Menu
▾
▴
orm-tracker-bugs — This list is notified whenever anything changes on the 'bugs' tracker.
You can subscribe to this list here.
| 2006 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
(6) |
Apr
(13) |
May
(4) |
Jun
(1) |
Jul
(3) |
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
(3) |
Nov
(16) |
Dec
(2) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2007 |
Jan
(11) |
Feb
(10) |
Mar
(7) |
Apr
(11) |
May
|
Jun
(1) |
Jul
(7) |
Aug
(7) |
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
| 2008 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
(4) |
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
(1) |
| 2009 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
(1) |
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
(1) |
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
(1) |
Dec
|
|
From: SourceForge.net <no...@so...> - 2009-11-23 12:15:19
|
Bugs item #2902410, was opened at 2009-11-23 13:15 Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by ralphad You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=809608&aid=2902410&group_id=158881 Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the comment thread, including the initial issue submission, for this request, not just the latest update. Category: None Group: None Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Private: No Submitted By: Adam Ralph (ralphad) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: superfluous 'Missing Mandatory Sample Population' error Initial Comment: A 'Missing Mandatory Sample Population' error is shown for a non-mandatory role. To re-create:- 1. Create a new ORM file. 2. Add the fact - Book(.Name) is reviewed by Person(.Name) 3. Add a uniquness constraint spanning both roles in the fact type. 4. Add a sample population entry to Book of 'War and Peace' You will now see that a 'Missing Mandatory Sample Population' error is shown - 'Model Error: 'Book' instance 'War and Peace' in model 'ORMModel1' must participate in FactType 'BookIsReviewedByPerson'.' Unless I am mistaken, this error should not show because the role is not mandatory. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=809608&aid=2902410&group_id=158881 |
|
From: SourceForge.net <no...@so...> - 2009-08-05 07:36:56
|
Bugs item #2832483, was opened at 2009-08-05 09:36 Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by ralphad You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=809608&aid=2832483&group_id=158881 Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the comment thread, including the initial issue submission, for this request, not just the latest update. Category: None Group: None Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Private: No Submitted By: Adam Ralph (ralphad) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: toolbox items fail when toolbox is undocked Initial Comment: To recreate:- 1) undock the Toolbox from the main VS window 2) drag an Entity Type onto the diagram 3) drag a second Entity Type onto the diagram 4) click the Subtype Connector 5) click one of the Entity Types 6) attempt to click the second Entity Type Symptom: The subtype connector fails to appear. This does not happen when the Toolbox is docked. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=809608&aid=2832483&group_id=158881 |
|
From: SourceForge.net <no...@so...> - 2009-04-06 16:32:30
|
Bugs item #2439860, was opened at 2008-12-17 13:41 Message generated for change (Settings changed) made by ralphad You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=809608&aid=2439860&group_id=158881 Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the comment thread, including the initial issue submission, for this request, not just the latest update. Category: None Group: None >Status: Closed >Resolution: Works For Me Priority: 5 Private: No Submitted By: Adam Ralph (ralphad) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: Dragging a Value Type into a diagram creates an Entity Type Initial Comment: When you drag a 'Value Type' shape from the Toolbox onto a diagram, an 'Enitity Type' shape is created instead of a 'Value Type' shape. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Adam Ralph (ralphad) Date: 2009-04-06 18:32 Message: This appears to have been fixed with release NORMA_VS2008_2009-02CTP ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=809608&aid=2439860&group_id=158881 |
|
From: SourceForge.net <no...@so...> - 2008-12-17 12:41:17
|
Bugs item #2439860, was opened at 2008-12-17 13:41 Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=809608&aid=2439860&group_id=158881 Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the comment thread, including the initial issue submission, for this request, not just the latest update. Category: None Group: None Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Private: No Submitted By: Adam Ralph (ralphad) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: Dragging a Value Type into a diagram creates an Entity Type Initial Comment: When you drag a 'Value Type' shape from the Toolbox onto a diagram, an 'Enitity Type' shape is created instead of a 'Value Type' shape. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=809608&aid=2439860&group_id=158881 |
|
From: SourceForge.net <no...@so...> - 2008-03-07 15:41:17
|
