.

Regards,
Chris

-----Original Message-----
From: owa...@li...
[mailto:owa...@li...]On Behalf
Of Mark Curphey
Sent: Monday, August 12, 2002 6:21 PM
To: John Percival; Alex Russell;
owa...@so...
Cc: Mark Curphey
Subject: RE: [Owasp-input-api-developers] Vision Document


Good deal.

Looks like the first vote for yes.

What I was talking to Gabe and Alex about is using
the doc as THE vision for the project and everyone
having a vote before the end of this biz week (5pm
Friday Pacific Time) so we can move on and get a
release done. The OWASP portal is being built using
UPortal so we need this ;-)

It seems to (me anyway) make sense that if there are
things you think are missing or its not what you
think we should be doing, then please append the
issue as a voting item and send them out to Gabe
before Wednesday. Gabe can send out a list of all
the items people feel need to be voted on on
Thursday and we can tally votes by Friday night.

I suggest we use the Apache system or a +1, 0 or -1
for each item and add the total. If you don't vote
it don't count so be warned.

Mine is for +1 on the vision document as it stands
with no alterations. I think it sums up what the
project is trying to do and needs to do, even if it
is somewhat off from what has been done to date.

Cheers

---- John Percival <joh...@je...> wrote:
> Hi guys,
>
> I just had a read through, and that doc looks
clear and informative. The
> only thing that I would question, without wanting
to open a can of worms, is
> the choice not to develop for DCOM/.NET
technology. I am not in a position
> to create such filters, but is it our position to
judge what language our
> 'customers' will be using?
>
> On the whole though, good work!
>
> John
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: owasp-input-api-developers-
ad...@li...
> > [mailto:owasp-input-api-developers-
ad...@li...]On Behalf
> > Of Alex Russell
> > Sent: 12 August 2002 18:06
> > To: owa...@so...
> > Cc: Mark Curphey
> > Subject: [Owasp-input-api-developers] Vision
Document
> >
> >
> > Hey Everyone,
> >
> > After much discussion, the project is now
(apparently) stalled. To
> > combat this, Mark Curphey and I have drafted
a "vision document" to
> > outline the purpose of the project and our
preferred approach to
> > development.
> >
> > You'll find the document attached for your
review. Gabe or Mark should
> > be announcing a vote on the document soon, so
it'd be good if everyone
> > were familiar with it's contents before we vote
to adopt it.
> >
> > Thanks,
> >
> > Alex
> >
> > --
> > Alex Russell
> > al...@Se...
> > al...@ne...
> >
>
>
>


-------------------------------------------------------
This sf.net email is sponsored by: Dice - The leading online job board
for high-tech professionals. Search and apply for tech jobs today!
http://seeker.dice.com/seeker.epl?rel_code=31
_______________________________________________
Owasp-input-api-developers mailing list
Owa...@li...
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/owasp-input-api-developers