From: Stephane F. <ste...@in...> - 2004-05-12 14:05:34
|
On Wed, May 12, 2004 at 03:46:35PM +0200, Michel D'Hooge wrote: > Richard S. Hall wrote: >=20 > >> obr -start Logger_0.1 > >> obr -start Logger > > > We can use another character to identify version number (i.e. ; or : or= =20 > whatever sounds nice). >=20 > >I don't really like to encode additional information into the name,=20 > >since we have a separate version attribute. Perhaps in the future when= =20 > >the bundle repository has multiple versions we make this a parameter=20 > >that can be passed in or we require the bundles to have different=20 > >names, like "Log" and "Log Devel". It's a too simplified view of the problem. I have two examples: - I have two identical bundles but they embedded two version of JMX (1.0 = and 2.0). - You send me two different versions of obr... Both are called obr, but interface methods signatures are differents, and it breaks only at run-= time... Of course I can name them differently, but it should be simpler to manage that immediatly. >=20 > I believe that Debian package naming policy is quite complete and well=20 > tested. But we are not that far that we need such a naming tool... Yes, I already have such problems on my inner applications. All bundle managing scheme (rpm, deb, ebuilds) map version to archive names... obr should also do that. I think the earlier the better... /stephane --=20 Stephane Frenot - Associate professor CITI/ARES - INSA lyon - Bat. L=E9onard de Vinci 20, av. A. Einstein - 69621 Villeurbanne Cedex Email: mailto:ste...@in... Web : http://ares.insa-lyon.fr/~sfrenot/ ICQ : 643346 (et oui !) Tel : +33 472 436 422 / +33 617 671 714 ----------------------------------------------------------------- |