Bugs item #1908322, was opened at 2008-03-05 21:21 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by gandalf_t You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=809608&aid=1908322&group_id=158881 Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the comment thread, including the initial issue submission, for this request, not just the latest update. Category: None Group: None Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Private: No Submitted By: Jos Bol (gandalf_t) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: Relational view showing the type of all fields as bit Initial Comment: After installing VS2008-02CTP for visual studio 2008 and opening the model I created using the previous CTP, the relational view shows the type "bit" for all fields, including the autocounter PK's. When looking at the entities, it seems that everything is ok and that this problem seems to be only in relational view component. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Jos Bol (gandalf_t) Date: 2008-03-07 15:41 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=6658 Originator: YES The nick of the user mentioned inthe previous comment is MarkTab ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Jos Bol (gandalf_t) Date: 2008-03-07 14:42 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=6658 Originator: YES Another user (don't know if he wants his name published here) informed me that DSLToolsRedist.msi isn't part of the VS2008 package. When following the instructions in the readme (remove the DSLTools package), it doesn't get installed again when running the setup batch file. The absence of this package causes the problem in mentioned in this bugreport and obviously other problems as well. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=809608&aid=1908322&group_id=158881 |
|
From: SourceForge.net <no...@so...> - 2008-03-07 14:42:21
|
Bugs item #1908322, was opened at 2008-03-05 21:21 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by gandalf_t You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=809608&aid=1908322&group_id=158881 Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the comment thread, including the initial issue submission, for this request, not just the latest update. Category: None Group: None Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Private: No Submitted By: Jos Bol (gandalf_t) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: Relational view showing the type of all fields as bit Initial Comment: After installing VS2008-02CTP for visual studio 2008 and opening the model I created using the previous CTP, the relational view shows the type "bit" for all fields, including the autocounter PK's. When looking at the entities, it seems that everything is ok and that this problem seems to be only in relational view component. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Jos Bol (gandalf_t) Date: 2008-03-07 14:42 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=6658 Originator: YES Another user (don't know if he wants his name published here) informed me that DSLToolsRedist.msi isn't part of the VS2008 package. When following the instructions in the readme (remove the DSLTools package), it doesn't get installed again when running the setup batch file. The absence of this package causes the problem in mentioned in this bugreport and obviously other problems as well. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=809608&aid=1908322&group_id=158881 |
|
From: SourceForge.net <no...@so...> - 2008-03-05 21:21:12
|
Bugs item #1908322, was opened at 2008-03-05 21:21 Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=809608&aid=1908322&group_id=158881 Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the comment thread, including the initial issue submission, for this request, not just the latest update. Category: None Group: None Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Private: No Submitted By: Jos Bol (gandalf_t) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: Relational view showing the type of all fields as bit Initial Comment: After installing VS2008-02CTP for visual studio 2008 and opening the model I created using the previous CTP, the relational view shows the type "bit" for all fields, including the autocounter PK's. When looking at the entities, it seems that everything is ok and that this problem seems to be only in relational view component. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=809608&aid=1908322&group_id=158881 |
|
From: SourceForge.net <no...@so...> - 2008-03-04 01:00:13
|
Bugs item #1906663, was opened at 2008-03-04 12:00 Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=809608&aid=1906663&group_id=158881 Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the comment thread, including the initial issue submission, for this request, not just the latest update. Category: None Group: None Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Private: No Submitted By: Clifford Heath (cjheath) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: Crash adding mandatory exclusion constraint Initial Comment: Adding a mandatory exclusion constraint between the Content roles of Paragraph and Comment crashes Visual Studio using the 2620 build of NORMA. Model file is attached. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=809608&aid=1906663&group_id=158881 |
|
From: SourceForge.net <no...@so...> - 2007-08-08 00:53:08
|
Bugs item #1768895, was opened at 2007-08-06 16:56 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by mcurland You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=809608&aid=1768895&group_id=158881 Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the comment thread, including the initial issue submission, for this request, not just the latest update. Category: None Group: None Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Private: No Submitted By: TJO (timodell) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: Cannot Delete Role Initial Comment: Right clicking a role box and selecting "Delete Role" results in null reference exception. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Matthew Curland (mcurland) Date: 2007-08-07 17:53 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1452263 Originator: NO In general this works fine, so you'll need to narrow this down. Do you have a callstack for the exception? Are any of the extensions turned on (see the Extension Manager on the context menu)? Could you just attach a model file to demonstrate the behavior? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=809608&aid=1768895&group_id=158881 |
|
From: SourceForge.net <no...@so...> - 2007-08-07 01:22:49
|
