From: Gabriel L. <ga...@bu...> - 2002-06-27 18:44:15
|
On Thu, 2002-06-27 at 08:00, Alex Russell wrote: > So, to clarify this, are we saying that the toolkit itself should be > flexible (allowing an arbitrarialy complex input syntax, etc) or are we > specifying that it should be atomic enough to be used in flexible ways? > I believe that the answer to this question lies a the heart at some of > our current dissagreement. > > So what do you guys think? Uhhh, am I too demanding to say how 'bout both? Darn, now I really sound like a marketing guy ;-) -gabe |