From: <po...@pa...> - 2003-08-11 05:21:01
|
Colin: My apologies if my language seemed over the top: old Marine habits never die I suppose. Just wanted to clarify where I/we were lacking in understanding so I/we do not make the same mistake twice. Thank you very much for taking the time to reply with detail and explanation: I appreciate it! -poulh > Poul, > > I am somewhat surprised to receive an email from you with the subject > "redress process?" While I am always happy to explain the basis of my > grading, I found the tenor of your email vaguely offensive. I daresay > you didn't intend it that way, but that is how it came across to me. > > Having said that, let me address your questions one by one: > > 1) As far as the final project is concerned, your program created > a new deck for every game played, and the cards continued to show after > they should have been removed. Both these topics were discussed in > class. Surely a score of 9 out of 10 is entirely reasonable (perhaps > even generous) under the circumstances? > > 2) For the Pizza project, you submitted no test samples > whatsoever, so I am unable to tell if your application works or not. I > thought I made it quite clear in class that test samples were to be > included. Certainly, all the other students submitted test samples. > > 3) For the "exceptions" project, you also turned in no test > samples. In addition, you caught the exception in the constructor > itself, rather than in the code that calls the constructor, which is > where it belongs. > > I hope this answers your questions to your satisfaction, but if not, > please send me another email... Colin > > |