Bugs item #1768919, was opened at 2007-08-07 11:22 Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=809608&aid=1768919&group_id=158881 Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the comment thread, including the initial issue submission, for this request, not just the latest update. Category: None Group: None Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Private: No Submitted By: Clifford Heath (cjheath) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: Objectified Unaries now cause duplicate names Initial Comment: The ValueType that is now created for a unary fact type clashes with the name of the objectification. Try to enter for example Terry's model "Death objectifies (Person(Name) is dead)" - the objectification is done so that a cause-of-death fact type can be added. this worked ok in the previous CTP because there was no implicit ValueType. It doesn't seem possible to rename either of the duplicates. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=809608&aid=1768919&group_id=158881 |
|
From: SourceForge.net <no...@so...> - 2007-08-06 23:56:48
|
Bugs item #1768895, was opened at 2007-08-06 16:56 Message generated for change (Settings changed) made by timodell You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=809608&aid=1768895&group_id=158881 Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the comment thread, including the initial issue submission, for this request, not just the latest update. Category: None Group: None Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Private: No Submitted By: TJO (timodell) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) >Summary: Cannot Delete Role Initial Comment: Right clicking a role box and selecting "Delete Role" results in null reference exception. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=809608&aid=1768895&group_id=158881 |
|
From: SourceForge.net <no...@so...> - 2007-08-06 23:56:02
|
Bugs item #1768895, was opened at 2007-08-06 16:56 Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=809608&aid=1768895&group_id=158881 Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the comment thread, including the initial issue submission, for this request, not just the latest update. Category: None Group: None Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Private: No Submitted By: TJO (timodell) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: Cannot Delete Rol Initial Comment: Right clicking a role box and selecting "Delete Role" results in null reference exception. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=809608&aid=1768895&group_id=158881 |
|
From: SourceForge.net <no...@so...> - 2007-08-03 11:49:36
|
Bugs item #1765988, was opened at 2007-08-02 20:23 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by cjheath You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=809608&aid=1765988&group_id=158881 Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the comment thread, including the initial issue submission, for this request, not just the latest update. Category: None Group: None Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Private: No Submitted By: Clifford Heath (cjheath) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: Subtype Connector won't drop Initial Comment: Put two entity types on a diagram, select the subtype connector tool. The subtype cursor is shown. Click on one entity type, drag out to the other (the subtype connector arc is shown). When the mouse passes into the 2nd entity typem the background greys to indicate the drop zone. Release the mouse, and the cursor, arc, and grey background vanish, but no subtype arrow appears. There appears to be no way to define a subtype. I'm running Windows XP SP2 with NORMA 2007-06b CTP under Parallels Desktop 26 Feb 2007 (build 3186) on Mac OS/X. It seems to be the same whether Parallel is in full-screen, windowed or Coherence mode. The same thing happened with the previous (May?) CTP I had previously, but I didn't worry because I assumed it would be fixed with the new CTP. This is a pretty embarrassing bug guys - in front of a client trying to do some real-world modeling, to find the tool lets me down and I can't make any forward progress. Please let me know another way to define s subtype with this CTP. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Clifford Heath (cjheath) Date: 2007-08-03 21:49 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1608419 Originator: YES Sorry, it was my fault of course. The role connectors work with drag&drop, and the subtype one looks like it's trying to... it's been a few weeks since I was using NORMA regularly and I had forgotten how it works... that doesn't mean it shouldn't be fixed of course :-) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Kevin M. Owen (kevinowen) Date: 2007-08-03 00:21 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1014759 Originator: NO Click on the object type you want to be the subtype, and then click on the object type you want to be the supertype. Clicking on the subtype and then dragging to the supertype will eventually be possible, but hasn't been implemented yet. Please accept our apology for any inconvenience this caused. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=809608&aid=1765988&group_id=158881 |
|
From: SourceForge.net <no...@so...> - 2007-08-02 14:20:57
|
