Re: [Os2-oorexx-devel] progress...

[Michael L. <ml...@lu...>]

Hi Adrian-

Yup, 'tis the list addy.

Yes, Windows back is probably easier. Windows source seems to be reworked OS/2
source, I've not been in the unix code as much. Going that route would probably
require using those *nix->OS/2 libs which adds another dependency on OS/2...
rather not.

Yes, best to start with ooRexx 3.1 at this point.

Watcom, your call.

Yes, start with rexx.exe ending up on OS/2, but also the RexxAPI ends up being
ported which means cmd.exe can hook it right from the start. Basically rexx.exe
or cmd.exe have about the same code in them, both always hook the dll to crank
up Rexx. I don't see value in undoing that, then to put it back to "normal"
mode.

Michael Lueck
Lueck Data Systems
http://www.lueckdatasystems.com/