Bugs item #1765988, was opened at 2007-08-02 03:23 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by kevinowen You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=809608&aid=1765988&group_id=158881 Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the comment thread, including the initial issue submission, for this request, not just the latest update. Category: None Group: None Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Private: No Submitted By: Clifford Heath (cjheath) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: Subtype Connector won't drop Initial Comment: Put two entity types on a diagram, select the subtype connector tool. The subtype cursor is shown. Click on one entity type, drag out to the other (the subtype connector arc is shown). When the mouse passes into the 2nd entity typem the background greys to indicate the drop zone. Release the mouse, and the cursor, arc, and grey background vanish, but no subtype arrow appears. There appears to be no way to define a subtype. I'm running Windows XP SP2 with NORMA 2007-06b CTP under Parallels Desktop 26 Feb 2007 (build 3186) on Mac OS/X. It seems to be the same whether Parallel is in full-screen, windowed or Coherence mode. The same thing happened with the previous (May?) CTP I had previously, but I didn't worry because I assumed it would be fixed with the new CTP. This is a pretty embarrassing bug guys - in front of a client trying to do some real-world modeling, to find the tool lets me down and I can't make any forward progress. Please let me know another way to define s subtype with this CTP. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Kevin M. Owen (kevinowen) Date: 2007-08-02 07:21 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1014759 Originator: NO Click on the object type you want to be the subtype, and then click on the object type you want to be the supertype. Clicking on the subtype and then dragging to the supertype will eventually be possible, but hasn't been implemented yet. Please accept our apology for any inconvenience this caused. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=809608&aid=1765988&group_id=158881 |
|
From: SourceForge.net <no...@so...> - 2007-08-02 10:23:55
|
Bugs item #1765988, was opened at 2007-08-02 20:23 Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=809608&aid=1765988&group_id=158881 Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the comment thread, including the initial issue submission, for this request, not just the latest update. Category: None Group: None Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Private: No Submitted By: Clifford Heath (cjheath) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: Subtype Connector won't drop Initial Comment: Put two entity types on a diagram, select the subtype connector tool. The subtype cursor is shown. Click on one entity type, drag out to the other (the subtype connector arc is shown). When the mouse passes into the 2nd entity typem the background greys to indicate the drop zone. Release the mouse, and the cursor, arc, and grey background vanish, but no subtype arrow appears. There appears to be no way to define a subtype. I'm running Windows XP SP2 with NORMA 2007-06b CTP under Parallels Desktop 26 Feb 2007 (build 3186) on Mac OS/X. It seems to be the same whether Parallel is in full-screen, windowed or Coherence mode. The same thing happened with the previous (May?) CTP I had previously, but I didn't worry because I assumed it would be fixed with the new CTP. This is a pretty embarrassing bug guys - in front of a client trying to do some real-world modeling, to find the tool lets me down and I can't make any forward progress. Please let me know another way to define s subtype with this CTP. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=809608&aid=1765988&group_id=158881 |
|
From: SourceForge.net <no...@so...> - 2007-07-20 16:43:57
|
Bugs item #1752700, was opened at 2007-07-12 08:10 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by mcurland You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=809608&aid=1752700&group_id=158881 Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the comment thread, including the initial issue submission, for this request, not just the latest update. Category: None Group: None Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Private: No Submitted By: Orion Bühler (orionb) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: Occasional inablility to change roles on an internal constra Initial Comment: When the fact type is displayed vertically (rotated right) I couldn't change it from a 'one to many' to a 'many to many' by doubleclicking on the constraint to edit its roles. I was able to get around it by changing to horizontal display, changing the constraint, and rotating it back. I was also still able to select roles and rightclick to 'add constraint.' It was only when doubleclicking the little purple dash to the right of the role boxes. However, I was unable to duplicate this on a new model. To help with this elusive lil' bug, I've attached the 'flypaper.orm' file. I took my model and removed everything unrelated, testing to see if the bug remained. Hopefully this helps track it down! ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Matthew Curland (mcurland) Date: 2007-07-20 09:43 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1452263 Originator: NO flypaper.orm has nothing in it, a real file would be useful. Are you sure a reading shape (or some other shape) is not obscuring part of the constraint? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=809608&aid=1752700&group_id=158881 |
|
From: SourceForge.net <no...@so...> - 2007-07-20 16:32:15
|
Bugs item #1755224, was opened at 2007-07-16 18:56 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by mcurland You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=809608&aid=1755224&group_id=158881 Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the comment thread, including the initial issue submission, for this request, not just the latest update. Category: None Group: None Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Private: No Submitted By: Orion Bühler (orionb) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: Significant Slowdown on object selection Initial Comment: I'mediting a large model, in which the entity type 'Money Amount' plays a role in approximately 75 different facts. When selecting 'Money Amount on the diagram (or in the model browser) there is a pause of several seconds between the mouse click and the response. My suspicion is that the delay is related to the context window. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Matthew Curland (mcurland) Date: 2007-07-20 09:32 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1452263 Originator: NO Close the context window and change the selection a couple of times, including selecting an element that is not attached to the 'Money Amount' entity type. Does the selection time change? I'd need the model to do any extensive investigation on this issue. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=809608&aid=1755224&group_id=158881 |
|
From: SourceForge.net <no...@so...> - 2007-07-17 01:56:11
|
Bugs item #1755224, was opened at 2007-07-16 20:56 Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=809608&aid=1755224&group_id=158881 Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the comment thread, including the initial issue submission, for this request, not just the latest update. Category: None Group: None Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Private: No Submitted By: Orion Bühler (orionb) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: Significant Slowdown on object selection Initial Comment: I'mediting a large model, in which the entity type 'Money Amount' plays a role in approximately 75 different facts. When selecting 'Money Amount on the diagram (or in the model browser) there is a pause of several seconds between the mouse click and the response. My suspicion is that the delay is related to the context window. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=809608&aid=1755224&group_id=158881 |
|
From: SourceForge.net <no...@so...> - 2007-07-12 15:10:10
|
Bugs item #1752700, was opened at 2007-07-12 10:10 Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=809608&aid=1752700&group_id=158881 Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the comment thread, including the initial issue submission, for this request, not just the latest update. Category: None Group: None Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Private: No Submitted By: Orion Bühler (orionb) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: Occasional inablility to change roles on an internal constra Initial Comment: When the fact type is displayed vertically (rotated right) I couldn't change it from a 'one to many' to a 'many to many' by doubleclicking on the constraint to edit its roles. I was able to get around it by changing to horizontal display, changing the constraint, and rotating it back. I was also still able to select roles and rightclick to 'add constraint.' It was only when doubleclicking the little purple dash to the right of the role boxes. However, I was unable to duplicate this on a new model. To help with this elusive lil' bug, I've attached the 'flypaper.orm' file. I took my model and removed everything unrelated, testing to see if the bug remained. Hopefully this helps track it down! ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=809608&aid=1752700&group_id=158881 |
|
From: SourceForge.net <no...@so...> - 2007-07-11 01:00:28
|
Bugs item #1751433, was opened at 2007-07-10 12:55 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by mcurland You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=809608&aid=1751433&group_id=158881 Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the comment thread, including the initial issue submission, for this request, not just the latest update. Category: None Group: None >Status: Closed >Resolution: Fixed >Priority: 8 Private: No Submitted By: Orion Bühler (orionb) >Assigned to: Matthew Curland (mcurland) Summary: Can't add external constraints to large models Initial Comment: When the model is large, I can't add any external constraints from the toolbox. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Matthew Curland (mcurland) Date: 2007-07-10 18:00 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1452263 Originator: NO The size of the model has nothing to do with it. External constraints would not drop onto any diagram. Fixed in 1055 and redropped in the 2007-06b release. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Orion Bühler (orionb) Date: 2007-07-10 13:23 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1644246 Originator: YES The constraint appears in the model browser, but not on the diagram. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=809608&aid=1751433&group_id=158881 |
|
From: SourceForge.net <no...@so...> - 2007-07-10 20:23:40
|
Bugs item #1751433, was opened at 2007-07-10 14:55 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by orionb You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=809608&aid=1751433&group_id=158881 Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the comment thread, including the initial issue submission, for this request, not just the latest update. Category: None Group: None Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Private: No Submitted By: Orion Bühler (orionb) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: Can't add external constraints to large models Initial Comment: When the model is large, I can't add any external constraints from the toolbox. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Orion Bühler (orionb) Date: 2007-07-10 15:23 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1644246 Originator: YES The constraint appears in the model browser, but not on the diagram. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=809608&aid=1751433&group_id=158881 |
|
From: SourceForge.net <no...@so...> - 2007-07-10 20:10:27
|
Bugs item #1751433, was opened at 2007-07-10 14:55 Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=809608&aid=1751433&group_id=158881 Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the comment thread, including the initial issue submission, for this request, not just the latest update. Category: None Group: None Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Private: No Submitted By: Orion Bühler (orionb) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: Can't add external constraints to large models Initial Comment: When the model is large, I can't add any external constraints from the toolbox. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=809608&aid=1751433&group_id=158881 |
|
From: SourceForge.net <no...@so...> - 2007-06-24 15:29:06
|
Bugs item #1742448, was opened at 2007-06-24 10:29 Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=809608&aid=1742448&group_id=158881 Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the comment thread, including the initial issue submission, for this request, not just the latest update. Category: None Group: None Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Private: No Submitted By: Brian Nalewajek (brian27) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: Mixing terms Mode/Scheme Initial Comment: Hi, Just noticed that the error message displayed, when an entity object type does not have an assigned reference mode, states "Error 2 Entity type 'EOT' in model 'Base' requires a preferred reference scheme." In the properties window for this entity object type, there is a "RefMode" combo box. I've heard that the subject of reference modes and value types are part of internal discussions at Neumont. Whatever the outcome, it would be best to settle on one term. Personally, I think "scheme" make more sense than "mode" in this context, but consistency within the tool and throughout the documentation is probably more important. By any name, the concept is important and took me a while to understand. You don't want to frustrate people new to ORM. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=809608&aid=1742448&group_id=158881 |
|
From: SourceForge.net <no...@so...> - 2007-04-28 02:20:21
|
Bugs item #1689349, was opened at 2007-03-27 09:34 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by sf-robot You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=809608&aid=1689349&group_id=158881 Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the comment thread, including the initial issue submission, for this request, not just the latest update. Category: None Group: None >Status: Closed Resolution: Fixed Priority: 3 Private: No Submitted By: Tyler (tynman) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: Inconsistent constraint coloring for numeric ranges Initial Comment: Not sure if this is by design, but I'm guessing not.... I just created a value range on a Numeric: Unsigned Integer value type. If the range is [1..14], "The possible values of MyValueType are at least 1 to at most 14" is in bolded blue. Any combination of (1..14], (1..14), [1..14) has the "at most"/"at least"/"above"/"below" text in green. I believe the [] bolded blue combination is probably the formatting error. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: SourceForge Robot (sf-robot) Date: 2007-04-27 19:20 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1312539 Originator: NO This Tracker item was closed automatically by the system. It was previously set to a Pending status, and the original submitter did not respond within 14 days (the time period specified by the administrator of this Tracker). ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Matthew Curland (mcurland) Date: 2007-04-13 13:00 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1452263 Originator: NO Consistent with changeset #1014. Also added a color option for instance values and bound values to this instead of the objectType category. The blue was correct (these are categorized as quantifiers). If you have other suggestions pipe back in. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=809608&aid=1689349&group_id=158881 |
|
From: SourceForge.net <no...@so...> - 2007-04-27 02:20:21
|
Bugs item #1688612, was opened at 2007-03-26 11:04 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by sf-robot You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=809608&aid=1688612&group_id=158881 Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the comment thread, including the initial issue submission, for this request, not just the latest update. Category: None Group: None >Status: Closed Resolution: Fixed Priority: 5 Private: No Submitted By: Tyler (tynman) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: Cannot rotate fact types,change constraint display position Initial Comment: Don't know if it's just me (nobody else around me has a running copy of NORMA to test it on), but as of revision 1012 you cannot rotate the fact types. The menus show up fine, and I can swap roles, but selecting "Vertical, rotated ____" does nothing. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: SourceForge Robot (sf-robot) Date: 2007-04-26 19:20 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1312539 Originator: NO This Tracker item was closed automatically by the system. It was previously set to a Pending status, and the original submitter did not respond within 14 days (the time period specified by the administrator of this Tracker). ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Matthew Curland (mcurland) Date: 2007-04-12 10:49 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1452263 Originator: NO Fixed in changeset 1013. Some modifications to the code were made to handle multiple shapes for the same element on the same diagram, and the transactions were not committed for the constraint position or orientation menu items. The corresponding properties in the property grid still worked correctly. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tyler (tynman) Date: 2007-03-27 10:35 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1303870 Originator: YES Also, the "Constraints on Top/Bottom" toggle doesn't work from the context menu. Works fine from Properties. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Kevin M. Owen (kevinowen) Date: 2007-03-26 11:13 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1014759 Originator: NO I've confirmed that this isn't working for me either through the context menu right now; we'll get that fixed. In the mean time, you rotate the fact types by directly changing the value of the DisplayOrientation property in the Properties window. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=809608&aid=1688612&group_id=158881 |
